Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 4, 2026, 12:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
#61
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 1:22 pm)henryp Wrote: My source for things that would require sources is the 1st hand account from a teacher.  I already told you that.  Although, you should be able reason your way to most of the conclusions.  

There are abusive and neglectful parents.  Those people send their kids to school.  So there are abused and neglected kids in schools.  Abuse and neglect is linked to low incomes (sourced below).  Poor performing schools are in low income neighborhoods.  So the rates of abused/neglected kids is higher in poor schools.  

If a kid shows up at kindergarten hitting and biting, the teacher on top of having to teach them to read, has to teach them the basics of how to behave, which is parenting.  

I guess:

https://www.bctr.cornell.edu/income-ineq...d-neglect/

Would contain statistical evidence that shows that kids in terrible neighborhoods have a higher likelihood of neglect/abuse.  But is this something you didn't know?

I fail to understand why you get defensive when someone asks you to provide sources yet when a theist presents a claim for his or her belief in a deity, you ask them for credible sources and expect them to give you what you want. 

A bit of the pot calling the kettle black, if you ask me. You are asking me to just take your word for it based on another person's experience and it took you a few pages of back and forth bullshit just to get one link from you that you could have provided without the smart ass "you should have known that" comments. 

I think we're done here.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
#62
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 12:39 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:
(July 2, 2018 at 12:06 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: I doubt funding for the Detroit city school system is the biggest problem here. According to this article in the Detroit News, the Detroit public school system is budgeted for $732,000,000 for the 2018-19 school year for an estimated 50,875 students. That's $14,388 per student for the year. That's not a bad budget considering Detroit is broke. It’s a lot better than a lot of other school systems that do more with less.

Quote:The Detroit Public Schools have been under the direct authority of the State of Michigan for 11 of the past 15 years, and remain so today.  During this period, the State’s disinvestment and deliberate indifference has contributed to a precipitous decline in the school system that has left the approximately 100,000 children of Detroit, overwhelmingly low-income students of color, without the ability to meet their basic educational needs.  Although aware of the State’s failure to educate children, the State has taken no effective steps to remedy the massive educational deprivation.

Gary B. v. Snyder

I didn't say they didn't have a funding problem. I said I doubted funding was the biggest problem. Having said that what would you do with additional funds to improve these inner city schools? This whole suite wasn't about a right to literacy. It was about getting more money for the schools. OK, how is getting more money for a school system that is already better funded, despite what detroit-accesstoliteracy.org may claim, than many systems that do better with less going to help? The article I linked earlier sited crumbling infrastructure as a problem. How is new paint on the walls going to help these kids?

The article also said they were short 200 teachers, and having a hard time filling those positions. Higher pay might help to get more teachers, but with a median income of $57,106 teachers in Detroit already earn more than twice the $26,095 median income of the average city resident. Higher salaries aren't going to help much when most teachers simply don't want to work in inner city Detroit schools.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#63
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 2:33 pm)Joods Wrote:
(July 2, 2018 at 1:22 pm)henryp Wrote: My source for things that would require sources is the 1st hand account from a teacher.  I already told you that.  Although, you should be able reason your way to most of the conclusions.  

There are abusive and neglectful parents.  Those people send their kids to school.  So there are abused and neglected kids in schools.  Abuse and neglect is linked to low incomes (sourced below).  Poor performing schools are in low income neighborhoods.  So the rates of abused/neglected kids is higher in poor schools.  

If a kid shows up at kindergarten hitting and biting, the teacher on top of having to teach them to read, has to teach them the basics of how to behave, which is parenting.  

I guess:

https://www.bctr.cornell.edu/income-ineq...d-neglect/

Would contain statistical evidence that shows that kids in terrible neighborhoods have a higher likelihood of neglect/abuse.  But is this something you didn't know?

I fail to understand why you get defensive when someone asks you to provide sources yet when a theist presents a claim for his or her belief in a deity, you ask them for credible sources and expect them to give you what you want. 

A bit of the pot calling the kettle black, if you ask me. You are asking me to just take your word for it based on another person's experience and it took you a few pages of back and forth bullshit just to get one link from you that you could have provided without the smart ass "you should have known that" comments. 

I think we're done here.

You're mimicking skeptical behavior poorly.  Its confusing to deal with because your requests for statistics/sources in this context made no sense.  You can just block me if you want.  That's probably be for the best.
Reply
#64
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 3:33 pm)henryp Wrote:
(July 2, 2018 at 2:33 pm)Joods Wrote: I fail to understand why you get defensive when someone asks you to provide sources yet when a theist presents a claim for his or her belief in a deity, you ask them for credible sources and expect them to give you what you want. 

