WikiLeaks publishes searchable database of almost 20,000 emails from DNC.

[ReptilianPeon]

Even after all that has happened, Hilary just recently thanked Debbie for all of her work over as head of the DNC in a speech and immediately gives her a job in her campaign for president:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_v_jcyaRTc

Hilary is doing everything she can to make Donald Trump win the election!!!!!!

Like I said before, Hilary is too arrogant for her own good. She's making damn sure Donald keeps his lead over her (currently 1% according to the Real Clear Politics average) in the polls. She will continue to spit at those who vote for Senator Sanders and may only win the election because she rigs it like she had the Democratic primary rigged.

[Rayaan]

I suspect it may jump back up when the debates start; somehow I can't see Trump holding his own against Clinton in a debate.

That's possible, but also we need to remember that people won't be persuaded just by the candidates' use of logic and reason. The non-verbal aspects also matter a lot because those influence people as well. In my opinion, and many others, Trump is a much better non-verbal communicator than Clinton. His face is more expressive and you can recognize the emotions in him more quickly. And having decades of experience in business negotiations, deals, and interactions with people, it's not inconceivable that over the years he developed all these different persuasion skills, like the ones below:

The 6 Persuasion Secrets of Donald Trump, According to Dilbert's Scott Adams

Trump's style of speaking is also quite different from that of Clinton's. His word choice and sentence structures are curiously simple (simple enough to be comprehended by a fourth-grader) and yet he tends to talk in a loose and fragmented manner that can perhaps be described only by chaos theory.

For Presidential Hopefuls, Simpler Language Resonates

Trump's Broken Speech Appeals to the Masses

So my point is, although Trump may have a worse logical coherence in the debates than Clinton, there are still some over-looked factors that can very likely boost his votes even more. Besides, Trump will have some newer arguments against Clinton this time (the same things which brought her votes down), like the email leaks and possibly other things that may surface in the near future.

He is likely to mention the recent national polls where he is leading Clinton to further motivate his supporters to go and vote.

[Tiberius]

Yeah but, somehow I don't think the Libertarians are going to accept public funding from the federal government for an election.

Well part of Gary Johnson's 2012 campaign was trying to get to the magic 5% number so they could secure funding. Here's an article discussing one of their adverts: http://ivn.us/2012/11/01/why-5-matters-to-gary-johnson/

Whilst it goes against Libertarian principles, I would expect the Libertarians would accept the money just so they have a fighting chance in an otherwise unfair race.

[henryp]

I suspect it may jump back up when the debates start; somehow I can't see Trump holding his own against Clinton in a debate.

So my point is, although Trump may have a worse logical coherence in the debates than Clinton, there are still some over-looked factors that can very likely boost his votes even more. 

Foreign policy is going to be an interesting one to see how Hillary navigates.  She hasn't even tried yet.  I'm curious to see how they spin the middle east to make it look like her time as Sec of State bodes well for her being commander in chief.  Not that Trump is any better.  But he isn't on the hook for any actual decisions, so he's just theoretically awful.

Overall though, it's going to be a shit show.  Both are obviously disasters willing to switch positions at any moment, and pander to any crowd if it gets them a few more votes.  With all the inconsistencies, I think it'll just be a lot of finger pointing and hollering.  The winner might be the one who makes less of their own supporters decide to stay home out of disgust.

[dyresand]

Even after all that has happened, Hilary just recently thanked Debbie for all of her work over as head of the DNC in a speech and immediately gives her a job in her campaign for president:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_v_jcyaRTc

Hilary is doing everything she can to make Donald Trump win the election!!!!!!

Like I said before, Hilary is too arrogant for her own good. She's making damn sure Donald keeps his lead over her (currently 1% according to the Real Clear Politics average) in the polls. She will continue to spit at those who vote for Senator Sanders and may only win the election because she rigs it like she had the Democratic primary rigged.

You know i hope she keep's flipping off Bernie voters and talking shit about them the less votes she gets
the more votes third party get.

[thool]

Funny, I recall getting excited about Bernie Sanders early on, but was puzzled why he got no air time. I'm talking when his campaign was just ramping up. Instead, the media focused on the republican freak-show for every waking hour. It almost came across that unopposed Hillary will run against whomever emerged from the republican debates.

It would not surprise me if wikileaks held back until Hillary was locked in, just to focus the anger against her.

Thanks DNC, now you are giving Trump a chance.

[Whateverist]

Might be really interesting if most all folks who would never in a million trillion years vote for Trump nevertheless insist  they would anyhow to the DNC poobahs if those poobahs don't start  fucking cleaning up their shit mill.

Ahh .. the old hold-your-breath-until-you-turn-blue maneuver.  That is soooo hard to defend against.  

[dyresand]

Funny, I recall getting excited about Bernie Sanders early on, but was puzzled why he got no air time. I'm talking when his campaign was just ramping up. Instead, the media focused on the republican freak-show for every waking hour. It almost came across that unopposed Hillary will run against whomever emerged from the republican debates.

It would not surprise me if wikileaks held back until Hillary was locked in, just to focus the anger against her.

Thanks DNC, now you are giving Trump a chance.

Pretty sure that's what they are planning hit the Hillary at every critical moment i mean look at the polls now before and after emails. 
In that position with the email leaking you can't throw it all out there at once you keep hitting the corrupt democratic party where it hurts
with those emails once the final batches are out i mean to put this way she won't be able to say we got to unite the democratic party 
rather she will start saying please.. dont hate me vote for me anyways.

[Seraphina]

What fascinates me about this is that there's evidence that Russian hackers are the source of this email dump. There's also some talk that the same hackers here have hacked into other governments' systems.
I wonder if Putin's minions are satisfied at the uproar they've caused. Perhaps someone should tell them that we Americans have attention spans of gnats and the email scandal won't matter much in a few days except to Faux News.

[Rayaan]

What fascinates me about this is that there's evidence that Russian hackers are the source of this email dump.

And the motivation for the email dump was most likely to help Trump, I believe. Here's why:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2...orm-214074

Naturally enough, a lot of people are saying that Russia should not interfere at all with the election process of a foreign country. But, in an ironic twist, this argument backfires on us because American presidents have also exerted a great deal of time and effort to influence leadership in the Middle East countries, like we saw in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and elsewhere in the region. Let's just not forget that.