Also,

(January 5, 2015 at 2:36 am)robvalue Wrote: Seems like our forum has some professional salad tossers.

Happy the man who is paid for his hobby.

In Atheist Forums standard mode, the InterWeb Detonator Word Salad Deflogisticator may be activated by typing the adjoint of the adjacent tag. Assuming the tag closes properly, the complex conjugate will insure a compatible activation. That's all there is to it.

Hope all of you appreciate this aspect of the new feature package and the continuing upgrade to MyBB/Remora IV.

Without comment, since I don't understand it anyway.

(January 5, 2015 at 7:47 pm)Chili Wrote: So now we can place involution opposite to evolution and that would place energy opposite entropy with entropy being the period in life that we would call post menopause when eternity is seen from the inside out. This is an assumption I make based on the word meno which is the Greek word for "I remain" that would implicate eternal for us. It is from here that neologic induction can be made to infer wisdom into our speeches so that the next generation will benefit from the life forms we see in our past lives. This would be where speeches can be deductive, seductive and inductive that in the extreme means life or death, with, true enough, an undistributed middle somewhere in between.

Somebody found the Deepak Chopra emulator.

(January 5, 2015 at 7:52 pm)abaris Wrote: Without comment, since I don't understand it anyway.

(January 5, 2015 at 7:47 pm)Chili Wrote: So now we can place involution opposite to evolution and that would place energy opposite entropy with entropy being the period in life that we would call post menopause when eternity is seen from the inside out. This is an assumption I make based on the word meno which is the Greek word for "I remain" that would implicate eternal for us. It is from here that neologic induction can be made to infer wisdom into our speeches so that the next generation will benefit from the life forms we see in our past lives. This would be where speeches can be deductive, seductive and inductive that in the extreme means life or death, with, true enough, an undistributed middle somewhere in between.

I'd be seriously worried about if you did understand it.

---

Just a hair late for Christmas, but nevertheless a memorable retelling of our "savior's" birth.

(January 5, 2015 at 2:28 am)Chili Wrote: Yes, well here is how that goes so you won't pull your hair out. [Too late for that]

He was said to be a carpenter because carpenters are known to make many things, and since all is created in sin he was a sinner for sure; with sin being the rout in which two opposites take a stand as serious contenders and let the chips fall where they will. [It would be chips, he being a carpenter and all.]

So the story is about in his final round of Samsara that Plato called final Form and we call the Christ mass today.[And now a little sprinkle of Eastern philosophy or at least a word therefrom.]

So then Joseph was the Jew to whom Christ was born that we would call rebirth because John tells us we must. This then is why woman was riding the donkey while Joseph was as much as dragging his ass behind it as if he was pregnant with despair, as Joyce would put it, and that is why there was no room at the Inn because he was 'beyond theology' and really was the donkey with Mary in charge of destiny at this point in his life. [I think I like the donkey best, it's a take charge kinda beast.]

So then what they call Christ was born from the nucleus of his fathers sperm and that is the substance behind rebirth to make sure he is doing it right (cf Matthew and Mark, but let's leave that for now). [Just what is it we are leaving? Never mind. Carry on.]

Essential here is that he had 12 shepherd on the go who were taking turns herding their own sheep in the middle of a midwinter night, as if his 'insights were on the run' that Aristotle called ousia's when first created to see. That so is what makes par-ousia his final ousia in which the rout was between his identity as created to be and the Adamic pretender he chose to be as rational agent. It therefore is that Jesus was insurrectionist here in role-play only, while Joseph was the undergoer of this midlife event. [You see? It's really all about Joseph's midlife crisis?]

This then would have him freely crucify his own ego awareness as the first Adam in him, which in turn makes Jesus known as second Adam and you can figure out the rest the story on your own.[Ah Freud. No wonder its word salad.]

Jesus, Paul, the authors of the Gospels of both Luke and Mathew, Buddha, Joyce, Plato, the author of The Gospel of John, Freud, and Aristotle are whirling in their graves.

(January 5, 2015 at 7:52 pm)abaris Wrote: Without comment, since I don't understand it anyway.

(January 5, 2015 at 7:47 pm)Chili Wrote: So now we can place involution opposite to evolution and that would place energy opposite entropy with entropy being the period in life that we would call post menopause when eternity is seen from the inside out. This is an assumption I make based on the word meno which is the Greek word for "I remain" that would implicate eternal for us. It is from here that neologic induction can be made to infer wisdom into our speeches so that the next generation will benefit from the life forms we see in our past lives. This would be where speeches can be deductive, seductive and inductive that in the extreme means life or death, with, true enough, an undistributed middle somewhere in between.

Seriously? Is posting copypasta straight from the postmodernism generator not a bannable offense?

There's nothing to understand. An involution is a special kind of mathematical map, menopause, well you know what menopause is, and entropy is not opposite to energy. The only thing these things have in common is that they don't have anything to do with each other.

To let you fully appreciate this enlightening conversation I included my question to dear Chily.

(January 6, 2015 at 10:49 am)Chili Wrote:

(January 6, 2015 at 10:43 am)abaris Wrote: Sure, but don't you think the Q continuum violates the blumpkin constant?

We are not talking origins here but Christ with us, and in us, as the being in being that also was prior to us and therefore we must consume our equals to stay alive in our modern bio-socio environment, just as it always has been in the past.

Quote:we must consume our equals

Isn't that nice...

Sorry this thread is turning out to be a one theist show:

(January 6, 2015 at 11:51 am)Chili Wrote: That is just the nature of who she is as the back-bone of males, and is the womb as wisdom retained for the next generation to bare, as I wrote before.

From here it is better to milk her breast and not her brain by making her more human like males, is what position is in the colloquial here.

That is where, how and why beauty is the vapor of truth and has its own right to be. So why bleed it and soon grow hair on their chest much like males in the extreme opposite here?