Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 26, 2024, 3:48 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The "Cultural Context" Excuse
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
(September 7, 2016 at 4:10 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:
(September 7, 2016 at 11:58 am)Whateverist Wrote: Just going to bump this Huggy because I'd really like to know if you think of the 'supernatural' as something forever unexplainable by natural means or if you think of it as something which so far is with out natural explanation.  My impression is that many theists think of it in the first way, as though God just operates through pure intentional magic for which His will is both the way and the means.  That is what I don't buy.  If there were gods I would assume they are savvy to some know how that escapes us.  Your thoughts?

I'm not ignoring you, I'm just not at home and may not be for a couple of days.

However the short answer to your question is the supernatural is that which defy natural laws.

An example of that would be Jesus walking on water. How will one ever explain that according to the laws of physics?


If you're away from your computer, it'll keep until you're back.  Your example is of an action which flys in the face of what we do know about physics.  Ordinarily, no one of ordinary size is able to walk on water in its liquid state.  So in this example, what counts as supernatural would be an action that goes against natural law.

But what I was really asking was whether supernatural actions were ones which utilized an advanced knowledge of natural law to do what we with our inferior understanding could not do -or- are they ones which represent a action caused by pure, divine intention which uses no mechanism other that God's will.  I guess it isn't reasonable to expect you to know how the Christian creator god does what He does.  However, if it turns out that God is working with an advanced understanding of natural law to pull off his parlor tricks (aka miracles), then I would say 'the supernatural' isn't a needed category.  Also, God could then just be a member of an advanced race of aliens much smarter than ourselves.
Reply
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
(September 7, 2016 at 4:10 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: However the short answer to your question is the supernatural is that which defy natural laws.

An example of that would be Jesus walking on water. How will one ever explain that according to the laws of physics?

With trivial ease.  It didn't happen.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
(September 7, 2016 at 4:17 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(September 7, 2016 at 4:10 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I'm not ignoring you, I'm just not at home and may not be for a couple of days.

However the short answer to your question is the supernatural is that which defy natural laws.

An example of that would be Jesus walking on water. How will one ever explain that according to the laws of physics?

One wouldn't. One would explain it as legend.

Maybe Jebus invented waterskiing. Ever think of that, huh?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli

Home
Reply
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
A team of well trained turtles?

Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk
Reply
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
This tap dance still going? What are we up to now? Water sports?

Oh well, just three more subject changes and we pass Go and collect 50 sheckles.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: The "Cultural Context" Excuse
(August 3, 2016 at 2:39 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: So you admit that an unborn child has no rights and the mother can destroy it if she wants to...

That statement is why you're a hypocrite.

I was stating the legal fact that an unborn child has no legal rights and a mother can abort it if she wants to.

Next you'll be calling fetuses babies.

Stating that an unborn child that has no legal rights has no legal rights =/= hypocrisy unless your definition of a "hypocrite" is "Oh noes! Someone is pointing to a fact that I don't want to acknowledge! Whaaaaaaa! Whaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!"
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "You, atheists take Bible quotes out of context" mcolafson 61 13635 October 4, 2016 at 3:12 pm
Last Post: CapnAwesome
  The ONLY excuse good enough for God? ronedee 99 11482 June 1, 2015 at 10:24 am
Last Post: Chas



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)