Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 25, 2024, 12:24 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Objective Morality?
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:20 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: So would we.

Ok how is this possible if atheists define morality as not causing harm to others or something of that nature?

Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:20 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: So would we.

Ah, but we're relying on our own moral compass instead of saying "GodWillsIt". You see, that apparently makes all the difference.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
Whether they find out or not, your causing harm to your relationship and yourself and likely upsetting anyone else who knows. A friend of mine committed adultery (numerous)and I told him not to tell me anymore as I felt guilty whenever I saw his wife.

Suppose what I'm saying is at the very least you're harming yourself, which will affect the relationship and have a knock on affect, at worst(partner still not finding out) innocents who know and feel guilty about knowing, so either way you're doing damage, whether you tell someone or not.
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:27 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Ah, but we're relying on our own moral compass instead of saying "GodWillsIt". You see, that apparently makes all the difference.

I was hoping you’d respond in this thread because this question really is your kryptonite. You stated that we determine what is wrong and right by our social contract and by what hampers our ability to live in a society and so on. Yet if someone commits adultery and is never caught, this has no effect on society whatsoever. So at the very most you could say this was a morally neutral action.

Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
Surely there would some effect on the adulterer's personality that would have a knock on affect to the society he is part of, no matter how little.
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:32 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: Whether they find out or not, your causing harm to your relationship and yourself and likely upsetting anyone else who knows. A friend of mine committed adultery (numerous)and I told him not to tell me anymore as I felt guilty whenever I saw his wife.

Suppose what I'm saying is at the very least you're harming yourself, which will affect the relationship and have a knock on affect, at worst(partner still not finding out) innocents who know and feel guilty about knowing, so either way you're doing damage, whether you tell someone or not.

Not really following how it necessarily causes harm to the individual, I have seen people who cheat and it doesn't even seem to make them think twice. Secondly, why is it morally wrong to cause harm to one's self? That seems like that would make all sorts of things morally wrong, smoking, tattoos, eating burgers, drinking, piercings, abortion, playing football, homosexuality, wrestling, and the list goes on and on....
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:35 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:
(November 2, 2011 at 7:27 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Ah, but we're relying on our own moral compass instead of saying "GodWillsIt". You see, that apparently makes all the difference.

I was hoping you’d respond in this thread because this question really is your kryptonite. You stated that we determine what is wrong and right by our social contract and by what hampers our ability to live in a society and so on. Yet if someone commits adultery and is never caught, this has no effect on society whatsoever. So at the very most you could say this was a morally neutral action.

Suddenly I remember something I once said in an argument in high school, "Well, yes, you could SAY that ...but you'd be wrong".

The action is the same. The intent is the same. At the time of action, the adulterer was lying and risking the harm to others.

Saying it's OK because nothing bad happened is like pleading "not guilty" to attempted murder on the grounds that you failed and so no harm was done.

No matter how many times we ride this merry-go-round, my position doesn't change:

1. The "problem" you see in my inability to "justify" the use of reason or morality is only a problem in your head. It isn't a problem for me or any other freethinker. It also, I'll venture, wasn't a problem for you prior to your introduction to TAG. The only alternative was that you were unable to function at all until someone told you "JesusWillsIt".

2. The "solution" that you're so proud of boils down to saying "GodWillsIt n' stuff" (and spuriously dismissing all other gods but the one you just so happened to believe in all along). This simple-minded "axiom" actually does nothing to help us understand what morality is or why we use reason.

3. Unless you are prepared to tell us that you were completely unable to function in life until one day you heard "GodWillsIt n' stuff" and then suddenly everything fell into place for you, this whole argument is pure sophistry and an attempt to justify post hoc what you believed all along because you know you've got fuckall for evidence.

Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(November 2, 2011 at 7:56 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:
(November 2, 2011 at 7:35 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:
(November 2, 2011 at 7:27 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote:


I was hoping you’d respond in this thread because this question really is your kryptonite. You stated that we determine what is wrong and right by our social contract and by what hampers our ability to live in a society and so on. Yet if someone commits adultery and is never caught, this has no effect on society whatsoever. So at the very most you could say this was a morally neutral action.

DP Wrote:Suddenly I remember something I once said in an argument in high school, "Well, yes, you could SAY that ...but you'd be wrong".

The action is the same. The intent is the same. At the time of action, the adulterer was lying and risking the harm to others.

Saying it's OK because nothing bad happened is like pleading "not guilty" to attempted murder on the grounds that you failed and so no harm was done.

Stat said if no one knows, your using an argument in which the crime is known. If the attempted murder was not known about then what harm is there. If no one knows then the one attempting the murder would not have to plead to anything, no harm no foul. I do not think I could count the number of times I've heard people say that if one is not caught in a lie no harm has been done and I've heard it on this forum too.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(August 23, 2011 at 3:24 pm)Cinjin Wrote: I agree that it does not exist in the concept that a theist would purport that is exists. However, objective morality may exist on some level. It may very well be the smallest of platforms, but I think it could be argued that it does exist. I don't know of any society (correct me if I'm wrong) that has ever endorsed random violence (killing) of its own people or a society that has ever excused all forms of murder, rape and theft. There does seem to be a general consensus the world over of a very basic nature that opposes violence when it is unchecked and unwarranted within it's own group.

Is that morality or survival? Try to take food from a wild animal. (theft) Try to injure a wild animals kids (murder) Try to rape a gorilla Do animals have morals?.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson

God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers

Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders

Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Reply
RE: Objective Morality?
(October 30, 2011 at 1:30 am)apophenia Wrote: I believe in objective morality. In saying this, I am building on top of Dan Barker's conception that "morality is nothing more than a function that a healthy brain performs".

If morality is simply a function of an individual's brain then it can't possibly be objective, whether or not the brain who determines the values is 'healthy'
.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Beauty, Morality, God, and a Table FrustratedFool 23 3399 October 8, 2023 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  On theism, why do humans have moral duties even if there are objective moral values? Pnerd 37 4633 May 24, 2022 at 11:49 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 15527 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ
  Subjective Morality? mfigurski80 450 54836 January 13, 2019 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Law versus morality robvalue 16 1775 September 2, 2018 at 7:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Objective Standard for Goodness! chimp3 33 6950 June 14, 2018 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Objective morality: how would it affect your judgement/actions? robvalue 42 9879 May 5, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality Mystic 18 4351 May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 15943 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Can somebody give me a good argument in favor of objective morality? Aegon 19 5178 March 14, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 16 Guest(s)