(June 23, 2016 at 5:05 pm)abaris Wrote:(June 23, 2016 at 4:48 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: What? I'm supposed to bring up evangelical influence in Africa when talking about Muslim birthrates being higher then Atheist ones?
You were talking about breeding to be precise. Which is a wording to puke over. Breeding, I may repeat. Maybe I have a thin skin because of being half jewish, but tough luck. I don't accept that kind of terminology from anyone in real life and I certainly don't accept it from anyone on an internet forum. I consider anyone using it for any of their fellow humans to be a lowlife. I'm not here to win a popularity contest and so I'm certainly not playing nice nice when anyone sees fit to pound their right wing chest.
Breeding in the correct word to use for large groups of any kind. I see you ignored that I used it for both Atheists and Muslims, just picked out Muslims and called me a bigot and now a lowlife over using the technically correct term for large groups. Give birth wouldn't even make sense. Your problem I think is that rather then confront the ideas of people who believe differently then you and consider them, you just assume those people are bigots or racists or whatever. It's intellectually lazy to do that. The easy way to avoid talking about something that makes you uncomfortable, that Muslims are 'giving birth' at high rates then secular people. See that doesn't even sound right. I think you are just looking for reasons to not have to have a discussion, particularly because it ends with the fact you can't be in favor of Islam and gay-rights.