Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 21, 2015 at 10:02 pm
To be honest, so did I at first. I mean I'd heard stories of the fangirls making their "indecent proposals" at signings, and him not exactly averse to the idea.
Wish I was a famous scientist sometimes...
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 183
Threads: 7
Joined: January 13, 2015
Reputation:
11
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 21, 2015 at 10:20 pm
Summary:
"Fuckity fucker u r gay and want to be a bacteria bc yiu wrote science books burn in hell bi-yotch
God bless (everyone but ui you. Hope you suffer a realy really bad deaf("
Ah, fundies prove their own stupidity.
Gone
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 12:53 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2015 at 12:55 am by Alex K.)
Finally, at the age of 73, Richard Dawkins learned how to pronounce b i a t c h. We can now safely shut down civilization and go home.
p.s. I didn't like really the music. I would have liked something more dramatic, akin to the "youtube comments reconstruction" by shakespearean actors. His tone is already similar.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 15351
Threads: 118
Joined: January 13, 2014
Reputation:
117
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 12:55 am
Still, tho. Bitch Licker.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Posts: 170
Threads: 5
Joined: January 10, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 12:56 am
That was maybe the best thing ever.
There was another one of these that he did a while ago, but I like this one.
Posts: 349
Threads: 1
Joined: January 7, 2015
Reputation:
5
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 1:08 am
I don't know what I laughed harder at, the fuck you fuckety, fucker, or Dawkins pronouncing lol instead of Laugh out loud.
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
Epicurus
Posts: 170
Threads: 5
Joined: January 10, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 1:09 am
(January 22, 2015 at 1:08 am)404NotFound Wrote: I don't know what I laughed harder at, the fuck you fuckety, fucker, or Dawkins pronouncing lol instead of Laugh out loud. Hey! I do that.
Posts: 349
Threads: 1
Joined: January 7, 2015
Reputation:
5
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 1:11 am
Are you English? Just wondering if it's a cultural thing. If it is, I've learned something new today.
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”
Epicurus
Posts: 170
Threads: 5
Joined: January 10, 2015
Reputation:
7
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 1:15 am
No, I'm Canadian.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: 'Love letters' to Richard Dawkins
January 22, 2015 at 1:20 am
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2015 at 1:21 am by Alex K.)
(January 22, 2015 at 12:55 am)SteelCurtain Wrote: Still, tho. Bitch Licker.
I wondered whether he was supposed to get the rabies from licking the bitch. Makes sense, no?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
|
