Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 9:44 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
#31
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
(October 20, 2015 at 10:35 pm)Kitan Wrote: Wow, it sounded so grammatically incorrect, though.  xD

I think that's the point, though. What a wonderful word...
Reply
#32
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
(October 20, 2015 at 10:29 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:
(October 20, 2015 at 9:19 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Y'all have your own cons like thinking that atheism is the only rational position.

Believing despite the lack of evidence and in the face of contrary evidence isn't exactly rational.

The simple statement, “atheism is the rational response to a lack of evidence’, presupposes ontological and/or epistemological naturalism. However, the tools of naturalistic inquiry do not allow anyone to step outside naturalism to confirm its veracity. From a purely logical perspective it is no different than quoting Scripture to confirm the reliability of Scripture.
Reply
#33
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
Indeed, love comes before logic because we are emotional creatures first, and rational creatures second. However what comes from religion is not love, but something that appears to the religious brain like love does to the brain of a person in a relationship with a real person. The acts and thoughts of the believer generate a response in the brain which is pleasurable and psychologically addictive. It is like love in that way, except the object of such brain behaviors is wholly imaginary.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#34
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
True, genuine, non-desperate, non-attached, deep and meaningful love with real persons is rare. But I do love it when it is found. And it need not last forever, but it's worth every second that it lasts Smile
Reply
#35
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
I was speaking about love in a more abstract way as in most value. Some people love transcendent principles like Justice and value it more than their own lives. As such all the resources of their intellect will be directed towards it such as defining and then discerning it. The same rule applies for truth, pleasure, security, self esteem, liberty, etc. I think an honest look at what pious people most value versus what nominal believers would reveal a big difference in where their reason leads them. Likewise confirmed nonbelievers versus earnest seekers.
Reply
#36
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
(October 21, 2015 at 2:05 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: I was speaking about love in a more abstract way as in most value. Some people love transcendent principles like Justice and value it more than their own lives. As such all the resources of their intellect will be directed towards it such as defining and then discerning it. The same rule applies for truth, pleasure, security, self esteem, liberty, etc. I think an honest look at what pious people most value versus what nominal believers would reveal a big difference in where their reason leads them. Likewise confirmed nonbelievers versus earnest seekers.

Am I hearing the echo of a No True Scotsman amongst those words? I believe I am.

"Only real men believe in God!"
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#37
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
Come now, you know better than to cut off discussion by crying “No True Scotsman” especially when I wasn’t even going there. It is a fact of life that what people do and say in public does not always match what they truly believe or reveal their motivating desires. One philanthropist may donate funds in order to aggrandize himself. Another may do so because of his genuine concern for the beneficiaries. Who is the more generous person? In accordance with this line of reasoning, I think a pious believer has more in common with an earnest seeker than with a nominal believer. Both a pious believer and an earnest seeker have a desire to understand principles and truths that may go beyond what is merely apparent. Likewise a nominal believer and confirmed non-believer have many similarities. Both look to and put their trust in their own powers and seek comfort and gain only within the natural sphere. I’m not trying to be judgmental; I have throughout my life been at least three of the above: nominal believer, seeker, and confirmed non-believer. I’m still working on achieving actual piety.

In many ways my belief that ‘love comes before logic’ is similar to Godchild’s ASK (Ask Seek Knock). Before you can know the truth you must first want to know the truth. If you’re not interested in asking the question, “Is there more?” then it’s not surprising that all of your reasoning will not reveal anything more to you than what you think there already is. Nor will you seriously entertain arguments suggesting otherwise; the slightest problem will serve as the basis for dismissing an opposing view. For example I often feel that many atheists are too quick to dismiss rational demonstrations of God and justify those dismissals with the slimmest objections. Likewise if you hope to find more, then all of your reasoning will be directed to finding something and you won’t stop until you find it. There can be little doubt that some people fool themselves with the ‘answer that satisfies’. For example, I feel too many believers are too quick to enthusiastically embrace highly suspect Kalam-style proofs.

Nevertheless perseverance often gets rewarded with genuine truths. It took quite a bit of challenging study for me to gain enough confidence to stand-up as a believer. If it were possible to determine, I would be willing to lay money down that my conversion from atheist to theist was the result of deeper and more thorough intellectual consideration that most AF members did to de-convert.
Reply
#38
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
(October 21, 2015 at 4:14 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Come now, you know better than to cut off discussion by crying “No True Scotsman” especially when I wasn’t even going there.

I for one wouldn't do that. But your original argument seems rather weak to me. That's why I didn't reply to it the first time round. Theists claim to have values, but I often find them despicable and exclusive. Such as supporting capital punishment, looking down on the poor and needy, or going all out bigot on people not conforming with their world view.

That's why no true scottsman comes in with a vengeance. I for one despise Sam Harris or Ayn Rand, but I own up to them being or having been atheists. See, it doesn't make someone anything because you think so. What makes them is what they identify with.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#39
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
You are misapplying NTS. The fallacy applies either 1)when a proponent excludes one particular type from the kind to which it belongs on the basis of an accidental feature or 2) when an opponent expands the definition of the kind to include accidental features.
Reply
#40
RE: Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion?
(October 20, 2015 at 3:18 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: The question came up and I thought it worth exploring. I put this thread in the psychology form because I’d like to discuss it from that angle rather than from religion.

Why do otherwise intelligent people fall for religion? Why doesn’t the logic and reason immediately preclude gullibility? One might ask why otherwise intelligent people scratch mosquito bites.  Answer that question and you’ll be closer to answering the other.


The answer is to be found in the word "otherwise".
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1322 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2458 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 6017 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 14269 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1405 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 25177 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman
Lightbulb Intelligent Design, Proof V Muslim Scholar 75 47452 June 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Intelligent Design, Proof IV Muslim Scholar 97 53777 June 19, 2013 at 7:44 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design, Proof III Muslim Scholar 61 30821 May 29, 2013 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Esquilax
  So much for "intelligent design" KichigaiNeko 36 17235 April 23, 2013 at 9:35 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)