new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Why?

*Gestures to the previous 8 pages*

As is observed, the prior posters had but ignored facts.

.
.
.

---

It's another time cube guy.

Whom? Why? 
Encompass your stipulations in scientific data, rather than blather.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Beliefs are quite the likely danger.

That is your, ahem, belief.

Perhaps it is pertinent that you discard that of the entirety of the beliefs of thine.

You're too precious by half, kid.

Albeit, I have but provided 'simplified' sequences, amidst the linked urls.

lol, did you just discover "albeit" yesterday or something?

By extension, I am quite the intellect. [Observe my signature]

Even funnier ...if you've got to tell others that you're smart, it must not be evident.

(Also, I have sigs turned off, and don't reckon you merit the effort of turning them back on.)

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

ProgrammingGodJordan, between a very hot women and good looking robot women, who would you marry?

Sorry for the off topic.

Super-intelligence is likely on the horizon.
Therein, that query is perhaps irrelevant.

[Alex K]

Albeit I'm convinced now.

[Angrboda]

It's another time cube guy.

Whom? Why? 
Encompass your stipulations in scientific data, rather than blather.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Beliefs are quite the likely danger.

That is your, ahem, belief.

Perhaps it is pertinent that you discard that of the entirety of the beliefs of thine.

You're too precious by half, kid.

Albeit, I have but provided 'simplified' sequences, amidst the linked urls.

lol, did you just discover "albeit" yesterday or something?

By extension, I am quite the intellect. [Observe my signature]

Even funnier ...if you've got to tell others that you're smart, it must not be evident.

(Also, I have sigs turned off, and don't reckon you merit the effort of turning them back on.)

(1)

It is quite observable that theists  ignore evidence, on the boundary of belief/faith: 
DATA: http://psr.sagepub.com/content/early/201...6.abstract

Such is observable absent belief.
Pertinently, recall that belief is inexistent (on the boundary of science).


Separately, belief may compound on NON-SCIENCE.
Logic/SCIENCE may not compound on NON-SCIENCE.

.
.
.

(2)

SIGNATURE OF MINE:

Computational configuration p∞, constrains computation potential in oscillating patterns σm, for some non-polynomially computable function u.

A CONTRIVANCE OF MINE, BETWIXT TRIGONOMETRIC INTEGRATION:
http://www.academia.edu/13808654/Trigono...lapser_set

FACEBOOK: 
https://www.facebook.com/ProgrammingGodJordan

FOLIOVERSE: 
http://folioverse.appspot.com/

LABORATORY:
http://mindparadoxlabs.appspot.com/

LATEST SCIENTIFIC WORK:
https://github.com/JordanMicahBennett/God

[FatAndFaithless]

A CONTRIVANCE OF MINE, BETWIXT TRIGONOMETRIC INTEGRATION:

It's like reading pretentious robo-shakespeare.

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

Whom? Why? 
Encompass your stipulations in scientific data, rather than blather.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube

It appears you have but misunderstood the prior stipulation of mine.
Simply, bound your lamentations vis a vis scientific data.

In exemplification, prove scientifically, the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

[purplepurpose]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Cube

It appears you have but misunderstood the prior stipulation of mine.
Simply, bound your lamentations vis a vis scientific data.

In exemplification, describe any non-scientific sequence amidst my initial stipulation.

ProgrammingGodJordan, do you find an absolutely rational worldview, where emotions are suppressed to the max at all time as a way you wish to live your life? Do you enjoy life at all or you see it as a waste of time, which hinders your development?

[ProgrammingGodJordan]

It appears you have but misunderstood the prior stipulation of mine.
Simply, bound your lamentations vis a vis scientific data.

In exemplification, describe any non-scientific sequence amidst my initial stipulation.

ProgrammingGodJordan, do you find an absolutely rational worldview, where emotions are suppressed to the max at all time as a way you wish to live your life? Do you enjoy life at all or you see it as a waste of time, which hinders your development?

(1)

I had edited my prior stipulation, via user 'Jörmungandr'.

PRIOR: In exemplification, describe any non-scientific sequence amidst my initial stipulation.

SUBSEQUENT: In exemplification, prove scientifically, the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

.
.
.

(2)

(a)
It is likely that life's meaning arises amidst thermodynamics: http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/mit-physici...ng-of-life

(b)
SEPARATELY, life perhaps exists, such that matter shall manifest as some disparate time-space complex optimal fabric, on the order of algorithmic analysis: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meanin...-Bennett-9