Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 2:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:00 pm)Free Wrote: Actually, this is who I am.

Wink Shades

(crickets chirping)
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Wait. Two days in and you pull a Poe?

*Can't decide whether to be irritated or impressed*
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Wait. Two days in and you pull a Poe?

*Can't decide whether to be irritated or impressed*

Well ffs ... what kind of theist comes in here with "Theist Shithead" under his avatar, and a signature that says Jesus dicked Mary?

ROFLOL
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Thing is, what's happened now is we actually know far less about you than we did ten minutes ago. If that's the effect you were going for, well done.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:05 pm)Free Wrote:
(December 22, 2014 at 5:03 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Wait. Two days in and you pull a Poe?

*Can't decide whether to be irritated or impressed*

Well ffs ... what kind of theist comes in here with "Theist Shithead" under his avatar, and a signature that says Jesus dicked Mary?

ROFLOL

Like I said, I was entertaining the Minimalist-sock hypothesis.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:07 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Thing is, what's happened now is we actually know far less about you than we did ten minutes ago. If that's the effect you were going for, well done.

Thanks!

I just had to try and give as many people a hard time as possible while trying to avoid the ban wand. The kids here ( my employees) at my office are ROFL.

We are all atheists here in my business.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I totally saw this coming. Totally.
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."

-Stephen Jay Gould
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:16 pm)Tonus Wrote: I totally saw this coming. Totally.

lol like seriously ... how could you not see it coming?
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I actually had it the other way round. I thought you to be HMs sock. But that was obviously giving him too much credit.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 22, 2014 at 5:22 pm)abaris Wrote: I actually had it the other way round. I thought you to be HMs sock. But that was obviously giving him too much credit.
I have been following his posts. That is one seriously indoctrinated theist, and absolutely hopeless for any kind of reformation.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 4146 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 6387 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 9376 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 4066 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 4285 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1702 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 4129 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 3429 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 20894 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2487 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 42 Guest(s)