A bit of the pot calling the kettle black, if you ask me. You are asking me to just take your word for it based on another person's experience and it took you a few pages of back and forth bullshit just to get one link from you that you could have provided without the smart ass "you should have known that" comments. 

I think we're done here.

You're mimicking skeptical behavior poorly.  Its confusing to deal with because your requests for statistics/sources in this context made no sense.  You can just block me if you want.  That's probably be for the best.

Sane people INCLUDING REPUBLICAN INTEL are skeptical of President Shithole. And as long as the FLOTUS supports him and does not condemn him even with her advocating anti bullying, to me, that makes her complicate to his dangerous rhetoric.
Reply
#65
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 3:36 pm)Brian37 Wrote:
(July 2, 2018 at 3:33 pm)henryp Wrote: You're mimicking skeptical behavior poorly.  Its confusing to deal with because your requests for statistics/sources in this context made no sense.  You can just block me if you want.  That's probably be for the best.

Sane people INCLUDING REPUBLICAN INTEL are skeptical of President Shithole. And as long as the FLOTUS supports him and does not condemn him even with her advocating anti bullying, to me, that makes her complicate to his dangerous rhetoric.

wrong thread?
Reply
#66
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
Nah, he's president shithole in every thread.
Reply
#67
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 5:54 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Nah, he's president shithole in every thread.

QFT and it's getting quite tiresome seeing it infest nearly every single thread.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
#68
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 2:53 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: I didn't say they didn't have a funding problem. I said I doubted funding was the biggest problem. Having said that what would you do with additional funds to improve these inner city schools? This whole suite wasn't about a right to literacy. It was about getting more money for the schools. OK, how is getting more money for a school system that is already better funded, despite what detroit-accesstoliteracy.org may claim, than many systems that do better with less going to help? The article I linked earlier sited crumbling infrastructure as a problem. How is new paint on the walls going to help these kids?

The article also said they were short 200 teachers, and having a hard time filling those positions. Higher pay might help to get more teachers, but with a median income of $57,106 teachers in Detroit already earn more than twice the $26,095 median income of the average city resident. Higher salaries aren't going to help much when most teachers simply don't want to work in inner city Detroit schools.

I didn't say they had a funding problem either. What I gleaned from a quick skim of the complaint is that the plaintiffs have issues with the way the state is administrating the schools and the changes to them that have occurred under recent leadership.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#69
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
Betsy DuVoss is in charge of Education on a federal level. She's an incompetent nincompoop who doesn't know her head from her ass and should never have been appointed to Sect'y of Education.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply
#70
RE: Federal Judge rules "No fundamental right to literacy"
(July 2, 2018 at 10:20 pm)Joods Wrote: Betsy DuVoss is in charge of Education on a federal level. She's an incompetent nincompoop who doesn't know her head from her ass and should never have been appointed to Sect'y of Education.

As is just about everyone else who has been appointed. <pres looks around and asks, who is the worst possible person for the job, in the interest of continued US prosperity/human rights and world relations? And who can we fire to make it so?> Fek.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Radical Right Thumpalumpacus 35 14015 June 4, 2025 at 9:46 am
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  HIV drug mandate violates religious freedom, judge rules zebo-the-fat 6 2222 September 9, 2022 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: Divinity
  The far right thinking they know pronouns Paraselene 6 1522 May 27, 2021 at 1:31 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Supreme Court To Take Up Right to Carry Firearm Outside Home onlinebiker 57 10735 April 29, 2021 at 8:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  [Serious] Far-Right Extremism Is a Global Problem WinterHold 164 42268 February 17, 2021 at 7:26 pm
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  [Serious] Far right seizing COVID-19 ‘opportunity’ to expand: Study WinterHold 8 1909 November 23, 2020 at 4:21 am
Last Post: WinterHold
  Sometimes, Cops Get It Right BrianSoddingBoru4 6 1661 August 27, 2020 at 7:49 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Former judge files new motions pushing for special prosecutor in Jussie Smollett case EgoDeath 15 4397 July 1, 2019 at 12:21 am
Last Post: EgoDeath
  Beto using the right tactic. Jackie 36 10602 March 18, 2019 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: Belacqua
  Alex Jones and Infowars gets 'disappeared' - are we headed in the right direction? Angrboda 203 57119 December 28, 2018 at 2:36 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)