Anal Intercourse is a Dangerous Hobby

[Agnostico]

If your syphilis story is irrelevant, why bring it up?

Someone asked

You said you were condoning risky sexual behaviour when you wrote

I didn't mean to write that, my bad

You were pretty clear that the only option to virginity is being a slut

No that's not what i meant. 

If you contract an STD its not because other people are having anal sex, its because you didnt protect yourself or you got unlucky.

People having unprotected anal sex is the reason why STDs are so high
But I never blamed anyone else but myself for what I did. 

I feel like the OP was trying to create a slippery slope, he really wants to show anal sex is harmful so he can say homosexuality is harmful, just my opinion.

All im saying is that anal sex is harmful yet the rejection is overwhelming

@SUNGULA 
The many hostile responses, denials and allegations is evidence that this topic is not as open and well received as you suggest
U even said that this is an argument used to target gay people. So one can't bring it up which is basically what the gay man was saying

[The Architect Of Fate]

The many hostile responses, denials and allegations is evidence that this topic is not as open and well received as you suggest

And i already explained why your getting hostile responses ,And it has nothing to do with the topics taboo nature
 

U even said that this is an argument used to target gay people. So one can't bring it up which is basically what the gay man was saying

1.Yes it is 

2. No on said that 

3. Being gay doesn't make him right 

---

All im saying is that anal sex is harmful yet the rejection is overwhelming

No it's not

[Agnostico]

And i already explained why your getting hostile responses ,And it has nothing to do with the topics taboo nature

U just admitted this topic gets hostile responses. We are in agreement

[The Architect Of Fate]

And i already explained why your getting hostile responses ,And it has nothing to do with the topics taboo nature

U just admitted this topic gets hostile responses. We are in agreement

No i didn't .I pointed out why YOU get hostile responses not the topic ,So we don't agree .

[Agnostico]

U just admitted this topic gets hostile responses. We are in agreement

No i didn't .I pointed out why YOU get hostile responses not the topic ,So we don't agree .

You said
"They called you a homophobe because "the risks" is often an attempt by Conservatives anti LGBT types to demonize gay people"

The topic is "the risks" and anyone who tries to bring it up gets labelled a homophobe among all kinds of other insults. This thread is evidence for that

Take yourself for example, uv been hostile from the start accusing me of religious obsession. Even now ur still being hostile over nothing

All im doing is promoting safe sex but very few people here support it. Seems to clash with their ideology.

[The Architect Of Fate]

No i didn't .I pointed out why YOU get hostile responses not the topic ,So we don't agree .

You said
"They called you a homophobe because "the risks" is often an attempt by Conservatives anti LGBT types to demonize gay people"

The topic is "the risks" and anyone who tries to bring it up gets labelled a homophobe among all kinds of other insults. This thread is evidence for that

Take yourself for example, uv been hostile from the start accusing me of religious obsession. Even now ur still being hostile over nothing

All im doing is promoting safe sex but very few people here support it. Seems to clash with their ideology.

1. Yes the topic is the risks which has not invoked the hostility .Questions of your motivation for bringing it as some people who do often have less then noble intentions .So no this is not evidence.

2. Yes i questioned your motivations but never denied the topic and if you interpret my last comment  as hostile then you have a low bar (FYI i never accused you of religious obsession i did question your motives but not without reason .

3. To my knowledge no one here has objected to safe sex .Nor am i aware of it clashing with anyone's ideology

So no simply bringing up the subject isn't the cause of hostility .The motivations of religious types bringing it up can invoke hostility as often they have ulterior motives for doing so .

[no one]

The opening remarks are quite unwelcoming. They reek of apathy and hostility, not exactly sure why you expect any cordial, sympathetic responses.

[The Architect Of Fate]

If Mr Brewer brought this up or Mr.wizard they would not face hostility as the chances of them being a homophobe are nil . The same cannot be presupposed for the OP.

At pro LGBT events were safe sex is discussed (and i have been to plenty) the chances of them being a homophobe are nil. The same cannot be presupposed for online forum threads

[Mr.wizard]

Your getting push back because your saying, "anal sex is harmful", and it has pointed out to you that while anal sex can be harmful it doesn't mean that it's always harmful, it's not like every time you have anal sex you get an STD. It's like saying driving a car is harmful because your chances of dying in a car crash increase when you drive one.

[Agnostico]

So no simply bringing up the subject isn't the cause of hostility .The motivations of religious types bringing it up can invoke hostility as often they have ulterior motives for doing so

Your getting push back because your saying, "anal sex is harmful"

Thanks Mr.wizard for confirming the facts. Im getting push back because im telling the truth, not because of any paranoid notions of religious motivations.

So what if someone did have religious motivations. Doesn't change the facts.

it has been pointed out to you that while anal sex can be harmful it doesn't mean that it's always harmful, it's not like every time you have anal sex you get an STD

Apart from contracting STDs there are many other medical risks to anal sex. These risks affect the person being penetrated. 
They can range from a laceration or bleeding to death from anal cancer. Here are some of the medical problems that are caused by anal sex.

perineal cellulitis
enteric fistulae and faecal incontinence
severe perineal laceration
complete anal sphincter complex disruption
anal sphincter injuries
anal incontinence
irritable bowel syndrome
random defaecation
faecal soiling
pelvic congestion
anal sacrococcygeal
fecal peritonitis, 
intraperitoneal peritonitis
rectal perforation
constipation
hemorrhoids
rectal bleeding
abdominal sepsis
blood sepsis
rectal douching
anal fissure
anal fistulas
abscesses
explosion of the rectum and colon
rectal prolapse
anal protrusion
anal cancer 

Just to name a few. 
So while it is not "always harmful" a person becomes morally responsible when it does cause harm.