There's an entire thread's worth of examples for anyone who has the stomach to wade through it.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 19, 2024, 1:44 am
Thread Rating:
Dr. Craig is a liar.
|
Or you can just save everyone time and just post ONE example, no need for a whole threads worth...
RE: Dr. Craig is a liar.
May 18, 2016 at 8:12 am
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2016 at 8:13 am by Huggy Bear.)
(May 18, 2016 at 8:12 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(May 17, 2016 at 7:08 pm)Jehanne Wrote: How is "god" different than the FSM? Or, is the FSM "god"? Except you know... there is no evidence of that happening also no historical evidence for the guys existence or family or anything the bible claims. So you might as well throw jesus in the same bin as FSM along with god.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code: <iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe> (May 18, 2016 at 8:12 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(May 17, 2016 at 7:08 pm)Jehanne Wrote: How is "god" different than the FSM? Or, is the FSM "god"? Those verses were not original to the ending of Mark; they were added later on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_16 Huggy74 Wrote:Mister Agenda Wrote:So you ARE using 'timeless' as in 'unaffected by the passage of time' when everyone else is using in they physics sense of 'no time existing'. That explains a lot. Re-read my post. I was very clear about which sense of the word is a contradiction and which was not. By using the word as a synonym for 'eternal', you're having a completely different conversation from the rest of us. We're talking about William Lane Craig's interpretations and expansion on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. In that argument, 'timeless' is used in the sense of 'there being no time'. If there's no contradiction, then you're off topic. We wouldn't need to be arguing semantics if you were using the term consistently with what's actually being discussed.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
Huggy74 Wrote:Jehanne Wrote:How is "god" different than the FSM? Or, is the FSM "god"? If anyone 'had enough faith to make it manifest', they'd do their healings in hospitals instead of tent revivals.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
(May 18, 2016 at 9:29 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:Huggy74 Wrote:For one, Jesus stated that the same works that he did, his followers would be able to do, No other religion makes that claim. All you need to do is find someone with enough faith to make it manifest. Or hey, how about a single documented case of an amputee regrowing a limb?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Dr. Craig is a liar.
May 18, 2016 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: May 18, 2016 at 9:41 am by Huggy Bear.)
(May 18, 2016 at 8:25 am)Jehanne Wrote:Actually the verse I referenced is found in John.(May 18, 2016 at 8:12 am)Huggy74 Wrote: For one, Jesus stated that the same works that he did, his followers would be able to do, No other religion makes that claim. All you need to do is find someone with enough faith to make it manifest. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. - John 14:12 Also your link only states what "most scholars believe" not what they can prove. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)