Considering all of the nothing you have offered for a refutation I won't take your words to heart.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 4:44 pm
Thread Rating:
Are Ray and Kirk Perfect?
|
(July 22, 2013 at 11:40 am)Godschild Wrote:(July 22, 2013 at 10:05 am)Psykhronic Wrote: Wow, you really can't handle your own idiocy being torn down huh? Sounds a lot like a child's reaction. You still haven't proven to anyone on this post how if we're created in god's image (and mind you, he's supposed to be perfect) why we are all so flawed. Quote:You should really be careful about posting things you know nothing about and posting things from people you think know what they are talking about. Why, G-C? You are a pro at it. (July 22, 2013 at 11:41 am)Psykhronic Wrote: Considering all of the nothing you have offered for a refutation I won't take your words to heart. Good, I was not looking for your approval.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Its funny GC, how you haven't yet explained how his logic is childish. Is that maybe because you can't explain how?
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House “Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom "If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech RE: Are Ray and Kirk Perfect?
July 22, 2013 at 5:13 pm
(This post was last modified: July 22, 2013 at 5:18 pm by Michael Schubert.)
(July 22, 2013 at 5:37 am)Godschild Wrote:(July 22, 2013 at 1:25 am)Michael Schubert Wrote: Then the book continues with another example, this one concerning the human wind pipe and eating: What does all of that have to do with the issue at hand? The reason fewer people choke to death is because everyone knows that their throat is connected to the windpipe they breath out of, so they are careful to chew their food so they don't choke. Whether or not that statistic you cited is true (you don't claim a source), it is adventitious to the evolution of our bodies. You're talking crazy! (July 22, 2013 at 8:11 am)Godschild Wrote:You don't even understand what I originally said.(July 22, 2013 at 6:00 am)Rationalman Wrote: I don't even know where to start on this. All I can say is i don't think you understand what he was getting at. He wasn't saying we would be better without a windpipe or whatever. He was saying it is not intelligently designed because we choke a lot. If we were intelligently designed, we would use different holes for breathing and eating, this would prevent people choking. I suggest next time you type something, YOU should think for a moment, that might help. (July 22, 2013 at 9:26 am)Godschild Wrote: @ Exlax, you are the most unreasonable, irresponsible person I've ever seen. Your reasoning is so childish it's not worth responding to. When and if you grow up I might consider responding again, until then... bye.This is the Argument Ad Hominem Fallacy at its finest.
When someone starts talking about breathing out of their elbow, I no longer can take anything they say as intelligent, their only purpose is to deflect the truth from what another has said because they have no real argument against what was stated.
The reason any of you have made your crazy statements is this, everything I've said about the design of throat and windpipe are true making it a good design and you can find no way to prove different. You four are childish trouble makers that care nothing for an intelligent conversation, all you care about is ridiculing Christians because of your disdain for what we live our lives for. And you call you're selves tolerant, that's the biggest joke of the day, no week... nope year.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
When you start choking on that overstuffed steak burrito from Taco Bell you're going to wish that you could breathe out your ears.
(July 23, 2013 at 1:20 am)Godschild Wrote: When someone starts talking about breathing out of their elbow, I no longer can take anything they say as intelligent, their only purpose is to deflect the truth from what another has said because they have no real argument against what was stated. I don't see what the problem is. God can't create someone who breathes out of their elbow? I thought it was omnipotent. A good design, by whose standards? The human body is riddled with problems. 1-3 % of all babies ever born will have deformities requiring medical interventions. We're not even counting handicaps that show up later in life. We're not even counting miscarriages and ectopic pregnancies yet. The system is highly flawed. You seem to think that we can't do any better than god did? yea, but why are you limiting god's abilities to our level? we're humans. (July 23, 2013 at 1:20 am)Godschild Wrote: When someone starts talking about breathing out of their elbow, I no longer can take anything they say as intelligent, their only purpose is to deflect the truth from what another has said because they have no real argument against what was stated. Yep, there it is again: The Argument Ad Hominem Fallacy. And badwritersparty is correct, the throat and windpipe are pretty inconvenient features. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)