RE: How does religion explain birth defects?
November 10, 2010 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 10, 2010 at 7:41 pm by TheDarkestOfAngels.)
(November 10, 2010 at 5:42 pm)Rayaan Wrote: Well, some people are born with physical abnormalities because it was simply God's will. And there might be a good reason for why He made them like that. It doesn't always have to be because of humanity's sins or as a test of our faith. He can fashion His creatures in any way He wants to make them, such as this, this, this, and this, for example. And this. There are much more medical oddities that I've seen and I look at all of them as creations of God.That's... horrifying.
Sometimes I even find them fascinating because their bodies are so strange and unique (as compared to regular human beings).
Birth defects aren't proof or disproof of god's existance. They're disproof of what people regularly call 'god's everlasting/eternal love of humankind.'
This isn't just about the cosmetic or even mildly debilitating disease - this is also about diseases like those I brought up in the previous page -
a) Tay-Sachs disease
b) Niemann-Pick disease
c) Trisomy 18 and 13
d) Cystic Fibrosis
Let's take Tay-Sachs - the one that's a genetic defect where if your child has it, your child is doomed to a horrifying and painful death before the age of 18 months, so I'm glad you find the forms of those listed birth defects amusing, becuase I don't.
I don't find them amusing at all.
In the grand scheme of things, if god does exist, then have no power against a being that's anywhere close to that kind of omnipotence and frankly he can do to us whatever he wants and we couldn't do anything about it. As such, if he wants to do with us as he pleases, then there's nothing we can do to stop a being of that nature.
However, a being that willingly inflicts lethal and painfully fatal genetic diseases upon beings he considers his own creations - let alone the comparatively cosmetic issues highlighted above in your post - then it doesn't strike me with any positive emotions toward god. That just makes him a worse monster than any depiction of the Devil and certainly any human being I've ever known.
(November 10, 2010 at 5:42 pm)Rayaan Wrote: When an atheist sees people like that, he thinks to himself, "There we go, that's another reason for God's non-existence." But when a believer sees people like that, he feels more thankful to God for not having those problems himself. Then he thinks about all the other healthy and normal people in the world as opposed to the abnormal ones, whereas an atheist would only concentrate on the negative aspects to prove that God doesn't exist, and not take into account how much people are being born everyday without any problems.No, it's not an arguement of or against god's existance.
I think God made evil and suffering to make us reflect on the good things as well, because without any suffering in the world, we won't be able to truly appreciate the good things in life. There are opposite things in the world just like there is night and day, love and hate, ugly and beauty, hot and cold, happiness and sadness, etc. And these polar qualities exist to make us more aware of the dual nature of life. That's why we shouldn't expect everything to be perfect all the time. So, the problem of evil is not a very strong argument for the non-existence of God.
It's a powerful arguement for god being evil at a scale beyond any fictional or real being.
(Nevermind the genocides and other god-sanctioned actions in the Koran and Bible).
If today you can take a thing like evolution and make it a crime to teach in the public schools, tomorrow you can make it a crime to teach it in the private schools and next year you can make it a crime to teach it to the hustings or in the church. At the next session you may ban books and the newspapers...
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925
Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan
Ignorance and fanaticism are ever busy and need feeding. Always feeding and gloating for more. Today it is the public school teachers; tomorrow the private. The next day the preachers and the lecturers, the magazines, the books, the newspapers. After a while, Your Honor, it is the setting of man against man and creed against creed until with flying banners and beating drums we are marching backward to the glorious ages of the sixteenth centry when bigots lighted fagots to burn the men who dared to bring any intelligence and enlightenment and culture to the human mind. ~Clarence Darrow, at the Scopes Monkey Trial, 1925
Politics is supposed to be the second-oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. ~Ronald Reagan