The benefits of being christian. Where are there???

[drfuzzy]

This sounds like it could make for a decent joke thread.  Ask Haipule anything (well almost) and GOD will tell him the answer!  If that actually worked, it could come in handy on tests.  But oh wait - God would want you to study.  Ooh, lottery tickets!  But God probably doesn't approve of gambling, so casinos are probably out too.  (Yo SkyDaddy, tell me what cards he's holding - thanks dude.)  Hmm. Here, I'll throw you a simple one:  I have a classical guitar.  Where was it made?  (On Earth is not an accepted answer.  Neither is "in a luthier's shop" or any of it's equivalents.  You need to at least get on the correct continent.)  Chance of a correct guess:  1 out of 6.

Of course, if someone could do this for real, it would make news.      That would be fun.

What makes you think that God is opposed to gambling? I LOVE blackjack and I am scary good! God need not tell me what the next card is.

As far as the lottery, gambling is illegal here in Hawaii and there is no lottery. However, the authorities turn a blind eye to chicken fights which is cultural and I am NOT invited.

(true story)When I lived in Florida, I put God to the test. He would not give me future lotto numbers but, scratch off lottery tickets are historical. So we picked a location and reel to follow. I told Him I wanted at least a $20.00 winner. Everyday I would ask Him how many tickets I needed to buy to win. It got closer and closer until it was time to act. I went to that location and asked how many tickets to buy: He said 12. I bought those twelve. The first one was the $20.00 winner! The 12th one was a $15.00 winner and I had $6.00 in between! Total: $41.00. Profit: $29.00.

I cashed them in and did not play again. Why? Because it was a pain in the ass and was not worth it! Yet, a nice confirmation.

Your guitar question is a good one. We have it pinned down to Europe. I enquired further, it was made in Portugal by Carvalho. Nice guitar dude!

You're an interesting guy.  It was made in Asuncion, Paraguay.  I love blackjack too.

[Haipule]

What makes you think that God is opposed to gambling? I LOVE blackjack and I am scary good! God need not tell me what the next card is.

As far as the lottery, gambling is illegal here in Hawaii and there is no lottery. However, the authorities turn a blind eye to chicken fights which is cultural and I am NOT invited.

(true story)When I lived in Florida, I put God to the test. He would not give me future lotto numbers but, scratch off lottery tickets are historical. So we picked a location and reel to follow. I told Him I wanted at least a $20.00 winner. Everyday I would ask Him how many tickets I needed to buy to win. It got closer and closer until it was time to act. I went to that location and asked how many tickets to buy: He said 12. I bought those twelve. The first one was the $20.00 winner! The 12th one was a $15.00 winner and I had $6.00 in between! Total: $41.00. Profit: $29.00.

I cashed them in and did not play again. Why? Because it was a pain in the ass and was not worth it! Yet, a nice confirmation.

Your guitar question is a good one. We have it pinned down to Europe. I enquired further, it was made in Portugal by Carvalho. Nice guitar dude!

You're an interesting guy.  It was made in Asuncion, Paraguay.  I love blackjack too.

Oh well, I tried! The answer then is FOOL!

They legalized blackjack in Florida but, $15.00 minimum and charged top dollar for drinks. I can't overcome that vig!

I have recently mostly played on cruise ships on $5.00 tables with six deck revolving shoes paying 6 to 5. Talk about a challenge! Regardless, I have done very well! Certainly, no big wins like Vegas or, Foxwoods.

I'll tell you a funny story. In my mid-twenties, in So Cal, we would party all night and then drive to Vegas. At the time, I used to get very drunk and practice card counting at home so I could do it in Vegas, hopefully, with out getting caught.

So, we're in Vegas and a friend(to me a shill who did not know I could count cards) wanted to play blackjack so we went to a multi-deck $3.00 game downtown buying in for $40.00. I was already drunk--perfect! I kept ordering drinks!

I was up $400.00 when they made an odd change of dealers. She was a large, tattooed biker chick! She dealt the cards nicely: except to me! She Frisbee-ed them as hard as she could! I had to duck to not get paper cuts and chase the cards across the room!

Time to go

I now realize when counting cards--DON'T be greedy.

