Atheist VS Naturalist - the latter sounds more appealing to me...

[Succubus#2]

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.

You have asserted, twice, that the supernatural is impossible.

You appear to support this with a video which doesn't address the issue at all.

If you are happy making unsupported assertions and avoiding the burden of proof, I'll stop asking.

Dear sweet suffering Christ! What part of;

'There is no possible way the supernatural can exist'

Do you not understand?

[Belacqua]

You have asserted, twice, that the supernatural is impossible.

You appear to support this with a video which doesn't address the issue at all.

If you are happy making unsupported assertions and avoiding the burden of proof, I'll stop asking.

Dear sweet suffering Christ! What part of;

'There is no possible way the supernatural can exist'

Do you not understand?

I understand the meaning of the words.

You are making a truth claim. You have the burden of proof to show that your claim is true.

You have not offered any argument or evidence to show that your claim is true.

I want logic or evidence before I take your word for something.

[possibletarian]

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.

You have asserted, twice, that the supernatural is impossible.

You appear to support this with a video which doesn't address the issue at all.

If you are happy making unsupported assertions and avoiding the burden of proof, I'll stop asking.

Maybe answer the questions posed to you perhaps, about why you consider the non~natural viable at all ?

Let's try again again.. the non~natural should be considered because...... [answer here]

[Succubus#2]

And I explained twice.
Put the shovel down.

That's Bels bread and butter 

Spew a heap of word salad . Get challenged on it . Spew more word salad . Get challenged on it . 




And down down down he goes

WHF did you find that!  Love it, love it, love it.

[possibletarian]

You have not offered any argument or evidence to show that your claim is true.

I want logic or evidence before I take your word for something.

Sound familiar ?

[Succubus#2]

Dear sweet suffering Christ! What part of;

'There is no possible way the supernatural can exist'

Do you not understand?

I understand the meaning of the words.

You are making a truth claim. You have the burden of proof to show that your claim is true.

You have not offered any argument or evidence to show that your claim is true.

I want logic or evidence before I take your word for something.

Here you go:

[Belacqua]

I understand the meaning of the words.

You are making a truth claim. You have the burden of proof to show that your claim is true.

You have not offered any argument or evidence to show that your claim is true.

I want logic or evidence before I take your word for something.

Here you go:

I already told you that video says nothing about the supernatural.

If you can't support your assertions just say so.

[The Architect Of Fate]

That's Bels bread and butter 

Spew a heap of word salad . Get challenged on it . Spew more word salad . Get challenged on it . 




And down down down he goes

WHF did you find that!  Love it, love it, love it.

Oh it's a gif from a WWE game . Triple H demonstrating the fate of many young wrestlers   

Because as Lemmy from motorhead put it . HE IS THE GAME!!!

---

I understand the meaning of the words.

You are making a truth claim. You have the burden of proof to show that your claim is true.

You have not offered any argument or evidence to show that your claim is true.

I want logic or evidence before I take your word for something.

Here you go:

And Bels response is ignorance or denial 

[Succubus#2]

I already told you that video says nothing about the supernatural.

If you can't support your assertions just say so.

Watch it again, and again, and again till it sinks in.

[The Grand Nudger]

It won't.