Why did Communists promote Evolution?

[The Architect Of Fate]

So more bullshit 

[Thumpalumpacus]

Good. The sooner religion is done, the better.

Meanwhile, study some biology.

[The Architect Of Fate]

Oh and Rev. Williams is a hack 

[Fake Messiah]

As for the Catholic Church, this is what Pope Pius XII actually said, as I showed in the OP: "1. In Humani Generis, Pope Pius XII explains the position of the Catholic Church on Evolution: Openness if there is conclusive proof, but cautious skepticism otherwise: "5. If anyone examines the state of affairs outside the Christian fold, he will easily discover the principle trends that not a few learned men are following. Some imprudently and indiscreetly hold that evolution, which has not been fully proved even in the domain of natural sciences, explains the origin of all things, and audaciously support the monistic and pantheistic opinion that the world is in continual evolution. Communists gladly subscribe to this opinion so that, when the souls of men have been deprived of every idea of a personal God, they may the more efficaciously defend and propagate their dialectical materialism." https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/...neris.html

Just another proof that Christianity is a debunked fraud.

[Deesse23]

One of the major phenotypical differences between humans and other members of the ape family is human males, unique amongst the great apes, have large, positively enormous,  penises.   All other apes have tiny little penises by comparison.

Ah, maybe thats why i keep getting invited by baby killing, marxist, liberal, always-wanting-to-sin, atheist*, evolutionist scientists. Maybe thats why they alyways come with measureing tapes and tell me i privide them with irrefutable evidence for evilution.

* sorry if i missed some qualifier

[Anomalocaris]

How one reacts to the Truth only reveals the state of one's own Soul. Memes do not prove anything:

"There is no such thing as de-evolution. Organisms go from less complicated to more complicated and also from more complicated to less complicated - it is all evolution. Humans could again evolve into less intelligent, more hairy creatures with longer hands."

You claim there is no such thing as de-evolution then describe de-evolution. If you think humans could again become apes, there's nothing left to say.

This is a false theory invented by man in the depths of his depravity in a desperate attempt to deny Almighty God. I doubt anyone will still believe it by 2050.

Of course there is de-evolution.   It is physically impossible for your parents to not be more evolved than you.

[Fake Messiah]

You claim there is no such thing as de-evolution then describe de-evolution. If you think humans could again become apes, there's nothing left to say.

Sigh. Evolution means change and one can not de-change. It is all change (evolution). De-evolution is a cultural expression, not biological.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

@Nishant

 Descendants of the ape, lol. Reminds me of what Piers Compton documented in the Broken Cross, which I'll cite in a minute. Btw, if any of us are actual descendants of the ape (we aren't), then, logically, it would follow, some of our descendants could be apes as well. This is what Evolutionists in Evo-Devo call "Devolution". Wiki: "Devolution, de-evolution, or backward evolution is the notion that species can revert to supposedly more primitive forms over time." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devolution_(biology)

And if anyone actually thinks human beings will give birth to apes again one day, he/she is kidding himself/herself. Yet this is what evolution/devolution would lead to. All these fallacies/sophisms come from failing to distinguish Accidental and Essential/Substantial Changes. The difference between Apes and Human Beings is an Essential/Substantial difference. It is never going to be traversed just by throwing in even billions of years if you want. Now, the difference between different kinds of humans - different genetic properties of those who are and remain biologically and genetically human beings - is an accidental difference. Only these kinds of differences will take place through natural selection. Humanity did not evolve from apes, which is to say apes did not give birth to humans. Neither will humans ever devolve to apes; those are all similar evolutionist errors.

These two paras are enough to amply demonstrate that you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Devolution is utterly discredited - there simply is no such thing. If it happened, it would require evolutionary processes to operate in reverse along exactly the same path (source: the Wikipedia article YOU linked). This is impossible, both mathematically and biologically.

Nothing in any evolutionary theory states, implies, or even hints at apes giving birth to humans. By saying these startlingly ignorant things, you're not actually attacking evolution - you're attacking what evolution isn't and never has been.

Read through those TalkOrigins links I gave, as well as other articles on that site. It behooves you to learn more about evolution, if for no other reason than to stop making an ignorant ass of yourself where everybody can see.

Boru

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

One of the major phenotypical differences between humans and other members of the ape family is human males, unique amongst the great apes, have large, positively enormous,  penises.   All other apes have tiny little penises by comparison.

Ah, maybe thats why i keep getting invited by baby killing, marxist, liberal, always-wanting-to-sin, atheist*, evolutionist scientists. Maybe thats why they alyways come with measureing tapes and tell me i privide them with irrefutable evidence for evilution.

* sorry if i missed some qualifier

Nishant's mantra:



Boru

[Bucky Ball]

NX

1. Descendants of the ape, lol. Reminds me of what Piers Compton documented in the Broken Cross, which I'll cite in a minute. Btw, if any of us are actual descendants of the ape (we aren't),
... bla bla bla

Unfortunately for you, your ignorant assertions are lies.
Your sermons are too long.
STFU