Love

[Joods]

And there you have it.

[Thomas Kelly252525]

It may be thought severely physically disabled people are a combination of ugly parts and beautiful parts.

Do you think they should be loved ?

Do you think they are attractive ?  

Do you think you may be pleased by the appearance of them ?

Do you think they deserve goodwill or to be treated with contempt ?

Do you think there is an unbiased way to judge them ?

Do you think someone may marry a severely disabled person ?

[Alex K]

I don't know what the hell is your deal, Thomas Kelly.

[robvalue]

You should be nice to everyone.

You don't have a duty to marry everyone.

[Thomas Kelly252525]

I don't know what the hell is your deal, Thomas Kelly.

Alex K,

Maybe the answer you were looking for is that it may appear to you that some people may be thinking there is no such thing as unbiased thinking and all is subjective and you may think that if a person doesn't have the ability to be unbiased then they can't be a reasonable person.

---

You should be nice to everyone.

You don't have a duty to marry everyone.

robvalue,

I think we should be free to choose if we want to marry or not.

Good-natured is another thing to think about.

[Thumpalumpacus]

If you think that I wasn't thinking that people have the potential to be bias or unbias, rational or irrational at different times, which words precisely may you think show that ?

Pointed questions have points, Thomas. The fact that you only communicate in questions doesn't necessarily mean that you're politely curious.

From this side of the monitor, it appears that you have beliefs that you are unwilling or unable to defend, and so rather than making statements of fact or opinion, you phrase it in the form of a question so that you can avoid espousing a position that may face dissent. You get to say, "But I was just asking!" which is basically what you're doing right at this moment. There's more than a touch of passive-aggressive twattery to such an approach. I personally find it enervating because you don't come across as a real person, but rather, someone pushing an agenda but lacking the courage to plainly espouse it.

To answer your question here, I suggest you read back through your own posts, with the above point in mind.

You made the claim. Lay out your metrics -- how you measure such percentages -- and then demonstrate that most thers hold the same metrics as you.

Thumpalumpacus,

If you think I made the claim, which words precisely may you think show that I did ?

Take responsibility for your own words. I have no respect for someone afraid to speak his mind.

I very rarely ignore people online. Congratulations, you've made that short list.

[Thumpalumpacus]

I don't know what the hell is your deal, Thomas Kelly.

He's a wind-up game.

[Alex K]

Are redheads human?

Should everyone be shot in the face?

Do people who can't sing have a right to live?


Those are questions.

[The Grand Nudger]

It might be thought that some people may be thinking that you should marry the ugliest girl you could find, possibly Thomas?  

[Spirian]

---

Are redheads human?

Should everyone be shot in the face?

Do people who can't sing have a right to live?


Those are questions.

1) Yes, except in the sack, where they turn into freaks.

2) No, only people who have been shot everywhere else first.

3) Yes, but they must never leave their showers.