(July 13, 2015 at 10:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(July 12, 2015 at 9:46 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Quite the same way some anonymous guy with the screen-name Huggy74 does, you dumb sonofabitch. You are one of a block.  And the respondents are, as well.

If you wish to impugn his faith, or theirs, because he and they are online and anonymous, you must impugn your own.

Any more questions, Einstein?

Look muppet, it's very simple, he doesn't speak for all Christians (in case you haven't figured it out, all Christians don't agree on the same things). If that's the case I'll just go ahead and lump you in the same group with your statutory rape defending atheist buddies.

PT=Muppet

I'm thinking bunson. (Because he does not have eyes/Pt is blind to things he does not want to see)

(July 13, 2015 at 11:14 am)Drich Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 10:55 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Look muppet, it's very simple, he doesn't speak for all Christians (in case you haven't figured it out, all Christians don't agree on the same things). If that's the case I'll just go ahead and lump you in the same group with your statutory rape defending atheist buddies.

PT=Muppet

I'm thinking bunson. (Because he does not have eyes/Pt is blind to things he does not want to see)

Damn it. This is the second time I've seen this today.


Muppets are people. Stop using the term "Muppet" as derogatory. It is racist and inconsiderate. My familiar and close friend Doofer is a Muppet, and he's very sensitive about this kind of thing. I would hate for him to start a profile on here and see this kind of conduct because his feelings could get hurt. I realize the language rules around here are lax, but this is hate speech. Just because no muppets are around right now to be offended by it, doesn't make it ok.

(July 13, 2015 at 11:23 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 11:14 am)Drich Wrote:
PT=Muppet

I'm thinking bunson. (Because he does not have eyes/Pt is blind to things he does not want to see)

Damn it. This is the second time I've seen this today.


Muppets are people. Stop using the term "Muppet" as derogatory. It is racist and inconsiderate. My familiar and close friend Doofer is a Muppet, and he's very sensitive about this kind of thing. I would hate for him to start a profile on here and see this kind of conduct because his feelings could get hurt. I realize the language rules around here are lax, but this is hate speech. Just because no muppets are around right now to be offended by it, doesn't make it ok.

...And now we have a matched set, as we now have our beaker as well!

(pink and meeps incoherently at everything)

(July 12, 2015 at 11:21 am)Drich Wrote:

(July 12, 2015 at 11:09 am)Minimalist Wrote: Or so says asshole...probably a man.

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/07/right-wi...sus-happy/

How is submitting to sex rape?

Maybe you just have a different understand of the word, than rest of society.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/re...-questions

Maybe you should define rape

a women shouldnt have to submit to sex to make her husband happy... sex has to be consensual... married or not.
Some women react differently to rape than others... instead of fighthing, some women "freeze" and therefore submit to it.. that doesnt me she's consenting to it.. it's still rape...
Rape
[reyp]
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

(July 13, 2015 at 12:09 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote:

(July 12, 2015 at 11:21 am)Drich Wrote: How is submitting to sex rape?

Maybe you just have a different understand of the word, than rest of society.

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/re...-questions

Maybe you should define rape

a women shouldnt have to submit to sex to make her husband happy... sex has to be consensual... married or not.
Some women react differently to rape than others... instead of fighthing, some women "freeze" and therefore submit to it.. that doesnt me she's consenting to it.. it's still rape...
Rape
[reyp]
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

Seriously?!??!

I posted the federal statue/Defination of the word rape. Why? Because of your definition. "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" So again if the law/Federal Guideline' says consent is needed, and the passage in 1 cor 7 urges BOTH Husbands and WIVES to give consent if the other NEEDS to Have Sex then No law has been broken!

(July 13, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Drich Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 12:09 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote: a women shouldnt have to submit to sex to make her husband happy... sex has to be consensual... married or not.
Some women react differently to rape than others... instead of fighthing, some women "freeze" and therefore submit to it.. that doesnt me she's consenting to it.. it's still rape...
Rape
[reyp]
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

Seriously?!??!

I posted the federal statue/Defination of the word rape. Why? Because of your definition. "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" So again if the law/Federal Guideline' says consent is needed, and the passage in 1 cor 7 urges BOTH Husbands and WIVES to give consent if the other NEEDS to Have Sex then No law has been broken!

ah.. but of course... if he NEEDS to have sex, SHE has to consent... how could I have missed that... uh yes your honor, she consented.. i needed it.. i needed it bad....
BTW, scripture doesnt mean or prove anything...

(July 13, 2015 at 1:44 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Drich Wrote:

Seriously?!??!

I posted the federal statue/Defination of the word rape. Why? Because of your definition. "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" So again if the law/Federal Guideline' says consent is needed, and the passage in 1 cor 7 urges BOTH Husbands and WIVES to give consent if the other NEEDS to Have Sex then No law has been broken!

ah.. but of course... if he NEEDS to have sex, SHE has to consent... how could I have missed that... uh yes your honor, she consented.. i needed it.. i needed it bad....
BTW, scripture doesnt mean or prove anything...

This is your 1 Cor 7...
4 The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

I call bullshit....  one line contradicts the other.. back to back...
just sayin

Per the OP: Okay Girls.....Jesus Wants You to Fuck Like Bunnies

Next! No waiting here ladies.

(July 13, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Drich Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 12:09 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote: a women shouldnt have to submit to sex to make her husband happy... sex has to be consensual... married or not.
Some women react differently to rape than others... instead of fighthing, some women "freeze" and therefore submit to it.. that doesnt me she's consenting to it.. it's still rape...
Rape
[reyp]
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

Seriously?!??!

I posted the federal statue/Defination of the word rape. Why? Because of your definition. "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" So again if the law/Federal Guideline' says consent is needed, and the passage in 1 cor 7 urges BOTH Husbands and WIVES to give consent if the other NEEDS to Have Sex then No law has been broken!

How is not wanting to have sex consent, exactly?

(July 13, 2015 at 1:06 pm)Drich Wrote:

(July 13, 2015 at 12:09 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote: a women shouldnt have to submit to sex to make her husband happy... sex has to be consensual... married or not.
Some women react differently to rape than others... instead of fighthing, some women "freeze" and therefore submit to it.. that doesnt me she's consenting to it.. it's still rape...
Rape
[reyp]
noun
1.
unlawful sexual intercourse or any other sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth of another person, with or without force, by a sex organ, other body part, or foreign object, without the consent of the victim.

Seriously?!??!

I posted the federal statue/Defination of the word rape. Why? Because of your definition. "UNLAWFUL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE" So again if the law/Federal Guideline' says consent is needed, and the passage in 1 cor 7 urges BOTH Husbands and WIVES to give consent if the other NEEDS to Have Sex then No law has been broken!

Women should stay far, far away from you. At the risk of putting words in your mouth, your logic is basically this: "I realize that the law requires consent, but the Holly Bibble says wives and husbands have to consent to each other, so married people pretty much can't rape each other unless it's a legitimate, forcibly applied rape (and even then I would argue that she should have just given it up because he obviously needed it if he was acting that way over it...also, what was she wearing?)"

Translation: "I expect to be able to drop the word 'need' to make my wife consent to having sex with me. If it hurts for some reason, I'll promise to make it quick and fuck her anyway."

I certainly hope you don't actually treat your wife this way. That poor woman.