[Angrboda]

That explains why you were caught speaking improvised and wrongheaded bullshit in the "kid dies" thread.  Fucking moron.

I can't help if your mind is so tightly closed you can not contemplate a point deeper than what you see on the surface.

Oh, you poor misunderstood baby! Everyone who disagrees with you is just too closed minded to see! What a cruel and unfair world we live in!

[Astreja]

That's usually a sign that I'm in the wrong community for my ideas or for my posting style, quietly back away without any drama, and go in search of a better place to express my views.

(IOW, I don't even bother signing up for Christian forums because I know they're a bad fit for me, as well as a waste of my time.)

Ad populum is the logical fallacy that says the mass/majority holds the right answer.

Just because one is in the minority (the world is not flat) does not mean they are automatically wrong.

Epic contextual fail, Drich.  Who's right and who's wrong is irrelevant in this situation.  I clearly said that I find Christian forums to be a waste of time and that I would not fit in with the forum culture (not to mention getting banned for Posting While Atheist in the vast majority of cases).

Frankly, I'd rather spend that time practising scales and arpeggios on various musical instruments because it's more pleasant than trying to convince Christians of my POV *and* improves real-life skills.

[Drich]

But how stupid are you (or anyone else in an "OPEN FORUM" to jump in and take what was said about a specific person time and place and apply it to your life?

Less stupid than you apparently. That is exactly what you do and what atheists reject. You jump in and take what was said about jebus, apply it to your life and think you are clever for some reason.

How cute... you totally miss the point, yet retain your righteous indignation. How is that even possible? ah right foolish pride, in the sense you don't question yourself that you know what I am speaking of you just assume that you are and bulldoze the point your here to make no matter what else is said.

Way to show an open mind mr Representative of "logic and science."

Don't you understand when I say I comment was not addressed to you, means my comment wasn't an attempt to describe a universal condition, but to speak on an indivisual's situation?

It is an open forum and an open thread. Anyone is free to comment.

Hey retard... if my comments were not directed at you meaning I was not describing you then then why assume that I am? why not allow me to describe you or your failures personally? why not allow me to create a personal profile of your specific failings rather than you make like what I said about someone else was directed at you?

For instance you said I failed to accurately represent what it would take for you to believe again. However you will not speak to where or what the failure was. If you want a person discussion then I need some personal inof to discuss... don't jump on someone else's personal info and decide it is your own.

It seems odd to me that the god-botherers seek to isolate people who challenge their cherished beliefs.

If this where even close to being true, what are the 6 god brothers doing on this website where we are the one's who have been isolated? You are projecting a common play from the atheist book. that is why you all have the same old questions and the same old approach. You make people choose between a fantasy God you straw man together, you show supposed contradictions and you compaer that yo a flawless modern life... then shame anyone who does not go along.

It is plainly a "divide and conquer" tactic and it always fails. That tactic has a centuries old track record of failure. It amuses me that theists have nothing to add to human knowledge, and do not even realise it.

that's not true. may who goto collage are divided from God and conquered.

Is it wrong then to point that out?

Maybe. What is your god's position on abject lies? And you have your answer.

What abject lies?

or are you foolishing saying I should argue the affirmative position concerning my comments on another person, to apply an indivisual that was not the intended target?

Revealing. You claim to target individuals. (Note correct spelling) This reveals more about you and your crank faith than you thought. You are full of hate.

Red herring. answer the question. or do you not FINALLY understand what I mean when I said I wasn't speaking to you.. Your failure was in basic comperhension meaning you thought when I said I was not speak to you, you thought I was trying to isolate someone from the pack and hammer them. NOW you understand when I said I was not speak to you it meant I was not speaking about your specifics rather another subjects specifics.
That's friggen aswsome! And now you want to red herring you way of the subject trying to put me on my heels because I used the word target. Meh, so what. At least I can comprehend when someone is speaking about me or my specifics and when they are speaking about someone else all together.. Perhaps if you TARGETTED an individual when speaking meaning using their specifics to address or to make a counter point you would not get so confused playing to the whole perceived "crowd."

Example: Trich likes brownies

Dr. Fuzz: How can you say I like brownies you don't know me.

Again wtf am I supposed to say other than I am not speaking about you moron!

