DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Abaddon_ire]

The information in DNA acts like machine code.

Well now. That's quite a claim.

I can directly write in hex and mnemonic forms machine code for Z80, 68xx, 40,xxx and x86 platforms. It is NOTHING like DNA.

There are only a few reasons you would make such a claim

A. You heard it from some creatard source and are mindlessly vomiting it back up right here. That makes you an idiot.
B. You have no idea why it is wrong. That makes you not an engineer and hence a liar.
C. You know it is wrong but post it anyway. That also makes you a liar.

None of these is an attractive look.

The only reason for this claim is the dependence on the fact that most people do not actually know the inner workings of machine code and are thus unable to directly challenge such an assertion. This is, in itself, a dishonest practice.

It so happens that I do.

Your claim is utter bollocks.

[pocaracas]

The information in DNA acts like machine code.

Well now. That's quite a claim.

I can directly write in hex and mnemonic forms machine code for Z80, 68xx, 40,xxx and x86 platforms. It is NOTHING like DNA.

There are only a few reasons you would make such a claim

A. You heard it from some creatard source and are mindlessly vomiting it back up right here. That makes you an idiot.
B. You have no idea why it is wrong. That makes you not an engineer and hence a liar.
C. You know it is wrong but post it anyway. That also makes you a liar.

None of these is an attractive look.

The only reason for this claim is the dependence on the fact that most people do not actually know the inner workings of machine code and are thus unable to directly challenge such an assertion. This is, in itself, a dishonest practice.

It so happens that I do.

Your claim is utter bollocks.

Well then... why don't you educate CDF instead of just insults insults insults?

[Abaddon_ire]

Well now. That's quite a claim.

I can directly write in hex and mnemonic forms machine code for Z80, 68xx, 40,xxx and x86 platforms. It is NOTHING like DNA.

There are only a few reasons you would make such a claim

A. You heard it from some creatard source and are mindlessly vomiting it back up right here. That makes you an idiot.
B. You have no idea why it is wrong. That makes you not an engineer and hence a liar.
C. You know it is wrong but post it anyway. That also makes you a liar.

None of these is an attractive look.

The only reason for this claim is the dependence on the fact that most people do not actually know the inner workings of machine code and are thus unable to directly challenge such an assertion. This is, in itself, a dishonest practice.

It so happens that I do.

Your claim is utter bollocks.

Well then... why don't you educate CDF instead of just insults insults insults?

Tried that earlier in this thread. It doesn't work.

[The Grand Nudger]

This isn't the first time that anything cdf says has been said, in this thread, lol.  He's already been educated - he's just a blockhead incapable of learning, lol. 

Hell, he hasn't even learned how to be a better troll or a better christian or a better apologist, after all these pages. The only reason the thread has gone on as it has is due to the enterprising effort of so many other posters boosting his sad..low energy, and repetitious content.

[Angrboda]

Still waiting for evidence that the complexity and function of living systems could not have slowly evolved.  

Both the complexity and function that we see in living systems could not have just evolved slowly over time.

[no one]

The evidence is in the scientific genius of the ancient chronicles of cave dwelling goat fuckers and thier wish granting magic sky daddy.

[unfogged]

History's most famous scientists believed in a Creator as do many scientists around the world today.

That is true, but they are famous for the work they did when they set aside their belief in magic and followed the evidence to determine how things actually work. What they believe that is beyond what they can demonstrate to be true is utterly irrelevant to their scientific credentials.

[The Grand Nudger]

I think that most believers who take solace in that aren't doing it because they actually believe that smart people (or scientists) believing something makes it true or even credible.  Obviously, this one doesn't believe in what many of those smart religious scientists assert and can even demonstrate to be true, namely... fucking biology, lol.  

They do it so that they don't confirm any nascent suspicions they have or to handle dissonance from accusations that they must be complete fucking idiots for believing this silly shit.

This isn't a thought that could escape them..since they commonly see believers in other silly religions as complete idiots who believe in silly shit.  It makes them feel better not to be the only person in that room. If some other person, some smarter person, some better educated person...could believe in the same silly shit....well, even if it is silly shit, they don't have to be a mouthbreather to believe it.

Good enough for god and government work.

[Anomalocaris]

This isn't the first time that anything cdf says has been said, in this thread, lol.  He's already been educated - he's just a blockhead incapable of learning, lol. 

Hell, he hasn't even learned how to be a better troll or a better christian or a better apologist, after all these pages.  The only reason the thread has gone on as it has is due to the enterprising effort of so many other posters boosting his sad..low energy, and repetitious content.

Is a rat that scurries through the university’s lecture hall and within ear shot of the lecture given in it more “educated” than his fellows who stayed in the corners and recesses of the kitchen and dinning room?

[Bucky Ball]

History's most famous scientists believed in a Creator as do many scientists around the world today.

Argument from authority fallacy ... their expertise is in their own limited fields. 
Being an expert in Fluid Dynamics does not make their opinions on how to do a mitral valve replacement worth anything.