The Official "Damned Trump" Thread

[The Architect Of Fate]

1. Are you suggesting Tea Partiers would have voted democrat if they had not run Hilary as a candidate? That seems unlikely.

I'm suggesting you provide some evidence for your hypothesis.  I could give a rat's ass if you find me compelling.

1. I'm asking you again. Are you arguing that Tea Partiers would have voted democrat if they had not run Hilary as a candidate?

2. Whether or not you care is irrelevant. The point stands.

[Angrboda]

I'm suggesting you provide some evidence for your hypothesis.  I could give a rat's ass if you find me compelling.

1. I'm asking you again. Are you arguing that Tea Partiers would have voted democrat if they had not run Hilary as a candidate?

2. Whether or not you care is irrelevant. The point stands.

I'm guessing we're never gonna see that evidence. Put up or shut up.

[Fake Messiah]

Over at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump has been served with Rep. Bennie G Thompson's lawsuit accusing him of violating the Ku Klux Klan Act in connection with the U.S. Capitol insurrection.

https://www.rawstory.com/amp/donald-trum...2650876627

[The Architect Of Fate]

1. I'm asking you again. Are you arguing that Tea Partiers would have voted democrat if they had not run Hilary as a candidate?

2. Whether or not you care is irrelevant. The point stands.

I'm guessing we're never gonna see that evidence.  Put up or shut up.

I guess you're never going to answer my questions or live up to your own standard. Oh well 

[Angrboda]

I'm guessing we're never gonna see that evidence.  Put up or shut up.

I guess you're never going to answer my questions or live up to your own standard. Oh well 

You want an answer? I haven't said anything remotely similar to what you're asking about.

Now, what standard would that be that I'm not living up to, and when are we gonna see some evidence?

[The Architect Of Fate]

I guess you're never going to answer my questions or live up to your own standard. Oh well 

You want an answer?  I haven't said anything remotely similar to what you're asking about.

Now, what standard would that be that I'm not living up to, and when are we gonna see some evidence?

Sigh 

1. So again no answer, And yes that question directly references our earlier point 

2. I already pointed this out in post #3559 on my second point

3. See point 1

[Angrboda]

You want an answer?  I haven't said anything remotely similar to what you're asking about.

Now, what standard would that be that I'm not living up to, and when are we gonna see some evidence?

Sigh 

1. So again no answer, And yes that question directly references our earlier point 

2. I already pointed this out in post #3559 on my second point

3. See point 1

Well, first of all, none of this answers what standard of mine I'm not living up to. If you're gonna accuse somebody of something and then not back it up, you look like an ass.

Second, I asked you for evidence and you asked whether I was arguing if tea partiers would have voted Democrat if somebody other than Hillary was running, to which I would answer that it doesn't matter as I made clear in my initial post that his support among his base wasn't what swung the election but rather what happened in the middle. If you want to dispute that and argue that a more robust base won him the election, you need to provide some evidence for that. At this point I don't even care if I'm right, what seems more relevant is that you seem to be dicking me and everybody else in this thread around in order to avoid actually supporting the shit you posted.

I haven't posted anything substantive since that initial post. The only thing I've done is ask for evidence. You could have provided evidence for anything and I would have been happy. If you'd misunderstood what I was asking evidence for, I could have said so. But it seems rather funny that this sudden need for additional clarity about what I was saying didn't materialize when you were replying to me, it just magically appeared upon your being asked for evidence. Funny how that is.

And I still have no idea what you mean when you say I'm not living up to my own standard. I have some guesses, but they are only guesses.

What the fuck are you accusing me of?

[The Architect Of Fate]

Well, first of all, none of this answers what standard of mine I'm not living up to. If you're gonna accuse somebody of something and then not back it up, you look like an ass.

Except I didn't accuse you of anything. You literally said 

The statistics say otherwise. The middle hated Trump, but they hated Hillary more, and that swung key states and districts.

I was pointing out you didn't provide evidence for this claim. Then you demand evidence from me. (though it turns out your right)

Second, I asked you for evidence and you asked whether I was arguing if tea partiers would have voted Democrat if somebody other than Hillary was running, to which I would answer that it doesn't matter

See was that difficult?

 as I made clear in my initial post that his support among his base wasn't what swung the election but rather what happened in the middle. If you want to dispute that and argue that a more robust base won him the election, you need to provide some evidence for that.

I didn't dispute that. So what am I supposed to be proving?

 At this point I don't even care if I'm right, what seems more relevant is that you seem to be dicking me and everybody else in this thread around in order to avoid actually supporting the shit you posted.

Who else is even involved 

I haven't posted anything substantive since that initial post. 

Except I didn't accuse you of anything. You literally said 

The statistics say otherwise. The middle hated Trump, but they hated Hillary more, and that swung key states and districts.

The only thing I've done is ask for evidence. You could have provided evidence for anything and I would have been happy. If you'd misunderstood what I was asking evidence for, I could have said so. But it seems rather funny that this sudden need for additional clarity about what I was saying didn't materialize when you were replying to me, it just magically appeared upon your being asked for evidence. Funny how that is.

No idea what you're saying here 

And I still have no idea what you mean when you say I'm not living up to my own standard. I have some guesses, but they are only guesses.

See above 

What the fuck are you accusing me of?

Nothing because it's not an accusation.

[Angrboda]

The statistics say otherwise. The middle hated Trump, but they hated Hillary more, and that swung key states and districts.

I was pointing out you didn't provide evidence for this claim. Then you demand evidence from me. (though it turns out your right)

I'm sorry, could you link me to where I was asked to provide evidence? If I overlooked it, I most certainly will apologize for my failure to address it.

What the fuck are you accusing me of?

Nothing because it's not an accusation.

You suggested that I would never live up to my own standard. That would be a silly thing to say if I had already met my standard, so obviously you were accusing me of not having done so. So what standard of mine is it that you were accusing me of not having lived up to?

[The Architect Of Fate]

I was pointing out you didn't provide evidence for this claim. Then you demand evidence from me. (though it turns out your right)

I'm sorry, could you link me to where I was asked to provide evidence?  If I overlooked it, I most certainly will apologize for my failure to address it.

Nothing because it's not an accusation.

You suggested that I would never live up to my own standard.  That would be a silly thing to say if I had already met my standard, so obviously you were accusing me of not having done so.  So what standard of mine is it that you were accusing me of not having lived up to?

1. Wheater you were asked or not you made a claim that you didn't back with evidence. Thus the standard claims should be backed up with evidence was not been met.

2. I said in this instance you made a claim you didn't back it while asking i back up a claim. And it wasn't an accusation that has a specific moral implication. I was simply pointing out what I feel is an inconsistency without inferring any duplicity or malice behind it.