Or because it is an open forum am I supposed to take what I said about one member and argue the fact that I know everyone enough to know where you specifically like brownies!


The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

Nope. You clearly have no problem with slaughtering all who disagree with your particularly borked version of religion.

again moron you speak n generalities when I am speaking of an individual failure. Granted this may not be your failure, but it did belong to DrFuzz.

Good luck with that. The top three growing religious positions have a number one and that is atheism. Yeah, you heard me. You didn't wanna, but that is the reality. Christianity is dying on it's feet.

What are you 225 years in the past? Because that is what Voltaire said about Christianity on his death bed (Within 100 years christianity would completely be dead.) with in 25 years the bible soceity bought his house and used it to print bibles.

He like you was a dreamer.

Maybe google before you speak:
Religion Adherents Percentage
Christianity 2.4 billion 33.51%
Islam 1.6 billion 22.32%
Hinduism 1.15 billion 16.06%
Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist ≤1.1 billion 15.35%

You douche bags can't even beat out a 'regional' religion like hinduism, and it take 4 different classifications of anti goders to get the numbers you do have. You are far from a majority of anything.

[Nay_Sayer]

What are you 225 years in the past? Because that is what Voltaire said about Christianity on his death bed (Within 100 years christianity would completely be dead.) with in 25 years the bible soceity bought his house and used it to print bibles.

He like you was a dreamer.

Maybe google before you speak:
Religion Adherents Percentage
Christianity 2.4 billion 33.51%
Islam 1.6 billion 22.32%
Hinduism 1.15 billion 16.06%
Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist ≤1.1 billion 15.35%

You douche bags can't even beat out a 'regional' religion like hinduism, and it take 4 different classifications of anti goders to get the numbers you do have. You are far from a majority of anything.

So what all that boiled down to is, I'm part of a larger group then you, Ergo I'm right.

Man are you going to boil for a while.  Yikes.

RAmen

[Drich]

That's an interesting derailment.  Grandizer and Abaddon didn't yell at me for taking a few statements out of your "private" little argument.  You yell when we make general "us" atheist statements, you pitch a tantrum when I make a personal observation. 

No I 'yell' becase they took something that was said about a specific person and applied it to themselves and expected me to account for the false accusation. when again what I said was about grandmuff i believe and mermaid applied it to her or the rest of you.. I would have never made the observation that I did to them. what is so hard to understand about that?

If i said I hate your new hair do, then why would i be expected to defend what I said about your hair ifno other person speaking did not have new hair do?

So, you were "in discourse" with Grandizer, trying to slime him by claiming that he wasn't much of a bible reader.  (snort)

wrong. Grandmuff told me I needed to be more Christ like and that I should read my bible to take ques from Christ. (snort) that i was not being a 'good' christian.

Anyway I then said if you think Christ was a pious never upset never insulting never outraged person, then you must not be much of a bible reader. then I proceeded to give example after example biblical instances where Christ slams his opponents and even his disciples when they will not take instruction or they do not learn from mistakes. then I showed some examples of my work that mirrored Christ's work.

You ended with "Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?"
[It blows me away what you people cherry pick to make yourselves the good guys all the time]

Let's see what I actually said thatleads up to this and isolates the rest of you b-holes from the person I was speaking with:

That is the Jesus of the bible. but you don't know of this jesus do you. nuupe you only know of the modern religious holier than thou bs. a standard not even the recorded Christ Himself could ever reach, as his righteous indignation would not allow willful simpltons to cast their shadows upon the truth of God.

It's one thing if you truthfully do not know and ask a question. it is another completely if you do not care and seek to disrupt or just blindly push your version of God on to people.

Don't get me wrong Christ indeed taught with the carrot (with those who knew no better) but for those who pretend to or sought to test or correct Christ he taught using the stick the whole way through.

Again, that is what god his killed. He embarrassed the jewish leadership sooo much they fear rebellion of the people as it seemed Christ knew God far and away better than any of them did, and they were the standing authority.

Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?

post 138
IN CONTEXT something you worked so hard to dishonestly hide, my final comment refers to the reason Jesus was beaten and nailed to a cross. Now if Holy Christ was beaten and crucified in his holy work, the question is how esles would you or anyone else like you react to me teaching the same message? will you see it as warm and inviting or will you view it with hate and anger? again how well was Christ's message received?

