Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 11:41 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
#21
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 3:35 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: I'd note however, in the last few hundred years, there have been many calculations made pertaining to undiscovered planets.  The 'best' instance would be those of Adams and Leverrier that led to the discovery of Neptune.

Unfortunately, despite a huge pile of mathematics, and a seeming score with Pluto, it turns out that case was actually spurious, Pluto is not sufficiently massive to have been noodled to exist via the maths. The Lowell Observatory had announced several possible locations for a ninth planet, so their assertions in regard to Pluto are somewhat diluted as a result, and then when the mass was determined, the Lowell Observatory predictions were all nulled out.

A really 'large' planet out there, and not in the plane of the ecliptic, is seemingly ruled out via dynamical effects not seen on the known planets, btw.

As for this 10 earth masser, Idunno.  This prediction actually, to me, gets more plausible the further  out it might be.

The problem I see is:

1. It is hard to imagine a planet that massive forming that far out, given the spareness of the available material even during formative years of the solar system.

2. If it formed close in and was somehow thrown to such an extended orbit through gravitational interaction with other planets, it's perihelion should still be somewhere close to where it's original orbit was. It's not clear to me what could have pumped its perihelion so far out from where it was formed.
Reply
#22
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 8:51 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(January 20, 2016 at 7:42 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: inb4 Quran miraculously predicts our solar system has this many planets. Btw Pluto is planet.

Yeah, as far as I'm concerned Pluto should get planet status back, if only for reasons of tradition.

Then all the plutoids similar in size to Pluto should also get planet status. Definition should have real meaning besides nostalgia.
Reply
#23
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
That's true; but I specifically stipluated reasons of tradition, rather than strict scientific accuracy. Basically the same sort of reason that The Plough is recognised as an entity in its own right, despite its more accurate status as an asterism of Ursa Major.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
#24
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
I thought it was gonna be

"We've changed our mind about Pluto again."
Reply
#25
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Evie Wrote: I thought it was gonna be

"We've changed our mind about Pluto again."
The dog?
Which is better:
To die with ignorance, or to live with intelligence?

Truth doesn't accommodate to personal opinions.
The choice is yours. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is God and there is man, it's only a matter of who created whom

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The more questions you ask, the more you realize that disagreement is inevitable, and communication of this disagreement, irrelevant.
Reply
#26
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 10:33 pm)Stimbo Wrote: That's true; but I specifically stipluated reasons of tradition, rather than strict scientific accuracy. Basically the same sort of reason that The Plough is recognised as an entity in its own right, despite its more accurate status as an asterism of Ursa Major.

That's a name, not a classification.  A name can contain any degree of tradition desired.  A classification should be useful first.

If any plutoids similar in size to Pluto qualifies as a planet, it reduces the usefulness of the planet classification, since Pluto is really a very minor body and probably quite average for a plutoids and there could well be hundred or even thousands plutoids not far smaller than Pluto.
Reply
#27
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 1:33 pm)robvalue Wrote: Is it called Rupert?

It's a giant bear with unfashionable trousers?
Reply
#28
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 8:51 pm)Stimbo Wrote:
(January 20, 2016 at 7:42 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: inb4 Quran miraculously predicts our solar system has this many planets. Btw Pluto is planet.

Yeah, as far as I'm concerned Pluto should get planet status back, if only for reasons of tradition.

And the term "atom" should be reserved for a truly indivisible object, because philosophical tradition! Bwahahahaha!!!
Reply
#29
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 10:37 pm)Heat Wrote:
(January 20, 2016 at 10:35 pm)Evie Wrote: I thought it was gonna be

"We've changed our mind about Pluto again."
The dog?

No, silly.

The nemesis of Popeye!

Oh fuck, that's Bluto! I always wondered why I never saw Bluto woof and lick his own testicles while spinning on his axis and having his own Zodiac called "Nemesis of Spinachman".

What I just said makes perfect sense okay?
Reply
#30
RE: New evidence points toward Ninth Planet in the solar system
(January 20, 2016 at 10:33 pm)Stimbo Wrote: That's true; but I specifically stipluated reasons of tradition, rather than strict scientific accuracy. Basically the same sort of reason that The Plough is recognised as an entity in its own right, despite its more accurate status as an asterism of Ursa Major.

The IANA cares more about rational classifications than tradition - and I'm pretty sure they don't recognize The Plough / Big Dipper at all. AFAIK, they don't name asterisms.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Our Sun is approaching its solar maximum. Jehanne 3 751 March 24, 2022 at 2:12 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Evidence for ET? Jehanne 83 9321 November 25, 2018 at 9:38 am
Last Post: Jehanne
  Newborn planet pictured for first time zebo-the-fat 15 2734 July 3, 2018 at 9:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  So, What planet/moon is this ? vorlon13 42 7086 November 26, 2017 at 9:35 am
Last Post: vorlon13
  How would you name Planet Nine? Fake Messiah 55 18139 July 19, 2017 at 10:21 am
Last Post: Astonished
  Earliest evidence of life on Earth 'found' Minimalist 6 2034 March 1, 2017 at 11:30 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Planet Found in Habitable Zone Around Nearest Star zebo-the-fat 72 9931 August 27, 2016 at 7:12 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Solar Eclipse. Science vs Pastor perspective TubbyTubby 22 5254 March 23, 2015 at 4:33 am
Last Post: Smaug
  The CMB and the 'Axis of Evil' - evidence of God? Angrboda 12 4508 March 6, 2015 at 8:01 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Evidence of plate tectonics on Europa Anomalocaris 1 862 September 9, 2014 at 6:04 pm
Last Post: StealthySkeptic



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)