Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 10:49 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
#11
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 12:11 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: However we are not out of the woods yet. I mainly want to know how "An ion-powered pump for expelling substances from the cell might then have mutated to form the basis of a rotary motor" is possible without direction towards that? Or does it get improved in expelling substances until it forms a rotary motor?

Why would direction be required? It's not as though the bacterium were sitting around going "hey fellas, got any ideas for how we might effect a rudimentary rotary motor?"
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#12
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 12:14 pm)Rhythm Wrote:
(April 6, 2013 at 12:11 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: However we are not out of the woods yet. I mainly want to know how "An ion-powered pump for expelling substances from the cell might then have mutated to form the basis of a rotary motor" is possible without direction towards that? Or does it get improved in expelling substances until it forms a rotary motor?

Why would direction be required? It's not as though the bacterium were sitting around going "hey fellas, got any ideas for how we might effect a rudimentary rotary motor?"

I mean it directed by being advantageous and natural selection then making the advantageous keeping piling up till it get's to the new function.
Reply
#13
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
If it's advantageous, and advantage piles up, then why do we need to invoke direction?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#14
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 12:19 pm)Rhythm Wrote: If it's advantageous, and advantage piles up, then why do we need to invoke direction?

Well, I mean that would be direction, by natural selection. However how is it heading towards the other function by that method?

What is it improving upon, till it get's towards rotary system?
Reply
#15
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
Except that it isn't direction, by anything. In the sense that we might look back and say "that's the direction it took" as in a specific path - it's passable for conveying what we mean.....but here's the kicker:

The language we use to consider or convey some concept influences how we perceive it. Often, especially in something like this - so far removed from the experience available to us in forming the language and words and associated connections- the terms we might choose have the effect of fucking with us massively.

The statement that followed this one makes for a dramatic example of this.

Quote:However how is it heading towards the other function by that method?

What is it improving upon, till it get's towards rotary system?
It's not "heading towards" anything. The organism is simply surviving, persisting. It's not "improving upon" anything, the organism is simply surviving, persisting. There is no identifiable goal or destination to head towards. There is no criteria or measurement (or measuring authority) to judge or affect "improvement".
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#16
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 12:31 pm)Rhythm Wrote: It's not "heading towards" anything. The organism is simply surviving, persisting. It's not "improving upon" anything, the organism is simply surviving, persisting. There is no identifiable goal or destination to head towards. There is no criteria or measurement (or measuring authority) to judge or affect "improvement".

However you state it, how is surviving by series of mutations go towards the function of rotary system?

Or how did it go towards that direction? Or how was it possible that it went in that direction?
Reply
#17
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
It doesn't, and that's what I'm trying to express to you. It's not going towards it. It's possible to end up there in that if you arrange the structure of an organisms anatomy in a certain way it is recognizable to us as a "rudimentary rotary engine".
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#18
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
(April 6, 2013 at 12:45 pm)Rhythm Wrote: It's not going towards it.

Then it will never get there.
Reply
#19
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
I'm not sure why you think that? Things find themselves in places all the time, without having ever intended to go there, made any effort to do so, or even realized that they were moving, or that there was a "there" or that "they" were "going" to "there". Rocks, for example.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#20
RE: Intelligent design type evolution vs naturalism type evolution.
Well again semantics Rhythm. Remember it's SMALL changes over time. It doesn't just get re-arranged and voila, you have a complex system.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Intelligent Design Is Pseudoscience: Creationist Lies About Evolution Debunked CodeDNA 7 1322 April 22, 2023 at 6:44 pm
Last Post: no one
  Blind evolution or intelligent design? ignoramus 12 2458 August 2, 2017 at 8:00 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Why Do Otherwise Intelligent People Succomb to Religion? Rhondazvous 47 10088 October 25, 2015 at 8:40 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Directionality in evolution without intelligent guidance tantric 25 6017 January 22, 2015 at 6:19 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Intelligent Design: Irreducible Complexity? OfficerVajardian 49 14270 August 17, 2014 at 2:37 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design triumph! Mudhammam 2 1405 July 17, 2014 at 7:05 am
Last Post: FreeTony
  Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts Muslim Scholar 57 25187 October 30, 2013 at 9:45 am
Last Post: orogenicman
Lightbulb Intelligent Design, Proof V Muslim Scholar 75 47464 June 22, 2013 at 10:49 am
Last Post: popeyespappy
  Intelligent Design, Proof IV Muslim Scholar 97 53782 June 19, 2013 at 7:44 pm
Last Post: Esquilax
  Intelligent Design, Proof III Muslim Scholar 61 30822 May 29, 2013 at 3:14 am
Last Post: Esquilax



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)