This is a blanket statement that applies to every atheist, and could reasonably be answered by anyone on this forum. 

but that is not the statement in question is it? Mermaid asked me if I understood the term Atheist meant based off of what grand muff and I was discussing. That was the "I not speaking to you moment" not the one you chose.

The statement also shows your typical ignorant arrogance. 

What a lying POS you are... good glob, look at all you had to modify just to make me look this way. look at your cherry picking look what you cut and pasted together, what was edited out of my message just so you could say I am the arrogant one. what a disgusting human being you must be to openly take a publicly view document chop it up and spin it so you could be the good guy. when a simple reading from top to bottom changes everything.

Abaddon wrote something that people here have told you hundreds of times.  "I didn't acknowledge god. I merely tested your claim to be able to ask god direct questions and receive answers from him/her/it/housecat. You failed miserably. As did your "god"."  This is something so common here that it's amazing that you clearly were incapable of comprehending it.  

READ THE PARABLE MORON! "My Claim" is contained within the boundaries the parable and subsequent explanation of it! No where in the parable is the provision made you do not have to believe in God! SEEKING IS all about Acknoweledging God and trying to find Him. How can one seek if they refuse to acknoweledge what they are looking for? Which makes that whole dishonest mess a non attempt of the "luke 11 message"  

Abaddon asked for proof, you were incapable, as usual, of providing proof. 

I can only show you where to go to find it. "proof" is in the doing and ultimatly between you and God. Not you and me as I am not God.

Your response was typical gibberish claiming victory because you seem to think that we should believe your fantasies. 

I am not Here for you subsequently YOU don't have to believe anything. I am here for those truly looking for answers. You seek assurance from your peer that you are on the collective path. you have never activly participated in anything that does not reaffirm your close minded world view. so again you and people like you.. I expect nothing from. that reason I answer you is because others who I am here for have the very same questions and they may never ask them

Quoting Abaddon was simply providing support of his position.

All you do is hurl childish playground insults and insult people's intelligence when they disagree with something you posted. 

Truly take the time and read the anger that comes out of your collective mouths ask yourself how would anyone of you react when everything you say is met with anger and venom? where my intellegence is question, on everything from spelling and grammer to my deeply held religious beliefs. by not one or two of you but by everyone! how many 60 page hate threads were dedicated to your expulsion behind your back? when you are in so much contempt all of the time you either give as good as you get or you drown in the poop other throw.

I have always put the same effort into my responses you all put into your posts. meaning if you don't like being insulted 5 times, your intellegence questioned 4 times and your momma spoken of, then i suggest you do not insult me 5 time call me stupid 4 times and speak bad about y mother.

I unlike you guys am not like this. this anger is counter my nature. I have to seriously think about what to say to meet the quotas you all set for me in the insult catagory.

It's play ground rules here, if you can not respect me for who I am you will respect me because I can swing and hit as hard or if not just a little harder than you do.

I am usally very funny (btw most of you take for ignorance or gibberish) and unload you bile and anger on a tom hanks quote or something obi wan said.

You claim to have proof, you constantly provide none. 

And I do. for me. God will do the same for you if you do as I did. Not a church thing, not a confession thing not a change your anything thing. It is a between you and God and no one else has to know thing. All He asks is if you follow completely what was said in luke 11

You told Jor that all of your claims come from vetted sources, and you never provide a single one.

nupe I told that to Grand muff, and she cut in to that conversation.
I said my FACTS meaning what I have to say about God is vetted was what the orginal conversation was about.

I supported the positions of fellow forum members and you throw a tantrum worthy of a 6-year old about . . . brownies?? . . . using 6-year-old logic, grammar, and spelling. 

and you wonder why I then subsequently dissect your posts scowering them for real lapses in intelligence like fallacious logic, closed minded reasoning,dishonest representation of previous quotes and or the fact checking I do. Why? because spelling and grammar are the faults of a small child, something to grow out of.. however intellectual dishonesty, defaulting arguments to fallacious logic, habitually misrepresenting verifiable facts... those are serious/critical flaws in one's base intellect. you can't just grow out of them, as they are greater indicators of a systemic failure to process information on one's own behalf...

