Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 8:27 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
#11
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
It may be so loki, but from there to assume goddidit and try to portray what that god's will is, its a really giant leap.
Reply
#12
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
(November 4, 2010 at 11:38 pm)Ervin Wrote: My question to the atheists is why atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort?

Because I don't believe in god, this automaticly classes me as an atheist. Also I'm not claiming that there is a god or not and state that I do not and cannot know whether there be a god, so this also makes me agnostic. I don't know whether there is a god or not, and I lack belief in it. I need evidence.
I'm an agnostic atheist.
Simple.

I'd just like to note that I have a very strong lack of belief. As I'm 99.99999+ sure that there is no god. Due to lack of credibility, evidence, logic and reasoning. I consider the whole god thing to be extremely idiotic and so I require extraordinary evidence to support such an incredible idea. God is on the same credibility level as any fictional character that can be thought up. Which is why I reject it so quickly and strongly.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan

Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.

Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.

You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Reply
#13
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
I'm an agnostic atheist, even though I say that I believe there are no god(s) in existence and never have been. I am 99.999% convinced that there is no such thing as a god, but I can't honestly say that I know for certain. That's pretty much the definition of agnostic atheist. I personally find the agnostic part to go without saying, and so I simply identify myself as an atheist.

Others have mentioned the complete and utter lack of evidence to support the claims of god(s) existence (philosophical "evidence" doesn't count, as it is simply mental gymnastics in action), but beyond the lack of evidence... there is the complete and utter lack of reasons to believe. I have never been presented with a reason to believe that god(s) exist that wasn't a form of wishful thinking or that didn't require god to exist (e.g. 'If you don't believe, you'll go to hell'... only works if god is real).
Reply
#14
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
(November 5, 2010 at 6:17 am)solja247 Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, everything needs a cause except god, are you enumerating fallacies as you post? On this small phrase you conveyed two: a special pleading (everything needs a cause, that cause is god, but god didn't need a cause) and yet again an argument from ignorance (since you don't know the cause, therefore its god, avoiding other possible explanations).

Whether you like it or not. PHILOSOPHICALLY, there had to be an uncaused cause, it would go like this, the universe had a cause, that cause had a cause, that cause had a cause x infinity. To make sense we have to say there was an uncaused cause.

Unless the universe is infinite and eternal and it's uncaused then the philosophical argument for god falls from there
Reply
#15
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
Because agnostic means I think there could be a god, and I don't.
Reply
#16
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
(November 5, 2010 at 6:17 am)solja247 Wrote:
Quote:Yeah, everything needs a cause except god, are you enumerating fallacies as you post? On this small phrase you conveyed two: a special pleading (everything needs a cause, that cause is god, but god didn't need a cause) and yet again an argument from ignorance (since you don't know the cause, therefore its god, avoiding other possible explanations).

Whether you like it or not. PHILOSOPHICALLY, there had to be an uncaused cause, it would go like this, the universe had a cause, that cause had a cause, that cause had a cause x infinity. To make sense we have to say there was an uncaused cause.

Philosophically?? you actually make such an "argument" with a straight face? Philosophically there had to be no uncaused cause. So there.
Reply
#17
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
Here's how I would phrase it. Atheism is a lack of a belief in a deity. Theism is the belief in a deity that is active in the world. Deism is the belief in an uncaused cause sort of god that left the universe to work like clockwork ( for the record most of the founding fathers were deists. Being a deist back then was like being an atheist today in a sense. ). Those are statements of BELIEF.

Agnostic is not a statement of belief, but an epistemological statement. That's a statement about what you KNOW or CAN know ( or at least think you can know ). One could believe that their knowledge is not 100% certain ( agnostic ) but still believe in God and be a theist. One can also be an atheist and an agnostic.

Richard Dawkins has a scale in the God Delusion about belief, with Gnostic theists ( not the old sect, I mean, as in knowing ) being number one and gnostic atheists at 7. Everything in between is technically some variety of agnostic.
Reply
#18
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
(November 5, 2010 at 11:39 am)The Skeptic Wrote: Richard Dawkins has a scale in the God Delusion about belief, with Gnostic theists ( not the old sect, I mean, as in knowing ) being number one and gnostic atheists at 7. Everything in between is technically some variety of agnostic.
I agree with your post entirely apart from the inclusion of this bit. Dawkins' scale mixes the terms "knowledge" and "certainty" without any regard for what they imply. He also likens a "pure agnostic" (the middle position on his scale) to the belief that "God’s existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."

It's a terrible scale for what it is supposed to do. Try this one instead: http://atheistforums.org/thread-3817.html (shameless plug)
Reply
#19
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
I am agnostic in the sense that I cannot be certain that there is no god. Arguments against are not conclusive. However, I don't believe that God's existence is equiprobable to his non-existence, so I'm not agnostic in the common sense of the word. So, I suppose I am a 'probabilistic agnostic atheist'.

Simples.
'We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.' H.L. Mencken

'False religion' is the ultimate tautology.

'It is just like man's vanity and impertinence to call an animal dumb because it is dumb to his dull perceptions.' Mark Twain

'I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it.' Abraham Lincoln
Reply
#20
RE: Why Atheism instead of agnosticism of some sort
(November 5, 2010 at 11:50 am)Tiberius Wrote:
(November 5, 2010 at 11:39 am)The Skeptic Wrote: Richard Dawkins has a scale in the God Delusion about belief, with Gnostic theists ( not the old sect, I mean, as in knowing ) being number one and gnostic atheists at 7. Everything in between is technically some variety of agnostic.
I agree with your post entirely apart from the inclusion of this bit. Dawkins' scale mixes the terms "knowledge" and "certainty" without any regard for what they imply. He also likens a "pure agnostic" (the middle position on his scale) to the belief that "God’s existence and non-existence are exactly equiprobable."

It's a terrible scale for what it is supposed to do. Try this one instead: http://atheistforums.org/thread-3817.html (shameless plug)

Yeah, that scale seems a bit better. If Dawkins was a professional philosopher it would probably be better. He's a biologist though, so for his philosophical venture in the God Delusion, I was pretty impressed.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Exclamation Why Atheism is Incoherent & You Aren't as Smart as You Think You Are Seax 60 6824 March 19, 2021 at 9:43 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Why do some people condone hell? SuicideCommando01 45 7654 May 22, 2020 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Why do some believers claim that all religions are just as good? Der/die AtheistIn 22 4470 June 25, 2018 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Create a new monotheistic religion instead of clinging to the past of Abraham Kaloomi 68 11764 June 18, 2018 at 11:30 pm
Last Post: Astreja
  Why are some moderate religious afraid of atheism? Der/die AtheistIn 38 6561 February 26, 2018 at 8:45 am
Last Post: Cod
  Why some humans are so evil: double standards and irreligion WinterHold 124 23725 January 28, 2018 at 5:38 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Don't like saying "I'm an atheist"? Try this instead. Gawdzilla Sama 40 9229 January 22, 2018 at 6:53 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Why do some moderates get so attached to other believers? Der/die AtheistIn 4 1425 December 19, 2017 at 9:28 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do some religious people think the world revolves around them? Cecelia 28 10566 June 3, 2017 at 11:57 am
Last Post: J a c k
  Why don't Christians admire/LOVE SATAN instead of the biblical God? ProgrammingGodJordan 18 4249 January 21, 2017 at 8:13 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)