The benefits of being christian. Where are there???

[Angrboda]

The only difference is when I speak, when I make a claim it's vetted and backed by source material.

That explains why you were caught speaking improvised and wrongheaded bullshit in the "kid dies" thread. Fucking moron.

[Whateverist]

you were never apart of the conversation you are quoting from.. what are you on about? Do you want my personal attention so you can also be victimized?

---

---

empathy must be a one way street with you people.

"Most of my interactions are unpleasent."

Wonder why that is... oh' that right I am telling you that your views on religion are wrong. in a world where that is the unforgivable sin (socially speaking)

That means you get hot I get hot. but it's not just you is it.. it every single member of the website save maybe 4 or 5 and even then I can piss them off as we all don't see eye to eye.

Yet it is up to me to up hold and maintain a vestige of what a member of YOUR failed religious person should look and act like.

Screw that. I am not like that because we are not all called to act that way. Some of us are call to act and react like you all do, but here what toasts yall bread. AS paul says "when in Rome" The only difference is when I speak, when I make a claim it's vetted and backed by source material. when you do it it is often time off the cuff and based on what you feel, which only severs to further anger you 'good people.' Especially when speaking about pollitics or religion. So again the exchange will be hostile if I am not kissing yalls collective asses. Not my fault you can not act civilly when one voice disagrees with the collective...

Now just imagine there are 75 to 100 active voices against your one voice, how then would you react when someone directly challenges you?

Now because

---

What Jack said.  This is a forum.  I was under the impression that any member can jump in.

And you would be correct. I find Drich is much easier to deal with on mute (Ignore).

[Abaddon_ire]

Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?
Correction?  It's absolutely equal to telling me that everything I know about the Tooth Fairy is wrong and then getting all bent out of shape when I say that the story I was told was that she wears a tiara and carries a wand.  God is fiction.  
I didn't acknowledge god. I merely tested your claim to be able to ask god direct questions and receive answers from him/her/it/housecat. You failed miserably. As did your "god".   I have most of the Bible memorized, I was raised Pentecostal.  I quote the book because it's the "authority" for most xtians.  But the Bible means nothing and proves nothing.  It's an ancient compilation of bronze age fables.  If you claim to get direct messages from God, the only "proof" that most atheists will accept will come from scientific testing, or actual video and audio (preferably multiple examples) that is corroborated by impartial witnesses.  No old fables, no personal fantasies, no cobbled-together fanciful stories or unconfirmed "miracles" - actual proof.  Which no theist who has ever logged in to this site or any other has provided to date.

you were never apart of the conversation you are quoting from.. what are you on about? Do you want my personal attention so you can also be victimized?

So have you asked your god yet what it might be that would convince me that he/she/it/housecat exists yet? Or are you sticking to your previous failure?
And is it your habit to victimise anyone who comes to your attention? How very christian of you.

[Drich]

Now just imagine there are 75 to 100 active voices against your one voice, how then would you react when someone directly challenges you?

That's usually a sign that I'm in the wrong community for my ideas or for my posting style, quietly back away without any drama, and go in search of a better place to express my views.

(IOW, I don't even bother signing up for Christian forums because I know they're a bad fit for me, as well as a waste of my time.)

Ad populum is the logical fallacy that says the mass/majority holds the right answer.

Just because one is in the minority (the world is not flat) does not mean they are automatically wrong.

---

That's usually a sign that I'm in the wrong community for my ideas or for my posting style, quietly back away without any drama, and go in search of a better place to express my views.

(IOW, I don't even bother signing up for Christian forums because I know they're a bad fit for me, as well as a waste of my time.)

That's because you have self-awareness.

Or that is because she is driven by fallacious reasoning.

---

I've read the Bible, maybe what you should do is read it again with a more humble heart (I can teach you!).

then how is it you missed the attitudes Jesus had against his disciples mistakes and the willful disobedience the Jewish leadership held? why then try and hold me to a standard of Christ that does not exist outside of religious institutions?

Also, you ain't Jesus (God) to act all high and mighty, ok?

Are we not called to walk in The Foot steps of Christ? Woe to you hypocrite and pretender sider of the law You call me to walk in the foot steps of Christ, but when I point out I was doing just that you call me out exclaiming I had no right to walk/act as God did!

And you accuse me of being proud, lol. Get back down to earth and humble yourself and remember you're supposed to be just a sheep, not a false prophet that Jesus warned about.

I rightfully identified you as such because you take on a role of a teacher, but when confronted with bd teaching you switch position to try and retain your false authority.

In other words I as a teacher showed you where you were scriptural misrepresenting the bible, then you like a troll try and do the same.

