DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

It is in the article.

Didn't you just say you never lied?  Maybe you're just confused..here..because a couple of posts back, you conceded that there was nothing in that article about eternal life.  There -still- isn't anything in that article about eternal life.  You've -still- failed to provide any citation for your claim.

It's put up or shut up time.  

You obviously did not read the entire article. And food proves God. Plants are not conscious life. Food that is delicious and that also provides energy would not just magically appear here along with all conscious life. Sorry, it's a fail for atheism YAY I win I win.

Food proves god.  Yeah, that's fuckin brilliant, goober.  How have I managed to stumble through my turgid existence all of this time without realizing that!

What I said was recent discoveries in quantum biology coupled with quantum mechanics multiverse theory could soon prove eternal life. Don't try to change what I said. 


How did you manage that? 93% of the world got it before you did! Oh well, you had your fun being an atheist.

[The Grand Nudger]

What I said was recent discoveries in quantum biology coupled with quantum mechanics multiverse theory could soon prove eternal life. Don't try to change what I said. 

Which they don't, and which you've had ample time to cite if they did, and which you tried to slide by an empty citation of.  You're a liar on every front.

How did you manage that? 93% of the world got it before you did! Oh well, you had your fun being an atheist.

Allah Akbar, pass the salt!

[vulcanlogician]

Add to that that we have consciuosness, intelligence, a sex drive, a will to live, eyes that see, ears that hear, a nose that smells, arms that hug, legs that can walk, complex DNA, an immune system that could not have possibly come to be without an intelligent agent.

Subtract from that rape, genocide, disease, poverty, widespread ignorance, religious figures who molest children, and you end up with a wash.

Note: I don't normally argue "the problem of evil" unless someone comes at me with "the solution of good." Your argument fails. Try again.

[The Grand Nudger]

LOL< we've got ourselves a Bananaman and a Beheite.  It can't get any better for a creationism thread.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

Think we scared the dolt off.

Stupid creature. Maybe the next one will have something about them

[purplepurpose]

Everena, what religion are you from?

[Silver]

I'm guessing that Bahai nonsense.

[The Grand Nudger]

You know what I've always found interesting?  That creationists from every religion have more in common with each other than any of them do with their respective religions non creationists.

[no one]

Joods:
Can the Troll-B-Gone spray be used yet?



Unfortunately, no. Much like MRSA, They've become resistant.

[Angrboda]

Scientists do not suspect the complex information in DNA came from nothing.  They believe it came from simpler elements by a process which adds information.  Nothing that has been presented in this thread makes that impossible and the evidence indicates that it is very possible.



As noted, nobody is arguing that DNA came from nothing.  The reason they believe that DNA evolved is because we have evidence of the process of evolution from simpler DNA and plausible explanations for how simpler elements which could evolve into DNA based life forms could have originated.  That is neither a cop-out nor a straw man.  I don't think you know what a cop-out or a straw man argument is.

Because you are completely avoiding mentioning the first cause of life and jumping right to what happened after that. We all know what happened after that and something like DNA would not just evolve out of nothing for no reason and with no intelligent driving force. It's like our sex drive and our will to live. Those things don't just happen without intelligence. How could "nothing" possibly care if our species survived or not?

No, I am not. I explicitly stated that we have plausible explanations for how DNA based life may have come to be. And you're still misrepresenting the fact that people think that life came from nothing. It is hypothesized that life came from simpler organizations of matter, not nothing, so you continue to dishonestly push a straw man.

Beyond that, you have the same problem that CDF47 has had, namely showing that life and DNA could not have arisen from simpler matter through natural processes. Until you do that, all the rest of your arguments are just an irrelevant shit show.