Tektonics is J P Holding's site and he is an even dumber fuck than you, drippy. Except, he makes a lot of money by telling shitheads like you what you want to hear. In that, he is far more successful than you.

Should have gone and beaten the shit out of drippy. Would have been more useful!

(March 1, 2015 at 6:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Should have gone and beaten the shit out of drippy. Would have been more useful!

Nah, he's a speedbag, designed to take punches, and only useful for training on the absolute basics.

That the word in Tacitus meaning "the good" - Chrestianos - has since been altered to Christianos - "the Christians", as this UV imaging of the original manuscript revealed:



If Tacitus had intended to use that word, surely he would have done so. There should have been no need and certainly no excuse to forge evidence.

Is it just me that finds these forgeries absolutely hilarious?

(February 27, 2015 at 12:12 pm)YGninja Wrote: Imagine you are a policeman attending the aftermath of a supposed armed robbery of a shop. If all of the cashiers claimed the masked man entered the building at precisely 20:47, would you be more or less suspicious about their story than if they had given slightly varying times? "10 to 9", "about quarter to 9", "just before closing time at 9"...??
The differences are natural and demonstrate that there wasn't a conspiracy to invent the entire story.

The buy-bull "eye-witness" testimonies are more like this.
Witness 1: The robber came in about a quarter to nine, just before we closed last night.
Witness 2: Bullshit, it happened at 9:15, just after we opened yesterday.
Witness 3: Guys, it happened sometime last week.
Witness 4: We got robbed? Oh yeah, but that was a month ago.

Besides, even if you actually had first hand accounts, so the fuck what. Eye-witness testimony alone is worthless. Despite Wiggy's claim, no-one gets convicted on eye-witness testimony alone. If that's all the DA has, he won't even take it to trial.