Incredulous Logic

[Statler Waldorf]

LOL@ omnipresent gods, so Yahweh is the god of the hair between my ass checks, and is in fact present between my ass cheeks. You'd think I would've noticed.

Your inability to notice the obvious is not a reflection on God in any way; it is a reflection on your depravity. So you never answered, your brain does not exist because you never produced that picture? That explains a lot.

---

Can you prove this? Believing things without proof again I see.

Who does that remind us of?

Everyone.

[The Grand Nudger]

I expected gods rubbery one to be larger. I guess I should have taken a page out of the ladies book and questioned my expectations.

[Ace Otana]

Normal humans don't perform miracles, predict future events, and rise from the dead three days later.

No they don't. However humans have made false allegations, like claiming they had known a future event but really didn't. Pretending to know. Claim they knew after the event took place. Also miracles? Today's magicians fool us pretty easily but at least we know it's an illusion, back then people thought lightning was a godly thing sent by the gods. Obviously simple tricks back then were more than just illusions. Mix it with a good lie and you have yourself a human-god. Also the rising from the dead, any evidence for this? Once again, you're just taking their word for it.

So that's just not going to cut it.

Nor's your baseless assertions.

No I would not believe you, Thor does not exist.

Prove it. If you can take iron age people's word for it alone, your standards must be pretty damn low.

The point was that Christians do not believe in an invisible man who lives in the sky, that was nothing more than a question begging epithet on your part, argue against actual Christianity sometime and maybe we can have a discussion.

So you don't claim that he's invisible or that it's a he?
Define your god.

[The Grand Nudger]

Can you prove this? Believing things without proof again I see.

Let wonder lead you to knowledge
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/...speed.html

So get yourself to HD 126614 Ab, out in Taurus. Should be able to catch the year 1775 from there.

[Cinjin]

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/...speed.html

Good article. Very interesting. Too bad, Statler and the brothers-in-christ will never read it and comprehend its logic.

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Statler Waldorf Wrote: Can you prove this? Believing things without proof again I see.

Is Stat being ironic? Surely not; I didn't think he had the wit. Oh, it's humbug.

[Statler Waldorf]

No they don't. However humans have made false allegations, like claiming they had known a future event but really didn't. Pretending to know. Claim they knew after the event took place. Also miracles? Today's magicians fool us pretty easily but at least we know it's an illusion, back then people thought lightning was a godly thing sent by the gods. Obviously simple tricks back then were more than just illusions. Mix it with a good lie and you have yourself a human-god. Also the rising from the dead, any evidence for this? Once again, you're just taking their word for it.

So Jesus was just an ancient David Copperfield? I find that pretty tough to believe. There is lots of evidence believers accept for Christ's resurrection, there is no evidence you will accept given your worldview.

Prove it. If you can take iron age people's word for it alone, your standards must be pretty damn low.

The infallible Triune God of scripture who cannot lie says that Thor does not exist; you can't have better proof than that.

So you don't claim that he's invisible or that it's a he?
Define your god.

Man was created in the image of God, so to call God a man is as backwards as calling Walt Disney a cartoon character. God is omnipresent, so to say his home is in the sky is also wrong.

---

Let wonder lead you to knowledge
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/...speed.html

So get yourself to HD 126614 Ab, out in Taurus. Should be able to catch the year 1775 from there.

So you are appealing to Einstein's Theory of Relativity which assumes as convention beforehand that light travels at the same speed in all directions relative to the observer to prove that light travels in all directions at the same velocity relative to an observer? I asked you for proof, not this circularity garbage.

---

Statler Waldorf Wrote: Can you prove this? Believing things without proof again I see.

Is Stat being ironic? Surely not; I didn't think he had the wit. Oh, it's humbug.

The ironic thing is that everyone believes certain things without proof or evidence; atheists just don't fess up to this fact but then they go after other people for having the intellectual honesty to fess up to their assumptions.

[The Grand Nudger]

You must have glanced over the part where the speed of light has been confirmed by many experiments. Try again. (That was of course a quote from the original link I sent, had you bothered to read it.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_ge...relativity

Everyone should know this. It's high school physics, not exactly bleeding edge stuff. Were we to discover something that turned our idea on it's head, and light traveled at a different speed, or variable speeds, I would simply suggest another planet from which to view 1775. Wouldn't make your objection any less ridiculous.

[Cinjin]

No they don't. However humans have made false allegations, like claiming they had known a future event but really didn't. Pretending to know. Claim they knew after the event took place. Also miracles? Today's magicians fool us pretty easily but at least we know it's an illusion, back then people thought lightning was a godly thing sent by the gods. Obviously simple tricks back then were more than just illusions. Mix it with a good lie and you have yourself a human-god. Also the rising from the dead, any evidence for this? Once again, you're just taking their word for it.

So Jesus was just an ancient David Copperfield? I find that pretty tough to believe. There is lots of evidence believers accept for Christ's resurrection, there is no evidence you will accept given your worldview.

Prove it. If you can take iron age people's word for it alone, your standards must be pretty damn low.

The infallible Triune God of scripture who cannot lie says that Thor does not exist; you can't have better proof than that.

So you don't claim that he's invisible or that it's a he?
Define your god.

Man was created in the image of God, so to call God a man is as backwards as calling Walt Disney a cartoon character. God is omnipresent, so to say his home is in the sky is also wrong.

Wow, you've typed so much stupidity into one post, I don't even know where to begin.

Lots of evidence for Jesus Christ ... nope, virtually none.
Jesus Christ even compares to David Copperfield?? ... nope, Copperfield made the statue of liberty disappear and documented it. Documented miracles of jesus...nope
The infallible triune god of scripture ... nope, bible proven to be very very fallible. Click & Learn something for a change
God is omnipresent ... nope, and even if he was wouldn't that indeed mean that he was in the FUCKING sky!!

[thesummerqueen]

Nice improved sig, Cinjin.