Christians IN Hell

[xpastor]

Back when I was a devout Christian, I used to detest the jerks who called themselves True Christians implying that all the others were phoneys.

Even after decades as an atheist the colossal arrogance of it still really pisses me off.

[ronedee]

Back when I was a devout Christian, I used to detest the jerks who called themselves True Christians implying that all the others were phoneys.

Even after decades as an atheist the colossal arrogance of it still really pisses me off.

Doesn't this "implication" go for just about anything? Why are Christians any different?

[Cinjin]

Back when I was a devout Christian, I used to detest the jerks who called themselves True Christians implying that all the others were phoneys.
Even after decades as an atheist the colossal arrogance of it still really pisses me off.

Doesn't this "implication" go for just about anything? Why are Christians any different?

Because there is a gaping chasm between the claim of "I drive the nicest car on the block" and damning people to eternal hellfire. Don't be obtuse.

[Marsellus Wallace]

Mort's reaction after seeing both vids

[Ryantology]

Jesus said himself that not everyone who said "Lord, Lord..." will have a place in the Kingdom. Its less of an orthodoxy question and more of an orthopraxy one, I.e actions speak louder than words.

Funny how it seems like it's only ever other Christians who have to worry about that, though, and never the obviously-saved little lamb cutlet uttering the sentiment.

[Neo-Scholastic]

41,000 denominations, some of them are bound to be wrong. [/sarcasm]

Whereas atheism is certainly wrong. On that we all agree. Repent. [/serious]

[Bob Kelso]

41,000 denominations, some of them are bound to be wrong. [/sarcasm]

Whereas atheism is certainly wrong. On that we all agree. Repent. [/serious]

I've seen the error of my ways. Lawdy lawdy.

Blow it out your ass Wooters.

[Cinjin]

41,000 denominations, some of them are bound to be wrong. [/sarcasm]

Whereas atheism is certainly wrong. On that we all agree. Repent. [/serious]

Repent? Repent for what? Being born? I think not.
Common Chad, you're better than that. Don't be that cliche christian.

[Rampant.A.I.]

Whereas atheism is certainly wrong. On that we all agree. Repent. [/serious]

Repent? Repent for what? Being born? I think not.
Common Chad, you're better than that. Don't be that cliche christian.

Better? Remove the arrogant wording and obfuscation behind psuedo intellectualist terminology, and this is all the man ever posts!

[Cinjin]

Well what do you expect from a guy who uses Emanuel Swedenborg as his avatar. Here's just a taste of the crazy that CW is apparently into:

In 1741, at age 53, he entered into a spiritual phase in which he began to experience dreams and visions, beginning on Easter weekend of April 6, 1744. This culminated in a 'spiritual awakening', in which he received revelation that he was appointed by the Lord to write the The Heavenly Doctrine to reform Christianity. According to The Heavenly Doctrine the Lord had opened Swedenborg's spiritual eyes, so that from then on he could freely visit heaven and hell and talk with angels, demons and other spirits; and the Last Judgement had already occurred, in 1757. However, he tells us that at this day it is very dangerous to talk with spirits, unless a person is in true faith, and is led by the Lord.

And then we have this gem from this 18th century fucktard:




Yeeah, who the hell would quote this imbecile? Jesusfuck, that's a disaster of a thought - let alone a quote.