Login

**Ravenshire** · December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am

(December 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.

And yet, these are statements of belief.

~~ProgrammingGodJordan~~

(December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(December 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.

And yet, these are statements of belief.

What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?

NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.

**Iroscato** · December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am

You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.

It does not.

~~ProgrammingGodJordan~~ · December 31, 2016 at 2:27 am

(December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am)Iroscato Wrote: You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.

It does not.

I have not any beliefs.

Recall:

Belief may constitute non-science.

Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.

Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.

**Alex K** · December 31, 2016 at 3:11 am

(December 31, 2016 at 2:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am)Iroscato Wrote: You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.

It does not.

I have not any beliefs.

Recall:

Belief may constitute non-science.

Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.

Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.

Remember: Vulcanism kills

Pompei/Herculaneum - never forget

**Ravenshire** · December 31, 2016 at 4:34 am

(December 31, 2016 at 1:47 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: And yet, these are statements of belief.

What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?

NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.

Below are statements made by you which are statements of belief:

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.

You believe that you have no beliefs and you believe that beliefs are for idiots and theists. You have no scientific foundation for either of those beliefs. You fail at your own cult. Congratulations!

On another note... Please lose your thesaurus. Long words improperly used do not make you look intelligent. Quite the opposite actually.

~~ProgrammingGodJordan~~

(December 31, 2016 at 4:34 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:
(December 31, 2016 at 1:47 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?

NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.

Below are statements made by you which are statements of belief:

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.

You believe that you have no beliefs and you believe that beliefs are for idiots and theists. You have no scientific foundation for either of those beliefs. You fail at your own cult. Congratulations!

On another note... Please lose your thesaurus. Long words improperly used do not make you look intelligent. Quite the opposite actually.

(1.a)

Incorrect.

Perhaps it is pertinent that you observe:

http://psr.sagepub.com/content/early/201...6.abstract

.
.
.

(1.b)

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as TRUE, especially absent evidence.

There are many slices of time/space.
At any given point, we can only act in a distinct slice of time.
So inherently, we never make any TRUE/TOTAL/ABSOLUTE actions - we don't occupy all slices of time.

[Thusly, we don't believe.]

Herein, any action we take is inherently from a sequence of OPTIMAL PROBABILITIES (where reality naturally contains many optimal ACTION-PROBABILITY mappings), rather than COMPLETE ACTIONS.

(1.c)

ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any beliefs.

Recall:

Belief may constitute non-science.

Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.

Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.

.
.
.

(2)

Perhaps it is pertinent that you demonstrate that of my supposedly erroneous word usage.

.
.
.

(3)

The initial post is layman bound, and separate from my default language cycle: [Sample: http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis]

Thusly, the aforesaid layman sequence has been observed to be rather absorbable.

.
.
.

(4)

Have you not any thought cycles, beyond nonsense?

**Alex K** · (This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 6:28 am by Alex K.)

"The aforesaid adsorbable layman sequence" (TAALS) is my new prog band

**chimp3** · (This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 8:00 am by chimp3.)

I just read Jordans paper here : http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis

No amount of Blue Cheese Dressing could fix this word salad. It reads like a Professor Irwin Corey Lecture. Only not funny.

Now this is funny :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxtN0xxzfsw

~~ProgrammingGodJordan~~

(December 31, 2016 at 7:53 am)chimp3 Wrote: I just read Jordans paper here : http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis

No amount of Blue Cheese Dressing could fix this word salad. It reads like a Professor Irwin Corey Lecture. Only not funny.

Now this is funny :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxtN0xxzfsw

Here is the base code betwixt the aforesaid paper: https://github.com/JordanMicahBennett/God/

.
.
.
.
.
.

(December 31, 2016 at 6:28 am)Alex K Wrote: "The aforesaid adsorbable layman sequence" (TAALS) is my new prog band

What is 'adsorbable'?

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	The Possibly Proper Death Litany, aka ...	Gawdzilla Sama	11	1379	December 18, 2023 at 1:15 pm Last Post: Mister Agenda
	Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance.	Nishant Xavier	55	4967	August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
	British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church.	Nishant Xavier	36	2654	August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS	Rinni92	13	3521	August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm Last Post: Sal
	Arizona State Suspends Lawrence Krauss Over Sexual Misconduct Accusations	Alexmahone	30	11850	March 11, 2018 at 10:25 am Last Post: Jehanne
	More than half of the Uk say they are non-religious	downbeatplumb	9	3115	September 5, 2017 at 5:04 pm Last Post: Anomalocaris
	Atheist "nativity" at California State Capitol	Seraphina	16	2945	December 27, 2016 at 4:10 pm Last Post: TheRealJoeFish
	A non-aggressive religion?	rado84	24	5347	November 28, 2016 at 12:09 am Last Post: Brian37
	Being a sinner just for being born	mlmooney89	110	18608	June 14, 2016 at 12:17 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	A Non-Religious Person's Meaning in Life and Death	AFTT47	17	5487	January 12, 2016 at 12:52 am Last Post: Whateverist