Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 22, 2024, 7:04 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Try God...
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 10:59 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 10:53 am)Chas Wrote: No, I am not. I believe that no gods exist.
There is no evidence for their existence.

I am not claiming no gods exist, I am stating disbelief.

Have I found the "achilles heel" of atheism? "Ambiguity".

Yet the Christian must be crystal clear about everything that exists his pie-hole.

You educate yourself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God

There is no Achilles' heal. This is simply rational and intellectually honest.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 10:52 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: How is anyone here on this forum suposed to take you serious as a honest participant in a debate when you have no problem with purposly changing the definitions of words with the intention to deceive others!!!!

Here let me help you! AGNOSTIC: "PROBABLY" ...... ATHEIST: "NO"

What's hard about understanding that? Are we losing something in the translation here?
Quis ut Deus?
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 11:18 am)ronedee Wrote: Here let me help you! AGNOSTIC: "PROBABLY" ...... ATHEIST: "NO"

What's hard about understanding that? Are we losing something in the translation here?

Wrong again.

You wrote:

Quote:1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god

You snuck in the idiotic and pointless term "ultimate reality" to which you added the word "god" and added that the agnostic assumes that these things are inknowable.



on contrast the accurate definition is:

Quote:Agnosticism is the view that the truth values of certain claims—especially claims about the existence or non-existence of any deity, as well as other religious and metaphysical claims—are unknown and (so far as can be judged) unknowable.[1][2][3] Agnosticism can be defined in various ways, and is sometimes used to indicate doubt or a skeptical approach to questions. In some senses, agnosticism is a stance about the difference between belief and knowledge, rather than about any specific claim or belief

So why change a definition of a term? Do you think you can thereby change reality into what you think it should be like?!?!????

No mention of "Ultimate reality" whatever the fuck that is suposed to mean! And absolutly no mentioning of the word "god"!
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 11:18 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 10:52 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: How is anyone here on this forum suposed to take you serious as a honest participant in a debate when you have no problem with purposly changing the definitions of words with the intention to deceive others!!!!

Here let me help you! AGNOSTIC: "PROBABLY" ...... ATHEIST: "NO"

What's hard about understanding that? Are we losing something in the translation here?

What is it about "agnostic atheist" you don't understand?

You are making an unfounded assumption that to be an atheist, one must be making the statement "God does not exist".
No, to be an atheist, one simply does not believe in a god.

An atheist is one who lacks a belief in gods. a- (without) theist (god).

Agnostic refers to knowledge, not belief.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 11:18 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 10:52 am)The Germans are coming Wrote: How is anyone here on this forum suposed to take you serious as a honest participant in a debate when you have no problem with purposly changing the definitions of words with the intention to deceive others!!!!

Here let me help you! AGNOSTIC: "PROBABLY" ...... ATHEIST: "NO"

What's hard about understanding that? Are we losing something in the translation here?

AGNOSTIC - I don't know for sure or if it can be known for sure
ATHEIST - I don't believe in a God

What's so hard about that?
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 25, 2013 at 10:16 pm)Godschild Wrote:
(July 25, 2013 at 10:01 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote: Philosophy says it, not I. And that's what he's doing. Indeed, if someone states that "god does not exist", the burden then falls to that person to show why that is. I'm not going to do his work for him, but the points he makes are much more reasonable than the ones that believers in god assert.

I've been here for over three years and not one shred of proof has been given to show God does not exist.

Not a shred of proof has been given to show that leprechauns don't exist, either.

(July 26, 2013 at 10:28 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 25, 2013 at 4:08 pm)Mister Agenda Wrote: LOL, all you were asked to do was find a single atheist claiming what you said we claim. One! You're hilariously evasive. ROFLOL

How about every "supposed" Atheist? Don't you even know what you are?

