Posts: 7045
Threads: 20
Joined: June 17, 2014
Reputation:
55
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:47 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:45 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:40 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I never said the word useless, Cameltoe. It's a waste of time discussing anything with someone who literally says flat out "Nothing you say matters, I know I'm right." The discussion is over at that point, which is now. Okay, but honestly you are so far off my name, it is extremely funny. Any way I never said I AM RIGHT, I still want to hear what you think of womens role in society.
Then read over the last 30 or so pages, I've posted quite a bit in this thread. I'm done with you.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 2471
Threads: 21
Joined: December 7, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:48 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:45 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I still want to hear what you think of womens role in society. (excerpt)
And I'm still waiting for my sandwich 
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:49 pm
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2014 at 2:50 pm by C4RM5.)
(September 15, 2014 at 2:47 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:45 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Okay, but honestly you are so far off my name, it is extremely funny. Any way I never said I AM RIGHT, I still want to hear what you think of womens role in society.
Then read over the last 30 or so pages, I've posted quite a bit in this thread. I'm done with you. Cheerio then, see you in the next debate and God bless.
(September 15, 2014 at 2:48 pm)ShaMan Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:45 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I still want to hear what you think of womens role in society. (excerpt)
And I'm still waiting for my sandwich I just made a sandwich, no butter though, still have to learn how to do it properly.
Posts: 2471
Threads: 21
Joined: December 7, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:51 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 1:55 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 1:50 pm)ShaMan Wrote: (excerpt)
I could use a sandwich  That is quite sexist. I cook for my wife all the time. Is it sexist when she asks me to make her a sandwich?
Riiiight. The old double standard. If I tell a woman I could use a sandwich then I'm sexist, but if she tells me that she could use a sandwich then she's just asserting her equality. Wait a minute... if that's equality then how is one sexist and the other not?
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:53 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:51 pm)ShaMan Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 1:55 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: That is quite sexist. I cook for my wife all the time. Is it sexist when she asks me to make her a sandwich?
Riiiight. The old double standard. If I tell a woman I could use a sandwich then I'm sexist, but if she tells me that she could use a sandwich then she's just asserting her equality. Wait a minute... if that's equality then how is one sexist and the other not? I was joking around, It is honestly okay to ask for a sandwich
Posts: 2471
Threads: 21
Joined: December 7, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:55 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:53 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:51 pm)ShaMan Wrote: I cook for my wife all the time. Is it sexist when she asks me to make her a sandwich? I was joking around, It is honestly okay to ask for a sandwich Very well, but can you make mayonnaise from scratch? 
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:55 pm)ShaMan Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:53 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I was joking around, It is honestly okay to ask for a sandwich Very well, but can you make mayonnaise from scratch? No but I can... alright nothing beats making mayonnaise from scratch.
Posts: 2471
Threads: 21
Joined: December 7, 2013
Reputation:
43
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 3:02 pm
(September 15, 2014 at 2:57 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:55 pm)ShaMan Wrote: ...can you make mayonnaise from scratch? ...nothing beats making mayonnaise from scratch. My work is done here. I think we can now...
[/thread]
Posts: 3817
Threads: 5
Joined: November 19, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 15, 2014 at 5:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2014 at 5:35 pm by Chas.)
(September 15, 2014 at 1:06 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 12:55 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Except if you can interpret the book in any way you like, as you've said, then anything it says about "right and wrong" is utterly relative and largely useless, since two people could reach the opposite conclusion on any given problem. Example: Homosexuality. Some Christians say homosexuality is disordered, some Christians say homosexuality is not a disorder. They both can't be right. Somethings are up for debate are arguement. Others are set in stone and can't really be interpreted any differently. This would be things such as salvation. Others, like homosexual marriage are debatable but it states clearly in the Bible homosexuality is a sin. Where I live homosexuality is not legal. This doesn't mean I view homosexuals with disrespect, I view them as equal. The Bible doesn't say certain sins are worse than others, everyone is the same.
Nope. There are many interpretations of salvation. You don't seem to know very much about Christianity.
(September 15, 2014 at 2:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 2:26 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: No, I'm not trying to guess your name Carmen, what gave you that idea. Also, you're providing books that are garage-produced by a British evangelical minister, and not in any way academic or historical. Just because some arse (since he's British) claims something in his pet fantasy book doesn't make it evidence. If there exist these 24000 contemporary manuscripts (thats a lot of documents), you'd be able to find a better source than one whackjob's ad-hoc justification for his belief, which doesn't even try to hide the fact that's it's all pre-drawn conclusions. Where are the historical articles? Peer-reviewed dissertations? Literally anything besides "this one guy says so", please.
Well, to be honest I have completely forgotten what I am talking about. The Bible is all about faith, Jesus himself said that if he prefreformed miracles to certain people they still wouldn't. In oher words no matter what I say you are not going to believe me.
There are no NT manuscipts that are contemporaneous with the alleged events.
None, Nada. Zilch. Zip. There is nothing earlier than c.125 CE.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Posts: 912
Threads: 5
Joined: September 4, 2014
Reputation:
4
RE: Should man rule over women for women’s own good?
September 16, 2014 at 12:42 pm
(This post was last modified: September 16, 2014 at 12:43 pm by C4RM5.)
(September 15, 2014 at 5:29 pm)Chas Wrote: (September 15, 2014 at 1:06 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Somethings are up for debate are arguement. Others are set in stone and can't really be interpreted any differently. This would be things such as salvation. Others, like homosexual marriage are debatable but it states clearly in the Bible homosexuality is a sin. Where I live homosexuality is not legal. This doesn't mean I view homosexuals with disrespect, I view them as equal. The Bible doesn't say certain sins are worse than others, everyone is the same.
Nope. There are many interpretations of salvation. You don't seem to know very much about Christianity.
(September 15, 2014 at 2:32 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Well, to be honest I have completely forgotten what I am talking about. The Bible is all about faith, Jesus himself said that if he prefreformed miracles to certain people they still wouldn't. In oher words no matter what I say you are not going to believe me.
There are no NT manuscipts that are contemporaneous with the alleged events.
None, Nada. Zilch. Zip. There is nothing earlier than c.125 CE.
I agree, I don't know that much about Christianity, there is so much more I can learn.
|
