Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 1, 2024, 3:06 am
Atheist Forums › Discussion › Politics v
Expanding The Supreme Court

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Expanding The Supreme Court
Gawdzilla Sama Offline
Banana Hammer
*****
Religious Views: Rational
Posts: 19881
Threads: 324
Joined: July 31, 2016
Reputation: 34
#21
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 6:43 pm
Nobody read my link, I see.
Find
Reply
arewethereyet Offline
Don't make me use my mom voice!
*******
Religious Views: Yawn...
Posts: 16484
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation: 65
#22
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 6:50 pm (This post was last modified: September 26, 2020 at 6:52 pm by arewethereyet.)
(September 26, 2020 at 6:43 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Nobody read my link, I see.

Consoling   I'll go look at it now.

There were a lot if words in that link. That's why I did a copy and paste of the simple answer.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Find
Reply
Aegon Offline Donators
Egg
*****
Religious Views: The Old Gods
Posts: 5941
Threads: 112
Joined: January 8, 2016
Reputation: 50
#23
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 7:44 pm
Give them 18-year term limits
[Image: nL4L1haz_Qo04rZMFtdpyd1OZgZf9NSnR9-7hAWT...dc2a24480e]
Find
Reply
The Architect Of Fate Offline
Supreme Celestial Being
*****
Religious Views: Non Believer
Posts: 11108
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation: 14
#24
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 7:47 pm
(September 26, 2020 at 7:44 pm)Aegon Wrote: Give them 18-year term limits
Good idea as well  Great
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM

      
Find
Reply
Rev. Rye Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Freethinker, ULC Minister
Posts: 12172
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation: 45
#25
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 26, 2020 at 8:23 pm
(September 26, 2020 at 6:43 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: Nobody read my link, I see.

I’m familiar with FDR’s Court-packing plan. While a blatant power grab, it was constitutional. That said, it was controversial even among Democrats, eventually died in committee after a bit less than half a year, and was ultimately rendered moot when A) Owen Roberts switched his vote on one Supreme Court case, and B) Willis van Devanter chose to retire and FDR got to replace him with Hugo Black. And he eventually got to add seven more after that, with a total of five in his second term alone.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Find
Reply
Hillbillyatheist Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 95
Threads: 2
Joined: May 30, 2013
Reputation: 5
#26
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 27, 2020 at 12:13 am (This post was last modified: September 27, 2020 at 12:15 am by Hillbillyatheist. Edit Reason: typos )
it's pointless speculation at least in the short term with regard to packing the court. even if the democrats win, there's enough moderates who would balk at such an idea. That's not to say in the future, should the court over reach too much, that support for court packing wouldn't grow and become politically viable later on, but it could be just as likely a couple justices die and the court swings back to democrats.

my prediction is the seat is filled in October. a win for the GOP. like it or not. vote will be 52-54 in favor of confirming.

Then next year with the democrats having won the election, will face pressure from the base for revenge, but nothing will come of it. they'll come short of the votes they would need even if they tried. Democrats like Joe Manchin, Kyrsten Sinema wouldn't support it. likely they quickly move on to hopefully fixing our economy, dealing with Covid, police reform and such.

it is what it is. you win some, you lose some.
Find
Reply
Rev. Rye Offline Donators
Donator
*****
Religious Views: Freethinker, ULC Minister
Posts: 12172
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation: 45
#27
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 27, 2020 at 12:36 am
Wait, 52-54? Are there 106 senators in this scenario?
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.

[Image: harmlesskitchen.png]

I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Find
Reply
arewethereyet Offline
Don't make me use my mom voice!
*******
Religious Views: Yawn...
Posts: 16484
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation: 65
#28
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 27, 2020 at 1:33 am
(September 27, 2020 at 12:36 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: Wait, 52-54? Are there 106 senators in this scenario?
Perhaps he means that the win will be due to a vote that is 52 to 54 in favor.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Find
Reply
onlinebiker Offline
Senior Member
****
Religious Views: cynical S.O.B.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation: 17
#29
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 27, 2020 at 3:11 am
(September 27, 2020 at 1:33 am)arewethereyet Wrote:
(September 27, 2020 at 12:36 am)Rev. Rye Wrote: Wait, 52-54? Are there 106 senators in this scenario?
Perhaps he means that the win will be due to a vote that is 52 to 54 in favor.

That's how I read it....
Find
Reply
Hillbillyatheist Offline
Newbie
*
Religious Views: Atheist
Posts: 95
Threads: 2
Joined: May 30, 2013
Reputation: 5
#30
RE: Expanding The Supreme Court
September 27, 2020 at 3:31 am
yep. I meant 52 to 54 voting in favor, not 52/54 vote total. LOL
Find
Reply


Atheist Forums › Discussion › Politics v
Expanding The Supreme Court

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Innocence is not enough for the Supreme Court... Rev. Rye 7 726 May 27, 2022 at 6:20 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Navalny’s speech from court Fake Messiah 3 368 February 5, 2021 at 5:36 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Why you should fear Trump's pick for Supreme Court Judge Silver 75 5914 October 31, 2020 at 10:52 am
Last Post: TaraJo
  Amy Coney Barnett officially confirmed as Supreme Court Justice Rev. Rye 33 3258 October 28, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  UK Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful zebo-the-fat 6 823 September 25, 2019 at 1:16 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  The WLB's Next Supreme Court Pick? Minimalist 0 531 March 15, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Supreme Court Cases (and other interesting cases) - A Thread! TheRealJoeFish 11 3979 June 2, 2017 at 11:58 am
Last Post: TheRealJoeFish
  The WLB loses Another Court Fight Minimalist 0 637 May 17, 2017 at 5:48 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
Shocked Republican Party looking forward to the end of the Supreme Court? Rev. Rye 18 5083 October 29, 2016 at 9:41 am
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Please, Mr. Supreme Court, Please.... Minimalist 0 417 August 16, 2016 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)