Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 5:10 pm
The porn is just a spinoff technology from the cat videos
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm
Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 3395
Threads: 43
Joined: February 8, 2015
Reputation:
33
Cat Porn
June 2, 2015 at 5:40 pm
(June 2, 2015 at 5:10 pm)Alex K Wrote: The porn is just a spinoff technology from the cat videos
So does that mean the ultimate is cat porn?
(Do not open if you don't want to see.)
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 5:43 pm
(June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.
All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 6:11 pm
Except the electron?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 9:07 pm
No, neither does the electron, why?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 1164
Threads: 7
Joined: January 1, 2014
Reputation:
23
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 9:31 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2015 at 9:35 pm by JuliaL.)
How could you show that?
The wave packets of location probability density have extent don't they?
Is it a convenience? or are they definitely zero dimensional?
Or do we just not know?
I'm gonna back away slowly now...
Too much weirdness for me.
How does something without dimensions affect other things without dimensions?
Fields?
Particle exchanges?
Magnets? How do they work?
Rock crushers?
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat?
Posts: 19789
Threads: 57
Joined: September 24, 2010
Reputation:
85
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 9:40 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2015 at 9:42 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(June 2, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Alex K Wrote: (June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.
All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all
Perhaps not by definition, but by an assumption convenient to theoretical analysis, which remains convenient because it has not yet been contradicted by results of the highest resolution measurement we have yet been able to make I think?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 9:52 pm
(This post was last modified: June 2, 2015 at 10:06 pm by Alex K.)
(June 2, 2015 at 9:31 pm)JuliaL Wrote: How could you show that?
The wave packets of location probability density have extent don't they?
Is it a convenience? or are they definitely zero dimensional?
Or do we just not know?
I'm gonna back away slowly now...
Too much weirdness for me.
How does something without dimensions affect other things without dimensions?
Fields?
Particle exchanges?
Magnets? How do they work?
Rock crushers?
Ok great point. The size of wave functions is not the same as the size of a particle, although that's a subtle point I admit. Despite having a wave function which gives an uncertainty in location, the particle is assumed to be pointlike - actually, the fact that we can write the wave function of one particle as f(x) in the first place, as just the function of one coordinate, tells you that we characterize it as a point particle in the theory with a coordinate x. This is e.g. opposed to string theory, where you would have a wave function which depends not just on one coordinate x but on the whole position of the entire one-dimensional string in space.
How such a zero-dimensional object interacts with others... one can write down a field theory for it and it just works - I can say though that this zero-dimensionality is probably the reason for all the infinities one encounters in quantum field theory, which one has to "renormalize" in order to get sensible finite results...
Experimentally, one should see typical deviations from point-likeyness in the energy dependence of scattering amplitudes of these particles, which should drop off once the energy reaches
E~ c*h / size (c speed of light, h Plancks constant), which is the energy where one can start to resolve this size.
(June 2, 2015 at 9:40 pm)Chuck Wrote: (June 2, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Alex K Wrote: All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all
Perhaps not by definition, but by an assumption convenient to theoretical analysis, which remains convenient because it has not yet been contradicted by results of the highest resolution measurement we have yet been able to make I think?
Yes, you're right - I was thinking of the field theory treatment of elementary as opposed to composite particles , which we already know have some spatial extent. But one could imagine having "elementary" particles with some sort of nonzero size. The theory simply doesn't involve this feature.But with good reason because it is not observed on currently accessible scales.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
June 2, 2015 at 10:18 pm
So basically, everything at it's lowest common denominator, is just a variation of energy of varying frequencies which manifests itself sometimes as "matter".
So the whole universe has zero mass since the building blocks have no mass.
How does the higgs give other elementals mass if they do not occupy space?
I know I'm stupid, but I hope you understand what I mean.
I do find this stuff fascinating though.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
|