We ask for proof that your imaginary friend exists, and we get the typical infantile temper tantrum.  Boo-hoo.  Go run home to mommy. 

ASK HIM MORON!
That is the only way it works! As God rather see you to Hell proper, than bend himself into the circus clown (Doing tricks on demand) most of you would have Him be so you feel comfortable enough to worship! Especially in light of all that He has already done!

[/quote]

---

What are you 225 years in the past? Because that is what Voltaire said about Christianity on his death bed (Within 100 years christianity would completely be dead.) with in 25 years the bible soceity bought his house and used it to print bibles.

He like you was a dreamer.

Maybe google before you speak:
Religion Adherents Percentage
Christianity 2.4 billion 33.51%
Islam 1.6 billion 22.32%
Hinduism 1.15 billion 16.06%
Secular/Nonreligious/Agnostic/Atheist ≤1.1 billion 15.35%

You douche bags can't even beat out a 'regional' religion like hinduism, and it take 4 different classifications of anti goders to get the numbers you do have. You are far from a majority of anything.

So what all that boiled down to is, I'm part of a larger group then you, Ergo I'm right.

Man are you going to boil for a while.  Yikes.

RAmen

straw man arguement, not only does this not apply to the reason those numbers were posted, and two I actuall belong to the largest group. meaning if we were using your straw man logic I would still be right as I belong to the largest group, not you.

Naengmyeon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naengmyeon

[Abaddon_ire]

You claimed that your god not only listened to your questions but provided direct answers.

I challenged you to ask your god a direct question and give us all the answer your god provide.

Both you and your god failed miserably.

Care to go for your THIRD strike?

You will fail again, of course.

[drfuzzy]

That's an interesting derailment.  Grandizer and Abaddon didn't yell at me for taking a few statements out of your "private" little argument.  You yell when we make general "us" atheist statements, you pitch a tantrum when I make a personal observation. 

Drich No I 'yell' becase they took something that was said about a specific person and applied it to themselves and expected me to account for the false accusation. when again what I said was about grandmuff i believe and mermaid applied it to her or the rest of you.. I would have never made the observation that I did to them. what is so hard to understand about that?

If i said I hate your new hair do, then why would i be expected to defend what I said about your hair ifno other person speaking did not have new hair do?

Fuzz  See your original claim in bold green below.  It is in no way "personal".  No matter what this yammering whiny temper tantrum implies.

So, you were "in discourse" with Grandizer, trying to slime him by claiming that he wasn't much of a bible reader.  (snort)

Drich  wrong. Grandmuff told me I needed to be more Christ like and that I should read my bible to take ques from Christ. (snort) that i was not being a 'good' christian.
Fuzz  - People do imply that "Christ-Like" means respectful, calm, loving, and gentle.  Yes, Christ is reported as calling Pharisees and Sadducees all sorts of names. He apparently had a problem with people following laws and not caring about people.  Stuff like that.
Drich   Anyway I then said if you think Christ was a pious never upset never insulting never outraged person, then you must not be much of a bible reader. then I proceeded to give example after example biblical instances where Christ slams his opponents and even his disciples when they will not take instruction or they do not learn from mistakes. then I showed some examples of my work that mirrored Christ's work.   Fuzz - LOL  

You ended with "Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?"
[It blows me away what you people cherry pick to make yourselves the good guys all the time]

Let's see what I actually said thatleads up to this and isolates the rest of you b-holes from the person I was speaking with:

That is the Jesus of the bible. but you don't know of this jesus do you. nuupe you only know of the modern religious holier than thou bs. a standard not even the recorded Christ Himself could ever reach, as his righteous indignation would not allow willful simpltons to cast their shadows upon the truth of God.

It's one thing if you truthfully do not know and ask a question. it is another completely if you do not care and seek to disrupt or just blindly push your version of God on to people.

Don't get me wrong Christ indeed taught with the carrot (with those who knew no better) but for those who pretend to or sought to test or correct Christ he taught using the stick the whole way through.

Again, that is what god his killed. He embarrassed the jewish leadership sooo much they fear rebellion of the people as it seemed Christ knew God far and away better than any of them did, and they were the standing authority.  

Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?

post 138
IN CONTEXT something you worked so hard to dishonestly hide, my final comment refers to the reason Jesus was beaten and nailed to a cross. Now if Holy Christ was beaten and crucified in his holy work, the question is how esles would you or anyone else like you react to me teaching the same message? will you see it as warm and inviting or will you view it with hate and anger? again how well was Christ's message received?
Fuzz - I did not DISHONESTLY HIDE your rambling, illogical, mispelled, poorly constructed rant.  It's still there.  I was just being considerate for the others in the forum by hiding a wall of text that was irrelevant to my comment.  When I leave an offensive wall of text up like this, it's harder to read.  Particularly when the grammar and spelling and illogic demonstrated forces people to read a sentence three times before it can be translated into English.

Fuzz  This is a blanket statement that applies to every atheist, and could reasonably be answered by anyone on this forum. 

Drich  but that is not the statement in question is it? Mermaid asked me if I understood the term Atheist meant based off of what grand muff and I was discussing. That was the "I not speaking to you moment" not the one you chose.   "Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?"   Fuzz - My response was correct.  "This is a blanket statement that applies to every atheist, and could reasonably be answered by anyone on this forum."

Fuzz The statement also shows your typical ignorant arrogance. 

Drich  What a lying POS you are... good glob, look at all you had to modify just to make me look this way. look at your cherry picking look what you cut and pasted together, what was edited out of my message just so you could say I am the arrogant one. what a disgusting human being you must be to openly take a publicly view document chop it up and spin it so you could be the good guy. when a simple reading from top to bottom changes everything.  Fuzz - See the bold paragraph above, IF you can actually read.  And I did not cut and paste anything, I just hid it.  I'm not making you look any sort of way.  If posts were well-crafted, logical, and intelligent, that's how we perceive the poster.  If they are poorly constructed, rambling, egotistical, disrespectful, and insulting, that's how we perceive the poster.  From your posts here, I'm quite certain that I would never want to be in the same city with you.  

Fuzz  Abaddon wrote something that people here have told you hundreds of times.  "I didn't acknowledge god. I merely tested your claim to be able to ask god direct questions and receive answers from him/her/it/housecat. You failed miserably. As did your "god"."  This is something so common here that it's amazing that you clearly were incapable of comprehending it.  

Drich - READ THE PARABLE MORON! "My Claim" is contained within the boundaries the parable and subsequent explanation of it! No where in the parable is the provision made you do not have to believe in God! SEEKING IS all about Acknoweledging God and trying to find Him. How can one seek if they refuse to acknoweledge what they are looking for? Which makes that whole dishonest mess a non attempt of the "luke 11 message"  

Fuzz - I have no interest in your invisible fantasy god, your Jeebus, or your wholly babble parables.  They're all shit and that's what they have turned what brain you had into.  If you were to pray hard enough to get a message and personal relationship with The Flying Spaghetti Monster, you'd get one.  You'd go around spouting about how you've been blessed and how lasagna noodles told you the secrets of the universe.

Fuzz  Abaddon asked for proof, you were incapable, as usual, of providing proof. 

Drich  I can only show you where to go to find it. "proof" is in the doing and ultimatly between you and God. Not you and me as I am not God.
Fuzz - God does not exist.  I prayed intently for 40 years.  I'm completely done with searching for something that does not exist.  And you cannot provide proof it does.
Your response was typical gibberish claiming victory because you seem to think that we should believe your fantasies. 

Drich  I am not Here for you subsequently YOU don't have to believe anything. I am here for those truly looking for answers. You seek assurance from your peer that you are on the collective path. you have never activly participated in anything that does not reaffirm your close minded world view. so again you and people like you.. I expect nothing from. that reason I answer you is because others who I am here for have the very same questions and they may never ask them

Fuzz  Quoting Abaddon was simply providing support of his position.

MOST people are members of this forum because they are Atheists, and they want intelligent discussions with other Atheists.  There are a few theists on this forum who seem to genuinely want to connect, to learn how others think, and to re-examine their own beliefs.  Then there are the ASSHOLES like you who think that you - someone so very obviously uneducated - have ANSWERS THAT WE NEED and the YOU are the person sent to teach us.  My path away from Pentecostalism and that brand of ignorant, closed-minded thinking has been a very long one.  

