Acountability, never got a good answer to this.

[Reforged]

.

Let me strip this bullshit down a little just to make things go a little more efficiently

1- fair play, all discussion should take into account all points raised wherever possible, yet having second-hand opinions is only good when you can actually expand on them and aren't trying to gain boo-hoorahs by pasting other people's opinions, stop being a pretentious wanker.
2- that's normal, its called skepticism and it's generally useful for sifting the wheat from the chaff in life.
3- question dodging, stop being a pussy, if your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny and you can't answer questions then amend it or admit defeat
4- agree with Raphiel, don't moan about your questions not being answered then bitch about questions being asked. Admittedly there should be responses but you'll have to accept that people can't always respond to everything, other stuff is going on in the world.

Personally I'd advise avoiding the Ad-Homs because that's a pussy move to cover for a bad argument and just generally a dick thing to do

I suppose my main points are (1)- whenever possible all points should be considered regardless of how you perceive their value, and (2)- If you've no personal response there is very little point citing others, that's simply avoidance

I could care less about Ad Homins, I blaspheme both claims and individuals myself so I really could give a shit less if a theists does the same to me. What is more important to me is the argument someone makes.

Alright, what do you think of the argument Fr0d0 makes then?