(March 9, 2017 at 8:11 am)chimp3 Wrote: But the Prez's kids are running his businesses with security paid for by taxpayers.
The businesses don't benefit from the security.
Security for Trumps Son and Daughter
|
(March 9, 2017 at 8:11 am)chimp3 Wrote: But the Prez's kids are running his businesses with security paid for by taxpayers. The businesses don't benefit from the security. (March 9, 2017 at 10:51 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: I think this is wise. Trump is unstable enough as it is - can you imagine what he'd be like if one of his children was killed or kidnapped? Or worse yet, ever had to meet one of the plebs sordida?
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home RE: Security for Trumps Son and Daughter
March 9, 2017 at 12:21 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2017 at 12:21 pm by Alex K.)
I think it's not helping the cause to make up unrealistic or obviously unjust accusations against Trump just to try and make him look bad. He has enough legitimate fuckups, if we're starting to level accusations against him that are based on double standards and ignorance wrt standard procedure, it just makes the cause vulnerable to attack.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Indeed. No fucking need to make up shit, if the current (supposed) target rich environment is not providing sufficient rotten tomatoes to hurl at the Trumpites, maybe they aren't actually doing that badly at all ??
Hmmmmmmm, something to think about, particularly in light of my prior suspicion the fear on the left is not of Trump failing, it is of him succeeding. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
I don't like Trump, but this has absolutely nothing to do with my reasoning behind that. This is a non-issue.
RE: Security for Trumps Son and Daughter
March 9, 2017 at 8:25 pm
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2017 at 8:28 pm by chimp3.)
(March 9, 2017 at 10:11 am)vorlon13 Wrote: Billy Carter, a drunken sot of man, had Secret Service protection while hawking his Billy Beer. What's the fucking difference?Jimmy Carter was not profiting from Billy Beer. (March 9, 2017 at 8:35 am)Alex K Wrote:Yes they can have a job and need security. Trump has not divested himself of his businesses. His kids are given security to conduct business for the Presidents personal profit.(March 9, 2017 at 8:11 am)chimp3 Wrote: The Secret Service provides security for the Prez's family. Rightfully so. But the Prez's kids are running his businesses with security paid for by taxpayers. I think they should reimburse us for this service while conducting private business.
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|