Webster: Definition of ATHEISM
1archaic : ungodliness, wickedness
2a : a [disbelief in the existence] of deity b : the doctrine that [there is no] deity

Doesn't say life came from nothing. Doesn't say atheists believe life came from nothing. It might have been a mistake when you said it, but if you continue to claim it's what we say knowing you can't find a single example of an atheist saying it, it's no longer a mistake, it's lying.

But let me break it down for you: One, there's nothing in the definition of atheist that entails atheists having to have a specific belief regarding the origin of life. I've known atheists who believe in ghosts, if an atheist believed the first living cell was poofed into existence by Casper, that wouldn't make them a theist, just delusional.

Two: certainly in the West, most atheists accept that some version of natural abiogenesis is the most likely explanation for the origin of life. No hypotheses of abiogenesis involve life appearing from nothing. They all involve the earliest life arising from chemical proccesses. Chemicals are not 'nothing', so you will never hear a person who thinks along these lines say that life came from nothing.

Three: I would be less surprised to find out ghosts really do exist than I would be if you actually admitted that you were not right when you said that atheists say life came from nothing.

(July 26, 2013 at 10:53 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 10:49 am)Psykhronic Wrote: Hmm. Are belief and knowledge different things? Because if they are then one can be both and Atheist and Agnostic. I'm going to hint at this one: Yeah you can be both, just like one can be an agnostic theist.

Well... I've never heard of an "agnostic atheist"... It actually sounds laughable!

My dad is an atheist, and my brother an agnostic. You'd never know by their arguments that they share the same opinion.

Be a man/cat... pick one.

Agnostic atheists and gnostic atheists are just different varieties of the same species. Like Tabbies or Siamese, not like humans or cats.

Most atheists are agnostic atheist. It's not a new thing. It's also called 'negative atheism', as opposed to 'positive atheism'. Positive atheists are a minority among atheits.

Utter certainty is not required to be an atheist or a theist. If you took the positon that you don't know if God exists, but you believe he does anyway; 'poof', you would no longer have the burden of proof...but then you would have to accept that you don't have valid arguments to prove God's existence and you belong to a prosyletizing religion, so you need to believe you have them, else it would be blatantly unjust for the God you believe condemns nonbelievers to hell to do so.

I on the other hand, argue for the sport of deconstructing bad arguments and could care less if you become an atheist...the most I want from you is to someday be able to tell when you're about to make an unsound argument. I don't have a need to get people to stop believing in God, it's not my business what they believe unless their beliefs lead to actions that make it my business.

(July 26, 2013 at 10:59 am)ronedee Wrote:
(July 26, 2013 at 10:53 am)Chas Wrote: No, I am not. I believe that no gods exist.
There is no evidence for their existence.

I am not claiming no gods exist, I am stating disbelief.

Have I found the "achilles heel" of atheism? "Ambiguity".

Yet the Christian must be crystal clear about everything that exists his pie-hole.

You educate yourself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God

You don't have to be crystal clear. You could be humble and admit that you don't know the unknowable. I'm not holding my breath for that, though.
Reply
RE: Try God...
blah...blah....BLAH! I love to watch "back-paddling"!

aka: rhetoric

Its the precursor to sinking!ROFLOL
Quis ut Deus?
Reply
RE: Try God...
I love watching people stroke their own egos when they have nothing left to say.
Reply
RE: Try God...
(July 26, 2013 at 1:52 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: I love watching people stroke their own egos when they have nothing left to say.

I asked a simple question:

"No" or "Probably"?
Quis ut Deus?
Reply
RE: Try God...
False dilemma and you clearly do not have a grasp on definitions.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  God is god, and we are not god StoryBook 43 13853 January 6, 2014 at 5:47 pm
Last Post: StoryBook
  If you believe in the God of the Bible, why try to prove it logically? Zarith 391 179833 July 20, 2013 at 6:49 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  God get's angry, Moses changes God's plans of wrath, God regrets "evil" he planned Mystic 9 7185 February 16, 2012 at 8:17 am
Last Post: Strongbad



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)