Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 3:52 am
(December 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: I have a few more threads to make, then I will be gone with the wind
More like flushed away with a fart.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:05 am (This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 5:59 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(December 15, 2014 at 10:23 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: 'Flex my muscles'? On an internet forum? I'm enforcing the rules that you have agreed to abide by, and are there to keep the forum running efficiently. You got a problem with it? Message the staff.
Oh, my bad, I missed the part in the rules where you get to merge shit.
then perhaps you need to engage your brain and actually read them, soppy bollocks:
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Just because you got slapped down by the rules and us doesn't mean you have a right to keep crying about it like a petulant child. Stop being stupid, or leave.
Oh, I won't be on here forever. I have a few more threads to make, then I will be gone with the wind...unless you want to continue playing God and ban me from the forum...you have ever right to do so
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: You've contributed nothing to the forum thus far except 80+ pages of utter nonsense.
Of course, you are an atheist, so it HAS to be nonsense. I don't expect anything different...just like it is nonsense to me the whole notion of abiogenesis and intelligence from nonintelligence...nonsense.
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: Weirdest thing is you think this is somehow different from the same old tired, debunked shit that's graced this and numerous other places of discussion for hundreds of years.
Debunked my ass. No one has debunked anything. The Kingdom of God has men of God out there on the forefront willing to debate anyone on the subject of the Resurrection or any argument for theism.
That is like a chef in the kitchen talking about "cooking is tiresome"...you are an atheist, in a atheist forum...Christians are welcomed here, and if the same old drag arguments that we use makes you tired, then get out of the kitchen.
(December 15, 2014 at 5:04 pm)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: And if you start another thread with the delusion that you've somehow presented something that you've then defended then we'll escalate to more than just merging threads.
Got it?
Hey, you ban me and you will be saving your counterparts a lot of spankings pimp juice.
Are you mentally ill? You can't leave it alone can you? You're certainly one the stupidest people that's ever been on here, and that's saying a lot considering the dregs we've had here before. 'There is no fossil Record' and not knowing what the other side of the sun is like? I mean LOL. Come the fuck along?
I've repeatedly told you to stop being stupid. But it seems you are incapable. Very well.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:20 am (This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 4:27 am by robvalue.)
Watching an apologist make an argument is like watching someone pick up a deck of cards, shuffle it, and then show me the cards one by one. I'm then expected to be surprised or impressed by this.
If you don't have anything new, don't bother.
And anyhow, if you can logically demonstrate God to be real, then faith is no longer required. And faith is what you claim to be important.
No one believes in any of this because of the terrible arguments they present. They're lame, after-the-fact rationalizations of an irrational foregone conclusion. Which is why they are always dishonest and unconvincing.
Also, do you notice how apologists often employ exactly the same arguments but then come to different conclusions? (Yahweh or Allah for example.)
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:28 am
Just for the record, the Rules also state amongst the legal small print: "You agree that “Atheist Forums” have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit."
Staff have the right to amend, remove and otherwise edit any material deemed in violation of the Rules, as well as for the smooth running of the forum. The door's that way, just past the coffee machine, for anyone who doesn't like that.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:32 am (This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 4:33 am by robvalue.)
Yeah, I guess they must. That's mighty arrogant to think they have come up with something so brilliant that no one else has thought of it for 2000 years. Especially when it turns out to be something you could find on another post on the same forum.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:36 am
It's also insulting to the intelligence that these arguments can be traced back ultimately to the same few sources. Craig, Bruggencate or Hovind, the usual suspects leave their insidious fingerprints everywhere.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:41 am (This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 4:46 am by robvalue.)
Indeed. But I think the most insulting to the intelligence of all is, "Go read the bible." Especially when it's glaringly obvious that atheists have spent much more time reading it than Christians.
And I'm sure if a Muslim told them to "Go read the Quran", they'd get right on it.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 4:48 am
Have we had "you just don't want to hear the truth because you hate me / hate God / enjoy your sinful lifestyle too much!!!" yet? That's the absolute death rattle of these things.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 5:08 am (This post was last modified: December 16, 2014 at 5:08 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(December 16, 2014 at 4:48 am)Stimbo Wrote: Have we had "you just don't want to hear the truth because you hate me / hate God / enjoy your sinful lifestyle too much!!!" yet? That's the absolute death rattle of these things.
or the old "you just don't want to believe."
Forgetting that many atheists, perhaps the majority in places like the US, were once theists. I guess they just weren't the right 'type' of theist/Xtian.
We're in the 21st century, but reading the thoughts of some of these guys you'd think we were still in the 12th.
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
