DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

That's nice, and I have some followups on that whenever you get around to responding to what you quoted.

Go ahead with the follow-up questions.

---

I don't believe we slowly descended from monkeys.

NO!

Bad Zoot ! Naughty Zoot !

You don't go lighting the grail fires to attract questing Knights!

And you don't go telling the lies about humans descending from moneys !

If this keeps happening, there will be a spanking!

He doesn't understand my point here.  This is what I do not believe.

---

I don't believe we slowly descended from monkeys.

Good thing evolution doesn't say that then

---

Some believe Neanderthals fall into beasts of the field, Biblically speaking.  They have a pretty common body design with humans but they have differences.  I do not believe Neanderthals are counted as human beings.  Some believe the opposite, that they fall into the human category, which I disagree with.

Mystic crap  Neanderthals were an offshoot of homo family and your opinions based feverish fairytales means nothing 

---

No, but DNA indicates that

No it doesn't

Yeah, that is a good thing.  There are those that do say that though.

So they are like humans.  Not a big deal Scripturally.

Yes, it does.

[The Grand Nudger]

Why move on to some other thing when you won't respond to the last?  Should I expect different next time?  You wanted a discussion about this very important subject, it's up to you whether or not you engage.

[CDF47]

They may fall in the human category then as many believe. Either that or they are considered beasts of the field Bibically speaking. Not every beast is named. That's not the point of the book.

Speaking of the naming of the beasts ...
Genesis 2:19
"Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals. But for Adam none of them proved to be a suitable mate."

Ahem.
"Proved to be a suitable mate".
1. Kind of a dumb god ya got there, doesn't know what to make him for a mate.
2. What were the "tryouts" like ?

There were no tryouts.  He made him Eve.

---

I've read plenty of science books in the past.

It is unknown whether the first MtEve and YAdam ever met.

You are claiming that they did. Prove it.

---

I've read plenty of science books in the past.

It is unknown whether the first MtEve and YAdam ever met.

But it is known that mtEve had a mother and at least one sister. And similarly, at least one aunt. It's right there in the definition of what mtEve actually is.

This is rather easy to prove, unlike most aspects of the theory.

1. Find any matrilineal lineage that leads to mtEve's mother.

2. Find any matrilineal lineage that does not lead to mtEve's mother. 

3. Two tasks accomplished. 
A. mtEve's mother exists.
and
B. mtEve's mother is not mtEve.

You are still missing the key word "matrilineal" either because you know that it is fatal to your argument or you simply are that stupid.

---

OK CDF, let's try this from a different direction.

There actually is a way that your idiotic belief that everyone can be traced back to one particular man and one particular woman can work quite easily.

The solution is really straightforward. You acknowledge that something in the region of 128 billion humans have ever existed. That's a fuzzy figure at best, but roughly works.  Personally, in such discussions, I go with 120, but close enough. We can never reach any accurate count so approximations must suffice.

To make your idea work, all of them, all 128 billion of them male and female, without exception must have had at least one son and at least one daughter who both reproduced. That is the only way your daft idea can work. Were it otherwise, either a male or female lineage would go extinct.

You are claiming that this is so, everyone without exception must have had a minimum of one son AND one daughter.

Do you think that is a reasonable claim to make?

I can't prove they met.  Scripturally, they did.

There was incest in the beginning to populate the Earth.  Some had many sons and daughters and others had few to none.  This is the way it worked out.

---

Why move on to some other thing when you won't respond to the last?  Should I expect different next time?  You wanted a discussion about this very important subject, it's up to you whether or not you engage.

I did engage and I answered your question.

[LadyForCamus]

This one time...

at band camp...

[The Valkyrie]

This one time...

at band camp...

Flute abuse!

[The Grand Nudger]

OFC I had follow up questions in the case that you were committed to lying your ass off, lol.

So, since you insist that genetics does indeed indicate common descent then why do you reject common descent?  

If genetics doesn't rule out the notion that mteve and yadam were mates then why do the same geneticists who do this work think that it does, in your opinion?

See...two questions that you ought to be the undisputed expert on, on these boards.  Why do you believe contradictory things, and why do you think everyone who knows jack shit about this has it wrong?

I don't believe we slowly descended from monkeys.

Nowhere does someone go on record stating the two were definitely not mates dating back to the first man and woman.

---

Why move on to some other thing when you won't respond to the last?  Should I expect different next time?  You wanted a discussion about this very important subject, it's up to you whether or not you engage.

I did engage and I answered your question.

Why lie, it's not as if the boards disappeared since you last posted.  I'll wait.

[LastPoet]

This one time...

  at band camp...

Flute abuse!

Is that what kids call it like that?

[CDF47]

I don't believe we slowly descended from monkeys.

Nowhere does someone go on record stating the two were definitely not mates dating back to the first man and woman.

---

I did engage and I answered your question.

Why lie, it's not as if the boards disappeared since you last posted.  I'll wait.

I already answered your question. You may not have liked the answer.

[The Grand Nudger]

Sure, and fish is an "answer" to the question "what is 2+2".  Silly lies are silly.

I'll wait.

[CDF47]

Sure, and fish is an "answer" to the question "what is 2+2".  Silly lies are silly.

I'll wait.

What exactly do you want to know that I didn't already answer?