Who Says

[Ravenshire]

Listening to evolutionary scientist and the way they word their statements one is lead to believe that nature has a mind that organizes everything through evolution. My question to them, why does this mind work so slowly. I've watched documentaries on National Geographic Channel that animals made good decisions in changing themselves to adapt to their needs, smart animals to be able to change their DNA by adding information to it. Seen also where plants made decisions to develop certain flowers to attract certain insects to them. Smart plants for something that has no possible way of producing a though, especially one that complex. By the way how did the insects survive untill the plant figured out how to add information to it's DNA to grow a different type of flower, changing DNA doesn't happen over night.

GC

Wow, you either didn't pay attention, couldn't understand what was being presented or are just flat out lying about what you saw.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes evolution follows any kind of purpose.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes plants or animals decide to change their genetic structure.

You are completely fucking ignorant of how evolution works. All your claims that you have studied it are proven as lies. You really should quit commenting on something about which you know nothing.

[Succubus]

You can't blame an unthinking act of nature . You can blame a thinking all powerful being.

So you do believe in God and that He is the creator, are we making progress? Listening to evolutionary scientist and the way they word their statements one is lead to believe that nature has a mind that organizes everything through evolution. My question to them, why does this mind work so slowly. I've watched documentaries on National Geographic Channel that animals made good decisions in changing themselves to adapt to their needs, smart animals to be able to change their DNA by adding information to it. Seen also where plants made decisions to develop certain flowers to attract certain insects to them. Smart plants for something that has no possible way of producing a though, especially one that complex. By the way how did the insects survive untill the plant figured out how to add information to it's DNA to grow a different type of flower, changing DNA doesn't happen over night.

---

Either:
a) You are irredeemably stupid.
b) You are now blatantly trolling this forum.

---

Wow, you either didn't pay attention, couldn't understand what was being presented or are just flat out lying about what you saw.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes evolution follows any kind of purpose.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes plants or animals decide to change their genetic structure.

You are completely fucking ignorant of how evolution works. All your claims that you have studied it are proven as lies. You really should quit commenting on something about which you know nothing.

Two minds with a single thought.

[Godscreated]

Listening to evolutionary scientist and the way they word their statements one is lead to believe that nature has a mind that organizes everything through evolution. My question to them, why does this mind work so slowly. I've watched documentaries on National Geographic Channel that animals made good decisions in changing themselves to adapt to their needs, smart animals to be able to change their DNA by adding information to it. Seen also where plants made decisions to develop certain flowers to attract certain insects to them. Smart plants for something that has no possible way of producing a though, especially one that complex. By the way how did the insects survive untill the plant figured out how to add information to it's DNA to grow a different type of flower, changing DNA doesn't happen over night.

GC

Wow, you either didn't pay attention, couldn't understand what was being presented or are just flat out lying about what you saw.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes evolution follows any kind of purpose.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes plants or animals decide to change their genetic structure.

You are completely fucking ignorant of how evolution works. All your claims that you have studied it are proven as lies. You really should quit commenting on something about which you know nothing.

 I'm not the one saying those things, it's the National Geographic Channel and they do it as a sales pitch. You nor anyone else are fooling the educated Christians and we will continue to meat your lies at every turn. Evolution like the big bang has a serious problem, no one has ever proven how either process could have gotten started. No start no thing, you are buying into a money game and are to blind to see the truth, you blindly accept what you are taught as truth even when you know it has so many flaws that if it were a bucket it couldn't hold water.

GC

[Ravenshire]

Wow, you either didn't pay attention, couldn't understand what was being presented or are just flat out lying about what you saw.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes evolution follows any kind of purpose.

No legitimate evolutionary scientist believes plants or animals decide to change their genetic structure.

You are completely fucking ignorant of how evolution works. All your claims that you have studied it are proven as lies. You really should quit commenting on something about which you know nothing.

 I'm not the one saying those things, it's the National Geographic Channel and they do it as a sales pitch. You nor anyone else are fooling the educated Christians and we will continue to meat your lies at every turn. Evolution like the big bang has a serious problem, no one has ever proven how either process could have gotten started. No start no thing, you are buying into a money game and are to blind to see the truth, you blindly accept what you are taught as truth even when you know it has so many flaws that if it were a bucket it couldn't hold water.

GC

Sorry GC, but your lies and your willful ignorance make you a completely unreliable source. It's painfully obvious you've never so much as cracked a science book, let alone a text on evolution. You can claim they're wrong all you like, but the evidence is in and until you can provide a better explanation (no, gawd isn't an explanation, it's a cop-out) for the evidence, you only continue to look the fool.

You are walking, talking proof that religion is simplification for the hard-at-thinking.

[FatAndFaithless]

Forgive me for being skeptical - I highly doubt Nat Geo characterizes evolution as animals intentionally changing their DNA. Could you provide a link in evidence of that?

[Cyberman]

GC, I am seriously having a problem understanding you. I mean, I recognise individual words, but you seem to be mashing them together in bizarre, unholy and likely illegal ways. Have you ever thought of writing in English?

[Fireball]

GC, I am seriously having a problem understanding you. I mean, I recognise individual words, but you seem to be mashing them together in bizarre, unholy and likely illegal ways. Have you ever thought of writing in English?

That sort of inability to string words together in completely coherent sentences I see a lot of in YECs- who of course deny evolution.

[Whateverist]

 I'm not the one saying those things, it's the National Geographic Channel and they do it as a sales pitch. You nor anyone else are fooling the educated Christians and we will continue to meat your lies at every turn.

Evolution like the big bang has a serious problem, no one has ever proven how either process could have gotten started.

And that is in contrast to the well understood methodology of your god's magic making? Those who believe in sky fairy magic just don't get taken seriously when they challenge the best theories of science.

No start no thing, you are buying into a money game and are to blind to see the truth, you blindly accept what you are taught as truth even when you know it has so many flaws that if it were a bucket it couldn't hold water.

[Succubus]

Forgive me for being skeptical - I highly doubt Nat Geo characterizes evolution as animals intentionally changing their DNA.  Could you provide a link in evidence of that?

More likely he was on his fourth pint of holy water and it was the Flintstones he was watching.

[Ravenshire]

No start no thing

I've got to highlight this. GC seems to believe something cannot exist without a beginning.

How's that gawd thing working for you, GC? From what I understand, from your elucidations, gawd has no beginning. Or, are you going to apply a little special pleading?