[Abaddon_ire]

Ad populum is the logical fallacy that says the mass/majority holds the right answer.

Like christianity.

Just because one is in the minority (the world is not flat) does not mean they are automatically wrong.

Irrelevant. The rise of islam means that christianity will be a minority. The rise of atheism will also mean that christianity is a minority. Will you convert? Nope.

That's because you have self-awareness.

Or that is because she is driven by fallacious reasoning.

Course it is. Drich and his deity of choice failed a simple test. Since that, Drich has been ducking and diving.

[Drich]

you were never apart of the conversation you are quoting from.. what are you on about? Do you want my personal attention so you can also be victimized?

---

---

empathy must be a one way street with you people.

"Most of my interactions are unpleasent."

Wonder why that is... oh' that right I am telling you that your views on religion are wrong. in a world where that is the unforgivable sin (socially speaking)

That means you get hot I get hot. but it's not just you is it.. it every single member of the website save maybe 4 or 5 and even then I can piss them off as we all don't see eye to eye.

Yet it is up to me to up hold and maintain a vestige of what a member of YOUR failed religious person should look and act like.

Screw that. I am not like that because we are not all called to act that way. Some of us are call to act and react like you all do, but here what toasts yall bread. AS paul says "when in Rome" The only difference is when I speak, when I make a claim it's vetted and backed by source material. when you do it it is often time off the cuff and based on what you feel, which only severs to further anger you 'good people.' Especially when speaking about pollitics or religion. So again the exchange will be hostile if I am not kissing yalls collective asses. Not my fault you can not act civilly when one voice disagrees with the collective...

Now just imagine there are 75 to 100 active voices against your one voice, how then would you react when someone directly challenges you?

Now because

---

What Jack said.  This is a forum.  I was under the impression that any member can jump in.
I do find your offensive tactics, illiterate posts, sociopathic ego, judgmental hateful fantasies, and profound pride in your willful ignorance repulsive.  
Of course, you're the BEST example here for why a person would never want to be a xtian, so you're a great data source.  Keep it up.
But every once in a while I see something monumentally DripShitFull in a quote and respond.  So exactly what sort of victimization are you threatening me with, DripShit? 
What is an illiterate asshole going to use to threaten someone with two Master's Degrees and a Doctorate?  Your psychotic visions, made up stories (lies), and book of fairy tales?
Your assertion that your imaginary friend talks to you?  Tell you what, you pray your little itty bitty hateful heart out, and when your gawd proves that it isn't a fantasy, 
we'll get back to that.

Oh, and the quote "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is from St. Ambrose.  Not Paul.

But how stupid are you (or anyone else in an "OPEN FORUM" to jump in and take what was said about a specific person time and place and apply it to your life?

Don't you understand when I say I comment was not addressed to you, means my comment wasn't an attempt to describe a universal condition, but to speak on an indivisual's situation?

Is it wrong then to point that out?

or are you foolishing saying I should argue the affirmative position concerning my comments on another person, to apply an indivisual that was not the intended target?


Example: Trich likes brownies

Dr. Fuzz: How can you say I like brownies you don't know me.

Again wtf am I supposed to say other than I am not speaking about you moron!

Or because it is an open forum am I supposed to take what I said about one member and argue the fact that I know everyone enough to know where you specifically like brownies!


The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

[Crossless2.0]

The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

In fairness, no one here to my knowledge has ever argued the oppsite.

[Drich]

The only difference is when I speak, when I make a claim it's vetted and backed by source material.

That explains why you were caught speaking improvised and wrongheaded bullshit in the "kid dies" thread.  Fucking moron.

I can't help if your mind is so tightly closed you can not contemplate a point deeper than what you see on the surface.

---

Ad populum is the logical fallacy that says the mass/majority holds the right answer.

Like christianity.

like whatever. the point is this person is using logical fallacy to determine truth.

Just because one is in the minority (the world is not flat) does not mean they are automatically wrong.

Irrelevant. The rise of islam means that christianity will be a minority. The rise of atheism will also mean that christianity is a minority. Will you convert? Nope.

Google top religions of the world sport Christianity almost has it 2:1 over islam. Even so Even the bible says Christian at the end will be in the minority. all but a "reminate" shall be taken/go Home.

Or that is because she is driven by fallacious reasoning.

Course it is. Drich and his deity of choice failed a simple test. Since that, Drich has been ducking and diving.
[/quote]
Please explain How did God fail?

[Abaddon_ire]

But how stupid are you (or anyone else in an "OPEN FORUM" to jump in and take what was said about a specific person time and place and apply it to your life?

