Posts: 957
Threads: 1
Joined: October 10, 2013
Reputation:
2
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am
evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
Atheist Credo: A universe by chance that also just happened to admit the observer by chance.
Posts: 19648
Threads: 177
Joined: July 31, 2012
Reputation:
91
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 4:30 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2014 at 4:33 am by pocaracas.)
(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
Damn! It's a good thing they don't base their classification solely on craniodental characters, huh?
Posts: 1946
Threads: 17
Joined: February 6, 2014
Reputation:
18
Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 4:53 am
(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
You're about 30 years out of date.
If you want to continue using terms like "evolutionists" I suggest you update your source material.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 6:54 am
(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
And again, all you have is a single fifteen year old paper. Funny, this thing you posted has been around for over a decade, and yet mainstream science still wholeheartedly accepts evolution! Weird!
It's probably got something to do with the fact that craniodental characters are part of a web of analyses that also include genetics and the rest of the organism, you cherry picking chucklefuck.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 3022
Threads: 34
Joined: May 11, 2013
Reputation:
30
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 9:36 am
Ha chucklefuck! My new favourite insult!
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain
'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House
“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom
"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Posts: 7175
Threads: 12
Joined: March 14, 2013
Reputation:
72
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 11:09 am
(May 19, 2014 at 6:54 am)Esquilax Wrote: And again, all you have is a single fifteen year old paper. What??? A Christian using a single source that's out-of-date?
"Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts don't go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's in this century, but apples didn't suspend themselves in midair, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape- like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin's proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered."
-Stephen Jay Gould
Posts: 1946
Threads: 17
Joined: February 6, 2014
Reputation:
18
Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 11:24 am
(This post was last modified: May 19, 2014 at 11:28 am by Rampant.A.I..)
(May 19, 2014 at 12:51 am)snowtracks Wrote: but it's clear, that this atheist thing is rapidly losing ground. the militant atheist movement had it's day, and now is turning tail.
How much of a sad sack would anyone have to be to desperately dig for sources that reinforce this conclusion, instead of waking up and taking a look around?
"Oh, we didn't evolve: a magical wizard put us all here the same way we are now."
Yes, Virginia. Science is discarding everything learned in the last few hundred years, in favor of the Magical Wizard explanation. Haven't you heard?
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
103
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 1:40 pm
(May 19, 2014 at 12:51 am)snowtracks Wrote: but it's clear, that this atheist thing is rapidly losing ground. the militant atheist movement had it's day, and now is turning tail.
Just such utter crap.
Atheism =/= evolution.
And that's leaving out the entirety of your contribution on this forum, which to date has been little more than baseless assertion mixed with taking potshots at a theory that you really don't appear to understand.
If your superiority complex gives you the false impression that you're actually achieving anything here other than revealing how some theists really appear to be out of touch with modern society, then I guess I really just feel sorry for you.
But please, carry on. I'm sure a lot of lurkers who have read through this thread (more patience than I!) have begun to doubt their theistic beliefs more than they have evolution, so I think in that way you deserve some kudos.
Posts: 2962
Threads: 44
Joined: March 22, 2013
Reputation:
39
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 1:49 pm
(May 19, 2014 at 2:54 am)snowtracks Wrote: evolutionary biology used cladistics showing diagrams relating humans with primates and it was all a big sham. Evolutionists thought no one would notice that they interpreted the data exclusively within their theoretical paradigm to support human evolution. You should ask for you money back.
“The results of the parsimony and bootstrap tests indicate that cladistic analyses based on standard craniodental characters cannot be relied on to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the hominoids, papionins, and, by extension, the fossil hominins“.
http://www.pnas.org/content/97/9/5003.full
Instead of getting all-sciency, you'd be better off using the tried and true evolution crushers we've come to know and love, such as:
1. If we's a come from uh mahkee, how's a come they's still mahkees?!? Checkmate devil wershipper! Check-fucking-mate!
2. Why come we no see a fish turnin' into uh, a cat? or a cat-fishy thang? Huh? Accept Jeezus now! Jeezus roolez!
3. The devil done sowed them thar dino bones to test yer FAITH. Turn or burn god-haters!
Like that.
Posts: 6896
Threads: 89
Joined: January 13, 2013
Reputation:
116
RE: Abiogenesis is impossible
May 19, 2014 at 2:09 pm
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
|