Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 2:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Poor Randy

[Image: circular_reasoning.png]


Dumb as a fucking rock.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 10:03 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 8:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: Even though I pretty much disagree with everything Randy types, you have to give him credit for trying.

It's a lot better than, "It happened because the bible said it happened.  The Bible is the word of god, because the Bible says it is!"

Absolutely!

Randy is a good guy and he definitely knows his stuff!

A PhD in bullshit is still only knowing bullshit.

And frankly, I doubt he's a good guy, myself.

I give Randy credit for persistence. As Pa Thump used to say, "Boy, you need to be too stupid to quit."

Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 10:02 pm)Pizza Wrote: "Christian beliefs are true and have good reasons for them, therefor Christian beliefs count as knowledge."

Swiiiiing and a miss. One down in the bottom of the ninth.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 10:03 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 8:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: Even though I pretty much disagree with everything Randy types, you have to give him credit for trying.

It's a lot better than, "It happened because the bible said it happened.  The Bible is the word of god, because the Bible says it is!"

Absolutely!

Randy is a good guy and he definitely knows his stuff!

[Image: pshaw.gif]

I'm learning.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Notice how he didn't answer the reply.

This is why using "ignore" is for pussies and charlatans.

As Frank Herbert wrote in Dune, "Those who see only what they wish are doomed to rot in the stink of their own perceptions."

Randy has chosen that route.

Can't remember who it was who told Luther, "You have chosen a hard road, Little Monk."

Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Surely he's been around long enough for you recognize his act, P/T?

[Image: 25plg6c.jpg]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Notice how he didn't answer the reply.

This is why using "ignore" is for pussies and charlatans.

As Frank Herbert wrote in Dune, "Those who see only what they wish are doomed to rot in the stink of their own perceptions."

Randy has chosen that route.

Can't remember who it was who told Luther, "You have chosen a hard road, Little Monk."

Parkers Tan, you know I love ya, but I can't blame Randy for ignoring ad hominem posts. He's here to have a discussion with people who genuinely want to discuss these issues.  Shy
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 11:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(July 9, 2015 at 10:57 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Notice how he didn't answer the reply.

This is why using "ignore" is for pussies and charlatans.

As Frank Herbert wrote in Dune, "Those who see only what they wish are doomed to rot in the stink of their own perceptions."

Randy has chosen that route.

Can't remember who it was who told Luther, "You have chosen a hard road, Little Monk."

Parkers Tan, you know I love ya, but I can't blame Randy for ignoring ad hominem posts. He's here to have a discussion with people who genuinely want to discuss these issues.  Shy
No he wants to preach at people.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 9, 2015 at 9:21 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Yadda yadda yadda

Purely supposition and opinion. No evidence, not a fact one.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jesus' resurrection was prophesized? Fake Messiah 28 7136 December 2, 2025 at 7:37 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 8338 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 28122 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 47801 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 29221 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 22549 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 64992 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 56315 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 35988 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 693200 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand



Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)