DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Amarok]

Yes, I do know that since new living systems need new (often upgraded) information.

Lol upgrades that's the weak post hoc to explain away macro evolution ever

---

We just disagree on DNA proving design and a multiverse.

No we don't disagreement implies two equally valid positions 

Yours is baseless nonsense pulled out of ID's ass 

Mine is actual science

---

Just following the facts where they lead and those facts aren't always what the TV tells me they are

No you don't you blindly obey ID propagandists and ignore the actual scientists

---

Yes, I can tell the difference.  I know, for instance, that this universe and everything in it is designed.

No you don't you believe on fallacies that it  is

[CDF47]

DNA is evidence that there is no designer.

DNA is a system that along with evolution by natural selection negates the requirement for a designer.
The interactions of random mutations. The causes of which are known to science and chemicals (DNA) which are also known to science, explain all life without requiring any other intervention.
We even have valid and testable ideas of how this came to be abiogenesis.


I do know what CDF will say in response this he will just parrot the same thing he has always done and was told by his pastor , reverend,rabbi, imam or whatever.

But can I just say for this one moment I have posted last and so am winning.

You're so far off on this.

---

We just disagree on DNA proving design and a multiverse.

---

 Yes. We do disagree on how DNA proves design of a Universe.

I know that's not an exact quote... Nor even a close paraphrase BUT your reply CDF47... actually leaves a lot to be desired.

I;m not sure if it's been hedged before but... Is Enligh not your first language?

I know it's my second language (Bad English being my first. ) Or, like me, might you just be a poor speller?

EDIT: Whoah! There's a side step I missed!

So... CDF47... care to explain which of your two statements were incorrect?

This isn't Technical and Professional Communication Class.  I was making a post on an Internet thread using my cell phone.  Every word was spelled correctly.  We disagree that DNA proves design and we also disagree that there is a multiverse.  I believe DNA proves design and the multiverse does not exist.  How is that?  Better for you?

---

Yes, I do know that since new living systems need new (often upgraded) information.

I remember you accepting micro evolution. Could not successive micro steps lead to a macro step that would, afterwards, look as if new information had been added?
Or have you found a mechanism in DNA that prevents such larger changes over many many generations?

The evidence does not suggest that, rather, there are explosions of life in the fossil record.  Study the Cambrian Explosion.

---

Yes, I do know that since new living systems need new (often upgraded) information.

Lol upgrades that's the weak post hoc to explain away macro evolution ever

---

We just disagree on DNA proving design and a multiverse.

No we don't disagreement implies two equally valid positions 

Yours is baseless nonsense pulled out of ID's ass 

Mine is actual science

---

Just following the facts where they lead and those facts aren't always what the TV tells me they are

No you don't you blindly obey ID propagandists and ignore the actual scientists

---

Yes, I can tell the difference.  I know, for instance, that this universe and everything in it is designed.

No you don't you believe on fallacies that it  is

The information includes both more complex species of life and less complex species of life.  New species that are more complex are upgraded species with new information.

Mine is actual science.  

No, I don't.

No, I don't.

[Abaddon_ire]

Does it? How would you know? And you have lied continuously throughout this thread right from it's inception. You are a standing advertisement for why one should not believe unless one is prepared to become utterly immoral.

Re-post a post where I lied. Good luck. Calling me a liar is a false accusation.

You lied about Adam and Eve over and over and over. Because you are a liar.

[CDF47]

Re-post a post where I lied. Good luck. Calling me a liar is a false accusation.

You lied about Adam and Eve over and over and over. Because you are a liar.

How did I lie about that?

[The Grand Nudger]

Why ask, you're not going to engage with any answer you're given anymore than you engaged with any other answer in these last 1200 pages.  You're fundamentally incapable of honesty.  You'll just reassert your beliefs like a nut.

If you believed that I was the fuckin squatch I could point to my picture all day long and you'd maintain that no one had demonstrated otherwise. Obviously pictures of human beings are an a-squatchistic conspiracy to miseducate you.

Loon.

[CDF47]

Why ask, you're not going to engage with any answer you're given anymore than you engaged with any other answer in these last 1200 pages.  You're fundamentally incapable of honesty.  You'll just reassert your beliefs like a nut.

