Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 1, 2024, 7:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 7 Vote(s) - 1.57 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Not sure what's going on, but I'm very pleased to hear you are happy my friend Smile
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 16, 2015 at 11:27 am)Stimbo Wrote: No, not that!

Not quite that...

Not yet.

Angel

All I can say is, my head's spinning at how quickly things have been, and are still, escalating.

Let them take their due course... don't push them... don't take them for granted.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Here's a thought.

Is the magical parts of the NT supposed to be:

(A) A historical account by people

or

(B) Revelation from god to people

In case A, it is subject to normal human historical criteria. Extraordinary claim, pitiful evidence, fail.

In case B, we're relying on God telling the truth. How can we possibly know God would tell us the truth? We can't. Because God says so about himself? This is circular reasoning. We can't know it's true unless we investigate it ourselves, putting us back to (A).
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Randy, something has been bugging me about this thread from the very beginning. It's not just that your minimal facts do not prove Jesus rose from the dead even IF they were all true. They wouldn't. But you are claiming they prove the resurrection. Resurrection is a much, much larger claim. Many atheists or members of other religions may not know that, but I do, and I suspect you do too. Resurrection is being raised from the dead to everlasting life. What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more? And if he is still alive, why don't he write? Make an appearance? Say hi?
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote: And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

I bet you anything, you will get the standard answer to that kind of question: He does, to the ones being open to him.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 4:57 pm)abaris Wrote:
(July 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote: And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

I bet you anything, you will get the standard answer to that kind of question: He does, to the ones being open to him.

I've already received that answer from a number of Christians and a couple Muslims.  That's the standard answer of the woo claimant.  If you don't believe already you will not see.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
Yes. It never fails to amaze me how much evidence you can find if only you are willing to fabricate it yourself. Truly fascinating phenomenon.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 5:01 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: Yes. It never fails to amaze me how much evidence you can find if only you are willing to fabricate it yourself. Truly fascinating phenomenon.
The power of confirmation bias is horrifying.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote: Randy, something has been bugging me about this thread from the very beginning.  It's not just that your minimal facts do not prove Jesus rose from the dead even IF they were all true.  They wouldn't.  But you are claiming they prove the resurrection.  Resurrection is a much, much larger claim.  Many atheists or members of other religions may not know that, but I do, and I suspect you do too.  Resurrection is being raised from the dead to everlasting life.  What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more?  And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

Would you believe me if I said He does?

[Image: no.gif]

Not until he says, "Hi!" to you personally. Then, everyone in this forum will turn on you because you will have NO evidence.

But you will have KNOW evidence, and it will change your life.
Reply
RE: Proving The Resurrection By the Minimal Facts Approach
(July 17, 2015 at 6:22 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:
(July 17, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Jenny A Wrote: Randy, something has been bugging me about this thread from the very beginning.  It's not just that your minimal facts do not prove Jesus rose from the dead even IF they were all true.  They wouldn't.  But you are claiming they prove the resurrection.  Resurrection is a much, much larger claim.  Many atheists or members of other religions may not know that, but I do, and I suspect you do too.  Resurrection is being raised from the dead to everlasting life.  What in any of your "facts" even suggests that Jesus will be alive forever more?  And if he is still alive, why don't he write?  Make an appearance?  Say hi?

Would you believe me if I said He does?

[Image: no.gif]

Not until he says, "Hi!" to you personally. Then, everyone in this forum will turn on you because you will have NO evidence.

But you will have KNOW evidence, and it will change your life.


But about that resurrection. . . .
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proving evolution? LinuxGal 24 3003 March 19, 2023 at 10:36 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  What will win the god wars? Faith, Fantasy, Facts, or God? Greatest I am 98 7138 December 28, 2020 at 12:01 pm
Last Post: Greatest I am
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16908 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Travis Walton versus The Resurrection. Jehanne 61 16150 November 29, 2017 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Why do Christians believe in the Resurrection of Jesus but not alien abductions? Jehanne 72 12216 June 27, 2016 at 1:54 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink
  We can be certain of NO resurrection - A Response Randy Carson 136 38978 October 2, 2015 at 4:10 am
Last Post: Aractus
  Disproving The Resurrection By The Maximal Facts Approach BrianSoddingBoru4 160 26210 July 5, 2015 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: Jenny A
  Obama and the simulated resurrection professor 116 18783 April 25, 2015 at 10:39 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2) His_Majesty 1617 346402 January 12, 2015 at 5:58 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part Ad Neuseum) YahwehIsTheWay 32 7401 December 11, 2014 at 4:58 pm
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)