Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 2, 2024, 4:43 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
That's a non-sequitur.
Her question was:
What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more?  And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
The you'll know some day approach is one of the last resorts of Christians without proof. Next comes, well really in your secret heart you already to believe.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
I thought that was more of a Protestant thing, I guess Catholics do it also.

Edit- Now that I think about it, why can't we know now? What is with this game of divine peek a boo?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
The Bible, like all holy books and religious writings are myths reflecting the societies in the times of which they were concocted.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Randy, will anything convince you to become an atheist? If you've answered no, then you're just trying to convert people. You're being intellectually dishonest.
If pinkie pie isn't real, then how do you explain the existence of ponies, huh? If ponies are real, then that's proof that Pinkie Pie is real. Checkmate, christians!  Heart
_______________________________
Let's stop fighting and and start smiling! This is our one and only life to live... let's be friends and live it with smiles! Big Grin

-- Book of Pinkie Pie 7:3
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 6:22 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote: Randy, something has been bugging me about this thread from the very beginning.  It's not just that your minimal facts do not prove Jesus rose from the dead even IF they were all true.  They wouldn't.  But you are claiming they prove the resurrection.  Resurrection is a much, much larger claim.  Many atheists or members of other religions may not know that, but I do, and I suspect you do too.  Resurrection is being raised from the dead to everlasting life.  What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more?  And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

Would you believe me if I said He does?

[Image: no.gif]

Not until he says, "Hi!" to you personally. Then, everyone in this forum will turn on you because you will have NO evidence.

But you will have KNOW evidence, and it will change your life.

Try again, slick.  Evidence is derived from the word 'evident'.  Evidence is only evidence if it is evident to others.  God tapping Jenny on the shoulder and saying "Hi" isn't evidence unless it's observed by someone else.  And, even then, that's only evidence of someone/thing interacting with her, not of your god.  That requires much more evidence, evidence which must eliminate other possibilities from being the most likely explanation.
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 8:48 pm)Jenny A Wrote:
(July 17, 2015 at 6:22 pm)Randy Carson Wrote: Would you believe me if I said He does?

[Image: no.gif]

Not until he says, "Hi!" to you personally. Then, everyone in this forum will turn on you because you will have NO evidence.

But you will have KNOW evidence, and it will change your life.


But about that resurrection. . . .

I look forward to discussing that!
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 9:03 pm)Pizza Wrote: That's a non-sequitur.
Her question was:
What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more?  And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

As God, Jesus is eternal. As man, he cannot die again.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Jesus isn't god, you stupid anthropomorphite. Tongue
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 9:06 pm)Jenny A Wrote: The you'll know some day approach is one of the last resorts of Christians without proof.  Next comes, well really in your secret heart you already to believe.

Not really. It's just sort of the "buck stops here" kind of an answer because after death, we're all going to know.

But no, there are all sorts of proofs and evidence...it's just a matter of finding that which speaks to you.

For example, in another thread, you mentioned the Teleological argument as being the one that you find most intriguing.

But in that same thread, other people mentioned other arguments as speaking to them more.

Isn't that interesting? This means that "one size does not fit all", and the reason that apologists offer a variety of proofs and arguments is because it's hard to say in advance what will make an impression on someone.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 2886 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 6892 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16141 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 15975 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 12111 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 38394 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 25853 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 18526 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 335403 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7357 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)