(March 11, 2015 at 5:24 am)h4ym4n Wrote:

(March 10, 2015 at 5:08 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: Yes, of course, just as Nebuchadnezzar was doing God's will (and the Bible explicitly says he was). Hitler didn't know that's what he was doing, of course, and Hitler I am sure has been severely punished, as he should have been. No one escapes justice.

---

Wait, did I read this correctly? Hitler was under gods command and doing so is now being punished? And you're sure of that?

According to Miles's logic, Hitler did know he was doing god's will. At least he said so. Wasn't Miles also the one rambling about god talking to him? Well, maybe god did the same with Hitler.

Quote: "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord." - Adolf Hitler

Or how about this one?

Quote: "My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people.

(March 10, 2015 at 5:53 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote:

(March 10, 2015 at 5:31 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: I volunteer on a sexual assault response team. One of my colleagues was called to the forensic hospital one night to advocate for a thirteen-year-old rape victim. When my colleague got there, she noticed the front of her blouse was bleeding. The little girl told her the rapist (a family friend) bit her nipple off.

I wonder what a thirteen-year-old did to deserve that.

Again, I tell you children are punished for the sins of the fathers to the third and fourth generation. It's a terrible thing, yes. The wrath of God is terrible indeed.

Well that explains why Christians turn a blind eye to men of the cloth (gods employees) getting a pass with forcing their penis into children's bodies.

---

(March 10, 2015 at 4:59 pm)Sionnach Wrote:

(March 10, 2015 at 4:57 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: You make it sound as though the person who was raped never did anything wrong in the first place.

You now officially deserve the CUNT title.

And unlike on RuPaul's Drag Race, it is not an acronym for Charisma, Uniqueness, Nerve, Talent.

Have to agree with sionnach, you're a cunt and your god is a cunt.

(March 10, 2015 at 7:15 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: You all dare lecture me on morality? You hypocrites, take a look in the mirror!

Indeed, many of us will dare to lecture you on morality and you've already explained why:

1. Your God is responsible for all human action, 'good' & 'evil'
2. All actions are designed & controlled by him thus rendering humans unaccountable & unresponsible for anything they do; only your God can be accountable & responsible
3. All 'evil' is actually 'good', which is to say that it serves God's purpose for evil to happen
4. People, other than those directly involved in any scenario where 'evil' is done, must be punished by your God for things they haven't done, could have had no part in, may never have done themselves and/or the occurrence of which they may not even be aware of

Consequently, you have no basis for describing any action as 'evil' nor can you blame people for them. There's no way of applying concepts of justice because there can be no such thing under this system, only the puppetry of totalitarianism. Since 'morality' is defined as 'principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behaviour' and under your God's system there can be no such distinction, your God is amoral, as you claim you are in your adherence to those principles. I would say 'physician, heal thyself'.

However there's a ray of light here as you clearly do have a moral centre: you perceive justice & injustice, you're disgusted by evil, you would rather people take action to make other people's lives better than do nothing, (for all it's errors) you imagine a world in which 'justice for all' is attainable.

I tell you that you're better than the God you worship, more moral, more just. The saddest thing about this thread is that you would dismiss your own morality in favour of a system which clearly sits in direct opposition to the way you truly feel about people and the way they should be treated. Never, in my experience, has the personal harm caused by Christian indoctrination been more clearly illustrated.

(March 11, 2015 at 5:24 am)h4ym4n Wrote:

(March 10, 2015 at 3:57 pm)MilesAbbott81 Wrote: Yes, it seems harsh, but the wrath of God is no joke.

Hey Miles, this awesome all knowing god of yours, just before IT said let there be light, IT ran the scenario of Adam and Eve never eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil out to eternity, right?

We're talking god here, it would have no problem running both scenarios and then choose which scenario IT wanted to use.


So god chose this reality to use as ITs creation model.

This just shows how absurd it seems to take any culture's creation myth literally .. especially once that society has developed the means to make the printed word generally available and amassed a vast amount of empirical data by way of the scientific method. Fundamentalist Christians find the creation myths of other cultures charming but refuse to see their own in the same way. The results are always absurd.

You know, after re-reading some of the posts in this thread, I cannot imagine that Miles can possibly be more than 10- or 12-years old, regurgitating confused and half remembered crap from his parents and/or pastor/priest/shaman/medicine man. He throws out disparate, conflicting viewpoints, often refuting himself within the same page of the thread and sometimes the same post while acting like he's got the most withering arguments ever, all while displaying a horrifying lack of knowledge of the subject or even his own source material. In short, typical adolescent debate tactics.

(March 11, 2015 at 10:43 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: You know, after re-reading some of the posts in this thread, I cannot imagine that Miles can possibly be more than 10- or 12-years old, regurgitating confused and half remembered crap from his parents and/or pastor/priest/shaman/medicine man. He throws out disparate, conflicting viewpoints, often refuting himself within the same page of the thread and sometimes the same post while acting like he's got the most withering arguments ever, all while displaying a horrifying lack of knowledge of the subject or even his own source material. In short, typical adolescent debate tactics.

12 year old theist first time on a atheist forum more than likely.

(March 11, 2015 at 10:43 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: He throws out disparate, conflicting viewpoints, often refuting himself within the same page of the thread and sometimes the same post while acting like he's got the most withering arguments ever, all while displaying a horrifying lack of knowledge of the subject or even his own source material. In short, typical adolescent debate tactics.

Does that make my adolescent debate tactics hipster?

(March 11, 2015 at 11:50 am)Norman Humann Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 10:43 am)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: He throws out disparate, conflicting viewpoints, often refuting himself within the same page of the thread and sometimes the same post while acting like he's got the most withering arguments ever, all while displaying a horrifying lack of knowledge of the subject or even his own source material. In short, typical adolescent debate tactics.

Does that make my adolescent debate tactics hipster?

Yes yes it does.

(March 11, 2015 at 12:18 pm)dyresand Wrote: Yes yes it does.

(March 11, 2015 at 12:25 pm)Norman Humann Wrote:

(March 11, 2015 at 12:18 pm)dyresand Wrote: Yes yes it does.

And you know what and its still cool
So fuck them and their irrational arguments from faith.