Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 15, 2024, 3:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
#71
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
The porn is just a spinoff technology from the cat videos
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#72
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#73
Cat Porn
(June 2, 2015 at 5:10 pm)Alex K Wrote: The porn is just a spinoff technology from the cat videos

So does that mean the ultimate is cat porn?


(Do not open if you don't want to see.)



"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
Reply
#74
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
(June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.

All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#75
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
Except the electron?
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply
#76
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
No, neither does the electron, why?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#77
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
How could you show that?
The wave packets of location probability density have extent don't they?
Is it a convenience? or are they definitely zero dimensional?
Or do we just not know?

I'm gonna back away slowly now...
Too much weirdness for me.
How does something without dimensions affect other things without dimensions?
Fields?
Particle exchanges?
Magnets? How do they work?
Rock crushers?
So how, exactly, does God know that She's NOT a brain in a vat? Huh
Reply
#78
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
(June 2, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Alex K Wrote:
(June 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm)ignoramus Wrote: Isn't it an irony that we needed to create the biggest machine in the world to find the smallest particle in the world.

All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all

Perhaps not by definition, but by an assumption convenient to theoretical analysis, which remains convenient because it has not yet been contradicted by results of the highest resolution measurement we have yet been able to make I think?
Reply
#79
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
(June 2, 2015 at 9:31 pm)JuliaL Wrote: How could you show that?
The wave packets of location probability density have extent don't they?
Is it a convenience? or are they definitely zero dimensional?
Or do we just not know?

I'm gonna back away slowly now...
Too much weirdness for me.
How does something without dimensions affect other things without dimensions?
Fields?
Particle exchanges?
Magnets?  How do they work?
Rock crushers?

Ok great point. The size of wave functions is not the same as the size of a particle, although that's a subtle point I admit. Despite having a wave function which gives an uncertainty in location, the particle is assumed to be pointlike - actually, the fact that we can write the wave function of one particle as f(x) in the first place, as just the function of one coordinate, tells you that we characterize it as a point particle in the theory with a coordinate x. This is e.g. opposed to string theory, where you would have a wave function which depends not just on one coordinate x but on the whole position of the entire one-dimensional string in space.

How such a zero-dimensional object interacts with others... one can write down a field theory for it and it just works - I can say though that this zero-dimensionality is probably the reason for all the infinities one encounters in quantum field theory, which one has to "renormalize" in order to get sensible finite results...

Experimentally, one should see typical deviations from point-likeyness in the energy dependence of scattering amplitudes of these particles, which should drop off once the energy reaches
E~ c*h / size (c speed of light, h Plancks constant), which is the energy where one can start to resolve this size.

(June 2, 2015 at 9:40 pm)Chuck Wrote:
(June 2, 2015 at 5:43 pm)Alex K Wrote: All elementary particles have by definition no known spatial extent at all

Perhaps not by definition, but by an assumption convenient to theoretical analysis, which remains convenient because it has not yet been contradicted by results of the highest resolution measurement we have yet been able to make I think?

Yes, you're right - I was thinking of the field theory treatment of elementary as opposed to composite particles , which we already know have some spatial extent. But one could imagine having "elementary" particles with some sort of nonzero size. The theory simply doesn't involve this feature.But with good reason because it is not observed on currently accessible scales.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#80
RE: First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist)
So basically, everything at it's lowest common denominator, is just a variation of energy of varying frequencies which manifests itself sometimes as "matter".
So the whole universe has zero mass since the building blocks have no mass.
How does the higgs give other elementals mass if they do not occupy space?

I know I'm stupid, but I hope you understand what I mean.
I do find this stuff fascinating though.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Earth’s energy budget is out of balance Jehanne 5 787 August 20, 2021 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Science Nerds: Could Jupiter's Magnetic Field be harvested for energy? vulcanlogician 28 3335 August 7, 2021 at 9:43 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Rethinking Dark Matter/Dark energy.... Brian37 11 2963 January 26, 2018 at 7:50 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  LHC rainbow universe dyresand 9 2142 October 22, 2017 at 9:32 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Are Photons the Particle Associatid with the CMB? Rhondazvous 5 1349 September 9, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why? theBorg 40 7119 August 21, 2016 at 2:13 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Could this explian what Dark matter and Dark energy is? Blueyedlion 49 8434 June 13, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Alleged Weasel heroically sacrifices himself to stop LHC Alex K 18 2024 May 6, 2016 at 3:05 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  LHC Weasel defense - play the exciting browser game Alex K 2 1145 May 4, 2016 at 10:09 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  Does the Law of Conservation of Matter/Energy Disallow Time Travel? Ari Sheffield 52 12210 March 24, 2016 at 5:04 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 24 Guest(s)