Less stupid than you apparently. That is exactly what you do and what atheists reject. You jump in and take what was said about jebus, apply it to your life and think you are clever for some reason.

Don't you understand when I say I comment was not addressed to you, means my comment wasn't an attempt to describe a universal condition, but to speak on an indivisual's situation?

It is an open forum and an open thread. Anyone is free to comment. It seems odd to me that the god-botherers seek to isolate people who challenge their cherished beliefs. It is plainly a "divide and conquer" tactic and it always fails. That tactic has a centuries old track record of failure. It amuses me that theists have nothing to add to human knowledge, and do not even realise it.

Is it wrong then to point that out?

Maybe. What is your god's position on abject lies? And you have your answer.

or are you foolishing saying I should argue the affirmative position concerning my comments on another person, to apply an indivisual that was not the intended target?

Revealing. You claim to target individuals. (Note correct spelling) This reveals more about you and your crank faith than you thought. You are full of hate.

Example: Trich likes brownies

Dr. Fuzz: How can you say I like brownies you don't know me.

Again wtf am I supposed to say other than I am not speaking about you moron!

Or because it is an open forum am I supposed to take what I said about one member and argue the fact that I know everyone enough to know where you specifically like brownies!


The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

Nope. You clearly have no problem with slaughtering all who disagree with your particularly borked version of religion. Good luck with that. The top three growing religious positions have a number one and that is atheism. Yeah, you heard me. You didn't wanna, but that is the reality. Christianity is dying on it's feet.

[drfuzzy]

What Jack said.  This is a forum.  I was under the impression that any member can jump in.
I do find your offensive tactics, illiterate posts, sociopathic ego, judgmental hateful fantasies, and profound pride in your willful ignorance repulsive.  
Of course, you're the BEST example here for why a person would never want to be a xtian, so you're a great data source.  Keep it up.
But every once in a while I see something monumentally DripShitFull in a quote and respond.  So exactly what sort of victimization are you threatening me with, DripShit? 
What is an illiterate asshole going to use to threaten someone with two Master's Degrees and a Doctorate?  Your psychotic visions, made up stories (lies), and book of fairy tales?
Your assertion that your imaginary friend talks to you?  Tell you what, you pray your little itty bitty hateful heart out, and when your gawd proves that it isn't a fantasy, 
we'll get back to that.

Oh, and the quote "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is from St. Ambrose.  Not Paul.

But how stupid are you (or anyone else in an "OPEN FORUM" to jump in and take what was said about a specific person time and place and apply it to your life?

Don't you understand when I say I comment was not addressed to you, means my comment wasn't an attempt to describe a universal condition, but to speak on an indivisual's situation?

Is it wrong then to point that out?

or are you foolishing saying I should argue the affirmative position concerning my comments on another person, to apply an indivisual that was not the intended target?


Example: Trich likes brownies

Dr. Fuzz: How can you say I like brownies you don't know me.

Again wtf am I supposed to say other than I am not speaking about you moron!

Or because it is an open forum am I supposed to take what I said about one member and argue the fact that I know everyone enough to know where you specifically like brownies!


The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

That's an interesting derailment.  Grandizer and Abaddon didn't yell at me for taking a few statements out of your "private" little argument.  You yell when we make general "us" atheist statements, you pitch a tantrum when I make a personal observation.  

So, you were "in discourse" with Grandizer, trying to slime him by claiming that he wasn't much of a bible reader.  (snort) You ended with "Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?"

This is a blanket statement that applies to every atheist, and could reasonably be answered by anyone on this forum.  The statement also shows your typical ignorant arrogance.  

Abaddon wrote something that people here have told you hundreds of times.  "I didn't acknowledge god. I merely tested your claim to be able to ask god direct questions and receive answers from him/her/it/housecat. You failed miserably. As did your "god"."  This is something so common here that it's amazing that you clearly were incapable of comprehending it.  
Abaddon asked for proof, you were incapable, as usual, of providing proof.  Your response was typical gibberish claiming victory because you seem to think that we should believe your fantasies.  Quoting Abaddon was simply providing support of his position.

All you do is hurl childish playground insults and insult people's intelligence when they disagree with something you posted.  You claim to have proof, you constantly provide none.  You told Jor that all of your claims come from vetted sources, and you never provide a single one. I supported the positions of fellow forum members and you throw a tantrum worthy of a 6-year old about . . . brownies?? . . . using 6-year-old logic, grammar, and spelling. 

We ask for proof that your imaginary friend exists, and we get the typical infantile temper tantrum.  Boo-hoo.  Go run home to mommy.