Fuzz  All you do is hurl childish playground insults and insult people's intelligence when they disagree with something you posted. 

Drich  Truly take the time and read the anger that comes out of your collective mouths ask yourself how would anyone of you react when everything you say is met with anger and venom? where my intellegence is question, on everything from spelling and grammer to my deeply held religious beliefs. by not one or two of you but by everyone! how many 60 page hate threads were dedicated to your expulsion behind your back? when you are in so much contempt all of the time you either give as good as you get or you drown in the poop other throw.  Fuzz - So leave. Atheist anger only tends to come out when people think we need to accept their delusions and insult us when we don't.

I have always put the same effort into my responses you all put into your posts. meaning if you don't like being insulted 5 times, your intellegence questioned 4 times and your momma spoken of, then i suggest you do not insult me 5 time call me stupid 4 times and speak bad about y mother.

I unlike you guys am not like this. this anger is counter my nature. I have to seriously think about what to say to meet the quotas you all set for me in the insult catagory.

It's play ground rules here, if you can not respect me for who I am you will respect me because I can swing and hit as hard or if not just a little harder than you do.

I am usally very funny (btw most of you take for ignorance or gibberish) and unload you bile and anger on a tom hanks quote or something obi wan said.  
Fuzz - Yeah, that wasn't English either.  Jeebus Cracker on a unicycle, doesn't your computer even have spell-check?

You claim to have proof, you constantly provide none. 

Drich  And I do. for me. Fine. It's your private belief, so shut up about it.  God will do the same for you if you do as I did. Nope.  Not a church thing, not a confession thing not a change your anything thing. It is a between you and God and no one else has to know thing. All He asks is if you follow completely what was said in luke 11  Fuzz - "Luke 11:9-10" is total bullshit, as is every other word in the wholly babble.  

Fuzz You told Jor that all of your claims come from vetted sources, and you never provide a single one.

Drich  nupe I told that to Grand muff, and she cut in to that conversation.
I said my FACTS meaning what I have to say about God is vetted was what the orginal conversation was about.  Fuzz - Vetted means scientifically tested and peer-reviewed, not the little voices in your head.

Fuzz   I supported the positions of fellow forum members and you throw a tantrum worthy of a 6-year old about . . . brownies?? . . . using 6-year-old logic, grammar, and spelling. 

Drich  and you wonder why I then subsequently dissect your posts scowering them for real lapses in intelligence like fallacious logic, closed minded reasoning,dishonest representation of previous quotes and or the fact checking I do. Why? because spelling and grammar are the faults of a small child, something to grow out of.. however intellectual dishonesty, defaulting arguments to fallacious logic, habitually misrepresenting verifiable facts... those are serious/critical flaws in one's base intellect. you can't just grow out of them, as they are greater indicators of a systemic failure to process information on one's own behalf...   Fuzz - This from someone who spews fairy tales and old fables as if they are real.

Fuzz  We ask for proof that your imaginary friend exists, and we get the typical infantile temper tantrum.  Boo-hoo.  Go run home to mommy. 

Drich  ASK HIM MORON!
That is the only way it works! As God rather see you to Hell proper, than bend himself into the circus clown (Doing tricks on demand) most of you would have Him be so you feel comfortable enough to worship! Especially in light of all that He has already done!  Fuzz - Ask Who?  Marduk? Ahura Mazda? Zoroaster? Osiris? Odin? Mithras? Cerunnos? -- Your Jehovah is just another fiction, made up by witch doctor con artists in order to control people.  What "he" has already done?  He's done absolutely nothing.  He's so incompetent that today - in an age when a child can post information and have it go viral all over the world, he can't even prove he exists.  He has to use ignorant, egotistical, offensive, insulting, asshole PREACHERS that yammer on about "if you only pray hard enough". And, compared with the few old "deities" listed above, Jehovah is the biggest asshole of the bunch. We don't even need to read the wholly babble for confirmation of this - all we have to do is read your posts.
Fuzz

[/quote]

[Nay_Sayer]

Naengmyeon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naengmyeon

So like I said "My group is bigger than yours'.

However and I hope you're sitting down because all religions have stolen from thee Pastafarian text you are Pastafarians, ergo my group is the biggest.

Additional note: Walls of texts are for sinners.

RAmen