If you believed that I was the fuckin squatch I could point to my picture all day long and you'd maintain that no one had demonstrated otherwise. Obviously pictures of human beings are an a-squatchistic conspiracy to miseducate you.

Loon.

I've engaged and read nearly everything here. I respond most the time too. Not sure what your going on about now. Each response was honest.

[Abaddon_ire]

You lied about Adam and Eve over and over and over. Because you are a liar.

How did I lie about that?

You claimed that science shows that all people are descended from one man and one woman. that was a lie because science does not do any such thing. This was all explained to you. Nevertheless, you continued to shovel the same shit. That makes it a knowing intentional lie.

[Amarok]

DNA is evidence that there is no designer.

DNA is a system that along with evolution by natural selection negates the requirement for a designer.
The interactions of random mutations. The causes of which are known to science and chemicals (DNA) which are also known to science, explain all life without requiring any other intervention.
We even have valid and testable ideas of how this came to be abiogenesis.


I do know what CDF will say in response this he will just parrot the same thing he has always done and was told by his pastor , reverend,rabbi, imam or whatever.

But can I just say for this one moment I have posted last and so am winning.

You're so far off on this.

---

 Yes. We do disagree on how DNA proves design of a Universe.

I know that's not an exact quote... Nor even a close paraphrase BUT your reply CDF47... actually leaves a lot to be desired.

I;m not sure if it's been hedged before but... Is Enligh not your first language?

I know it's my second language (Bad English being my first. ) Or, like me, might you just be a poor speller?

EDIT: Whoah! There's a side step I missed!

So... CDF47... care to explain which of your two statements were incorrect?

This isn't Technical and Professional Communication Class.  I was making a post on an Internet thread using my cell phone.  Every word was spelled correctly.  We disagree that DNA proves design and we also disagree that there is a multiverse.  I believe DNA proves design and the multiverse does not exist.  How is that?  Better for you?

---

I remember you accepting micro evolution. Could not successive micro steps lead to a macro step that would, afterwards, look as if new information had been added?
Or have you found a mechanism in DNA that prevents such larger changes over many many generations?

The evidence does not suggest that, rather, there are explosions of life in the fossil record.  Study the Cambrian Explosion.

---

Lol upgrades that's the weak post hoc to explain away macro evolution ever

---

No we don't disagreement implies two equally valid positions 

Yours is baseless nonsense pulled out of ID's ass 

Mine is actual science

---

No you don't you blindly obey ID propagandists and ignore the actual scientists

---

No you don't you believe on fallacies that it  is

The information includes both more complex species of life and less complex species of life.  New species that are more complex are upgraded species with new information.

Mine is actual science.  

No, I don't.

No, I don't.

Nope still ad hoc explaining away 

Nope yours is not science in any way 

Yes you do

Yes you do

[Abaddon_ire]

Why ask, you're not going to engage with any answer you're given anymore than you engaged with any other answer in these last 1200 pages.  You're fundamentally incapable of honesty.  You'll just reassert your beliefs like a nut.

If you believed that I was the fuckin squatch I could point to my picture all day long and you'd maintain that no one had demonstrated otherwise.  Obviously pictures of human beings are an a-squatchistic conspiracy to miseducate you.  

Loon.

I've engaged and read nearly everything here. I respond most the time too. Not sure what your going on about now. Each response was honest.

No, you haven't. All you do is repeat the claim over and over ad nauseum. You are not engaging with anything except your pastors instructions.

[Amarok]

Why ask, you're not going to engage with any answer you're given anymore than you engaged with any other answer in these last 1200 pages.  You're fundamentally incapable of honesty.  You'll just reassert your beliefs like a nut.

If you believed that I was the fuckin squatch I could point to my picture all day long and you'd maintain that no one had demonstrated otherwise.  Obviously pictures of human beings are an a-squatchistic conspiracy to miseducate you.  

Loon.

I've engaged and read nearly everything here. I respond most the time too. Not sure what your going on about now. Each response was honest.

No you didn't and no it wasn't

---

You lied about Adam and Eve over and over and over. Because you are a liar.

How did I lie about that?

Your whole position is a lie