"Cut and paste" Christianity

[fr0d0]

That was laughable! Maybe that's why I don't think you've substantiated anything then

[chatpilot]

You can't substantiate anything to fr0d0s satisfaction. True to all practicing xtians with a knowledge of apologetics he will always find a non rational way to wriggle his way out of it.

[Violet]

You can't substantiate anything to fr0d0s satisfaction

Funny, I think the same thing... Kind of like how he can't do the same to our satisfaction about his religion?

Anyway, i suppose our definitions clash if you thought that was A: laughable, and B: non-substantiated. Please do tell me when you find evidence that is not both A and B about your religion?

[chatpilot]

I know what you mean Saerules. When we define everything from a religious point of view then everything in the real world becomes unsubstantiated and the old definitions no longer apply.

[fr0d0]

Yet you completely fail to ever rationalize your standpoint chatty. Look at that ridiculous statement for a start - you don't understand the very basic first principle of the subject you're studying for heavens sake.

Great Sae - I'm supposed to take your ludicrous statements as the best logical rebut you can come up with? Please explain to me how evidence is anything to do with it.

[chatpilot]

I forgot fr0d0, Christians can't think rationally since it takes an abandonment of reason to believe in Christianity or any religion to begin with.

[fr0d0]

Baseless assertion alert

[Violet]

Great Sae - I'm supposed to take your ludicrous statements as the best logical rebut you can come up with? Please explain to me how evidence is anything to do with it.

'Substantiated' implies evidence. Your religion has no evidence (so far as I can see, enlighten me perhaps?)... therefore it is non-substantiated. Because of that... your continued assertion of it is laughable

So find me evidence that is substantiated and logical for your religion... and then you can make the statement of

That was laughable! Maybe that's why I don't think you've substantiated anything then

without any reasons of what makes it so

[fr0d0]

Woah - that's an incredibly ludicrous post Sae. Masterful existentialism.. you are truly a mistress

[chatpilot]

fr0d0, you truly believe that it does not take an abandonment of reason to believe in god? Let's see, first you believe in a god whose existence is dubious at best. In fact there is no, zilch, zero, nada evidence of his existence except for a book written by a bunch of delusional nomads a few thousand years ago, note that I am including the O.T. in this analysis. Not to mention the fact that this books contents have been manipulated an innumerable number of times and there have not been found any original copies of this books contents to date. Then you base all of your arguments on this website and in all the forums within it from the assertion that this god exist because somehow in your delusional mind he "just is". That is your answer for everything to date, "I dont think of him in terms of existence he just is". It seems like the only illogical, irrational one here is you. I will dumb it down for you: you base all of your arguments no matter what those might be from the premise that god exist while having no evidence and from a Christian worldview.