A Religious memes are stupid so let's do a quick refutation
![[Image: 12794402_1098948533482521_8759631624810708211_n.jpg]](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bdLpEEWza68/VuGDcox0QOI/AAAAAAAAAZI/S5_IawHZKxI/s1600/12794402_1098948533482521_8759631624810708211_n.jpg)
1. Nah are silly because there core beliefs are silly and most of the silly stuff just comes as a result of the silliness they believe . At least in terms of religion
2.Christian apologists have an agenda to spread their religion most Anti apologist have simply learned enough to know it's all bullshit .So yes i will trust them
3.Something bad happened now we have ask ourselves why a supposed good god would allow it . And all we generally get is pathetic apologetics or the excuse it's not logically contradictory so they don't have to answer
4.No it's an opportunity to once again ask apologists to explain how this is compatable with their so called loving god . You can disbelieve something but still talk about it as a hypothetical
5.Goes to a comment section to point out sciences superiority at actually getting things done . While things like prayer that are suppose to heal people never seem to work despite religious insistence they do
6. No it's the fact you aren't thinking at all as a conclusion by what you actually say and do . And it's possible to think critically and think someone else's thinking is flawed
7.Makes conclusion based on observation of consistent trend among Christians also this one leaves out the other options none of which are much better .
So this is an awful meme apologists need to do better
1. Nah are silly because there core beliefs are silly and most of the silly stuff just comes as a result of the silliness they believe . At least in terms of religion
2.Christian apologists have an agenda to spread their religion most Anti apologist have simply learned enough to know it's all bullshit .So yes i will trust them
3.Something bad happened now we have ask ourselves why a supposed good god would allow it . And all we generally get is pathetic apologetics or the excuse it's not logically contradictory so they don't have to answer
4.No it's an opportunity to once again ask apologists to explain how this is compatable with their so called loving god . You can disbelieve something but still talk about it as a hypothetical
5.Goes to a comment section to point out sciences superiority at actually getting things done . While things like prayer that are suppose to heal people never seem to work despite religious insistence they do
6. No it's the fact you aren't thinking at all as a conclusion by what you actually say and do . And it's possible to think critically and think someone else's thinking is flawed
7.Makes conclusion based on observation of consistent trend among Christians also this one leaves out the other options none of which are much better .
So this is an awful meme apologists need to do better
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
![[Image: AbandonedBruisedFlea-size_restricted.gif]](https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AbandonedBruisedFlea-size_restricted.gif)
