Posts: 8239
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am
(December 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.
And yet, these are statements of belief.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 1:47 am
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 1:50 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: (December 30, 2016 at 11:42 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.
And yet, these are statements of belief.
What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?
NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.
Posts: 4705
Threads: 38
Joined: April 5, 2015
Reputation:
66
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")
December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am
You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.
It does not.
If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 2:27 am
(December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am)Iroscato Wrote: You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.
It does not.
I have not any beliefs.
Recall:
Belief may constitute non-science.
Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.
Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 3:11 am
(December 31, 2016 at 2:27 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (December 31, 2016 at 2:11 am)Iroscato Wrote: You seem to believe this "throw a thesaurus into a blender" approach to communication makes you appear intelligent.
It does not.
I have not any beliefs.
Recall:
Belief may constitute non-science.
Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.
Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.
Remember: Vulcanism kills
Pompei/Herculaneum - never forget
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 8239
Threads: 40
Joined: March 18, 2014
Reputation:
54
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 4:34 am
(December 31, 2016 at 1:47 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: (December 31, 2016 at 12:47 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: And yet, these are statements of belief.
What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?
NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.
Below are statements made by you which are statements of belief:
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.
You believe that you have no beliefs and you believe that beliefs are for idiots and theists. You have no scientific foundation for either of those beliefs. You fail at your own cult. Congratulations!
On another note... Please lose your thesaurus. Long words improperly used do not make you look intelligent. Quite the opposite actually.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 5:06 am
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 5:29 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 31, 2016 at 4:34 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: (December 31, 2016 at 1:47 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: What stipulation of mine appears to be supposedly believed?
What data of mine, do I hold as TRUE/ABSOLUTE, absent SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE?
NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as true, especially absent evidence.
Below are statements made by you which are statements of belief:
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any belief. Such is for idiots/theists.
You believe that you have no beliefs and you believe that beliefs are for idiots and theists. You have no scientific foundation for either of those beliefs. You fail at your own cult. Congratulations!
On another note... Please lose your thesaurus. Long words improperly used do not make you look intelligent. Quite the opposite actually.
(1.a)
Incorrect.
Perhaps it is pertinent that you observe:
http://psr.sagepub.com/content/early/201...6.abstract
.
.
.
(1.b)
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:NOTE: Highly frequent belief definition: To accept as TRUE, especially absent evidence.
There are many slices of time/space.
At any given point, we can only act in a distinct slice of time.
So inherently, we never make any TRUE/TOTAL/ABSOLUTE actions - we don't occupy all slices of time.
[Thusly, we don't believe.]
Herein, any action we take is inherently from a sequence of OPTIMAL PROBABILITIES (where reality naturally contains many optimal ACTION-PROBABILITY mappings), rather than COMPLETE ACTIONS.
(1.c)
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:I have not any beliefs.
Recall:
Belief may constitute non-science.
Logic/science in contrast, shan’t encode non-science.
Thereafter, it is illogical to believe.
.
.
.
(2)
Perhaps it is pertinent that you demonstrate that of my supposedly erroneous word usage.
.
.
.
(3)
The initial post is layman bound, and separate from my default language cycle: [Sample: http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis]
Thusly, the aforesaid layman sequence has been observed to be rather absorbable.
.
.
.
(4)
Have you not any thought cycles, beyond nonsense?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked")
December 31, 2016 at 6:28 am
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 6:28 am by Alex K.)
"The aforesaid adsorbable layman sequence" (TAALS) is my new prog band
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 5664
Threads: 219
Joined: June 20, 2016
Reputation:
61
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
December 31, 2016 at 7:53 am
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2016 at 8:00 am by chimp3.)
I just read Jordans paper here : http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis
No amount of Blue Cheese Dressing could fix this word salad. It reads like a Professor Irwin Corey Lecture. Only not funny.
Now this is funny :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxtN0xxzfsw
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
Posts: 354
Threads: 9
Joined: November 1, 2016
Reputation:
1
RE: new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked&qu...
January 1, 2017 at 12:14 am
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2017 at 12:20 am by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(December 31, 2016 at 7:53 am)chimp3 Wrote: I just read Jordans paper here : http://www.academia.edu/25733790/Causal_...hypothesis
No amount of Blue Cheese Dressing could fix this word salad. It reads like a Professor Irwin Corey Lecture. Only not funny.
Now this is funny :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxtN0xxzfsw
Here is the base code betwixt the aforesaid paper: https://github.com/JordanMicahBennett/God/
.
.
.
.
.
.
(December 31, 2016 at 6:28 am)Alex K Wrote: "The aforesaid adsorbable layman sequence" (TAALS) is my new prog band
What is ' adsorbable'?
|