Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 3:51 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
#11
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
Sure, I was saying that even if he is right it doesn't make any difference to anything. Of course he is not right.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#12
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?
Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?
Reply
#13
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
TheBorg... what are you on? [emoji13]
Reply
#14
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 10:22 am)LostLocke Wrote:
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?
Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?

He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#15
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 9:07 am)Alex K Wrote: Lol. Relying on Russian internet source that has determined mass loss for dead people. What could possibly go wrong Big Grin

Considering the Holodomor, I'm pretty sure even the Russians would admit that mass loss precedes death.
Reply
#16
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 8:52 am)theBorg Wrote: The energy of Hiroshima atomic explosion is the 0.7 gram. The lost of weight during human death ranges from 2.5 to 22.4 gram (the Russian Internet Resource, and I think, that any natural leak of matter was considered and calculated). So, the really the supernatural thing is happening.


Well, either that or you're just easily confused.
Reply
#17
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 10:26 am)Alex K Wrote:
(August 17, 2016 at 10:22 am)LostLocke Wrote: Yeah. I'm no pyrotechnic, but isn't 0.7 grams not even a firecracker?

He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT
Ah, he means the output, not the "stuff" inside, huh?
On that note, is there a way to figure out about what type of device or 'thing' would yield 0.7 grams?
Reply
#18
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 11:00 am)LostLocke Wrote:
(August 17, 2016 at 10:26 am)Alex K Wrote: He means 0.7 grams mass-energy equivalence via E=mc^2 which is a reasonable number, not .7 grams TNT
Ah, he means the output, not the "stuff" inside, huh?
On that note, is there a way to figure out about what type of device or 'thing' would yield 0.7 grams?

Yes, in Nuclear fusion, something like couple of permille of mass energy is converted to blast energy, for fission it is a bit less. Look up that number for a device and divide .7 grams by it. E.g., if we assume 1 permille conversion just for concreteness, .7g energy output would correspond to an H-Bomb with 700g tritium or lithium or so in it (which sounds like little, so we're maybe not dealing with an fusion bomb... idk).

You could use Wolfram Alpha to directly convert 0.7 grams * c^2 into kilotons TNT...
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#19
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This is either just a product of the english-as-a-second-language barrier, or one of the most obvious Poe's I've seen in a while - especially considering the extremely short post length.

The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?

Just because your worldview is under the test - I am the Poe??? The humankind has come to mass conservation in very clever experiments: mass always conserves in chemical reactions. Why then nobody cares to weight the dying person and his matter-leaks???
Reply
#20
RE: Can you give me scientific references to mass loss during the pass over?
(August 17, 2016 at 1:38 pm)theBorg Wrote:
(August 17, 2016 at 9:01 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: This is either just a product of the english-as-a-second-language barrier, or one of the most obvious Poe's I've seen in a while - especially considering the extremely short post length.

The energy of the atomic explosion is 0.7 grams?

Just because your worldview is under the test - I am the Poe??? The humankind has come to mass conservation in very clever experiments: mass always conserves in chemical reactions. Why then nobody cares to weight the dying person and his matter-leaks???

Because it's made up
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is "Cause and Effect" Scientific? Lord Andreasson 11 615 October 7, 2024 at 6:36 pm
Last Post: Sheldon
  Scientific/objective purpose of human species, may be to replicate universes blue grey brain 6 1274 November 25, 2018 at 10:17 am
Last Post: unfogged
  Not watering plants during the summer day is a myth! Jehanne 21 2957 July 11, 2018 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Human brain activity during stone tool production. The Grand Nudger 6 1711 May 2, 2018 at 9:26 pm
Last Post: Fireball
  Mass extinction date set by science. ignoramus 74 21847 October 29, 2017 at 1:33 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Intelligent Design as a scientific theory? SuperSentient 26 6815 March 26, 2017 at 11:07 pm
Last Post: SuperSentient
  Questioning Scientific Titans ScepticOrganism 19 3683 July 1, 2016 at 11:56 am
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  Scientific Studies IATIA 9 2194 May 11, 2016 at 7:48 pm
Last Post: ignoramus
  The scientific version of good and bad Detective L Ryuzaki 15 5576 August 31, 2015 at 12:39 am
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  Scientific Adam and Eve Won2blv 52 15808 June 22, 2015 at 10:57 am
Last Post: Fidel_Castronaut



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)